Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Use pediatric research to solve the threat of gun violence

Vivek Balasubramaniam, MD, Joyce Javier, MD, MPH, Shetal Shah, MD, and Debra L. Weiner, MD, PhD
Policy
September 6, 2019
132 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

The recent Philadelphia-, El Paso- and Dayton-area shootings brought all my memories back. As a pediatric pulmonary and critical care physician, I have been here so many times before.

At 11:12 a.m. on a Wednesday last September, as I sat in my office enjoying a sunny day in the Midwest, I received a two-word text from my 15-year old high school junior: “I’m OK.”

“What happened?” I asked. “Active shooter at Greenway Station,” was the response, less than 1/4 mile from his high school.

That is how the threat of gun violence — an issue which has affected so many — yet again, touched my life. In 1999, the year of the Columbine shooting, I was a pediatric critical care physician in Denver. In 2012, when the Aurora Theater shooting occurred, I was a physician at Children’s Hospital Colorado. Now, as a parent, three stressful, dark hours passed until an “all clear” alert was sent, and I knew my son had survived.

I picked up my son and was at first proud he was unfazed by the day’s events, but then as a parent (one who spent a decade training to address children’s health issues) I was overwhelmed by the realization that this is the “new normal.” Our children live under a dark cloud of the ever-present risk of gun violence and “active shooter” drills.

Though 83 children are injured or die each day from guns, there is no federal commitment to fund research on gun violence prevention. As a pediatric scientist, I know firsthand this would be unacceptable for absolutely any other condition which claims too many children’s lives.

The Society for Pediatric Research, a group of the nation’s foremost pediatric scientists and researchers has joined with the American Academy of Pediatrics and over 160 other national organizations in requesting $50 million in federal funding for the Centers for Disease Control to investigate gun violence prevention strategies that may help keep children safe from firearm injuries.

Research to understand the short and long term multifaceted impact of gun violence, and policies that are demonstrated to reduce both accidents and acts of violence are desperately needed. Evidence currently suggest that firearm fatalities are lower in states with higher numbers of firearm laws. We even know what we need to be answered. Key emergency-medicine relevant research questions have been identified by the American College of Emergency Physicians.

In 2015, the number of gun-related fatalities exceeded the number of traffic deaths. In 2016, the number of deaths of children, ages 10-19 from firearms was over 1,700. Though guns kill more than half as many children as traffic accidents, there is currently no federal investment in this issue. Annually, the National Highway and Transportation Safety Administration invests $500 million to understand the factors contributing to motor vehicle deaths. Their work has resulted in a steady decline of traffic-related deaths (which were as high as 41,000 in 1997).

Progress in reducing those deaths occurred because the federal government recognized the potential harm of motor vehicles and invested in public health research to better understand how to protect children riding in cars. Research funding has given us child car seats, seal belt laws, and innovations like airbags. Public officials used scientific research to craft policies like mandatory seat belt laws and minimum car safety requirements that have saved countless lives.

In the absence of strong federal support, non-profit organizations have been leaders in piecing together the evidence that is available to help guide gun safety policy. The modest amount of evidence has yielded actionable results. The RAND Corporation, for example, has noted evidence supports state regulations which penalize gun owners if they do not safely store their firearm in a locked container with the ammunition stored separately. Such “safe storage” laws could reduce accidental childhood deaths from guns by 33%. But private organizations, even those for which gun violence research is a priority such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, cannot match the sustained financial investment required to address the research aims to generate evidence-based guidelines, policies, and laws. These dollars are also needed to jumpstart a group of researchers who have been starved from access to federal research dollars for over two decades. During that time, thousands of bright, rising early-career investigators abandoned research into gun injuries because they could not sustain careers or obtain academic promotion without federal grants.

Passage of this $50 million appropriation (the amount the federal government spends in 7 minutes and 12 seconds) must be paired with funding from states and non-profit groups, which are often more nimble in re-allocating dollars to address novel issues and less prone to political partisanship. New York, California, Connecticut, Delaware Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Puerto Rico have made state-based investments in funding gun violence prevention.

The Pediatric Policy Council, a group representing five major academic pediatric organizations, noted the urgent need for research on gun violence and compiled a list of the most basic questions which need to be answered about protecting children from accidental and intentional firearm injuries. These questions could easily be used to guide the allocation of these initial federal funds:

1. What are the most effective methods to prevent young children from unintentionally discharging a firearm?

2. What kinds of public health campaigns best influence safe storage practices by parents?

3. Since two-thirds of successful firearm-related deaths are successful suicides, what characteristics distinguish firearm from non-firearm suicides which are amendable to prevention by parents, teachers, and pediatricians?

4. How are different local and state-based policies around mental health access, public health education, gun regulations, and background checks impacting firearm safety in communities?

5. What individual, family, and community factors are associated with firearm safety in children — specifically unintentional injury, suicide, and homicide?

6. What product safety measures, alone or in combination, are most effective in reducing unintentional injury, suicide, and homicide from firearms in children?

7. What is the impact of consuming violent media content, including over social media on firearm misuse?

8. How can state and federal databases be efficiently developed and linked to create a de-identified, comprehensive, open-access research tool that allows the use of analytics to better predict and prevent inappropriate gun use by or against children?

9. What as the long-term societal costs of gun misuse against children caused by deaths, suicides, serious injury, traumatic stress, and family disruption?

10. What effective gun strategies have been utilized in other countries/culture to promote appropriate gun use?

11. How are school shootings best prevented and when they occur, most effectively mitigated?

Gun violence is both a national issue and a local one. It is an epidemiological and cultural issue. Preventing gun violence against children in all forms should be a universal cause and a universal priority. In the wake of another school shooting, and the daily loss of 83 children, now is the time to understand the science around gun violence better, develop newer evidenced-based policies and dissipate the cloud that is hanging over our children each day they head to school.

Vivek Balasubramaniam, Joyce Javier, Shetal Shah, and Debra L. Weiner are pediatricians and members, Society for Pediatric Research Advocacy Committee.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Physician coaching: the new normal?

September 6, 2019 Kevin 2
…
Next

How can we address retention in the era of physician burnout?

September 6, 2019 Kevin 3
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Physician coaching: the new normal?
Next Post >
How can we address retention in the era of physician burnout?

Related Posts

  • Gun violence in America is a national emergency

    Hussain Lalani, MD and Justin Lowenthal 
  • Let’s share our stories about gun violence

    Barbara Meyer, MD, MPH
  • It’s time to seriously study gun violence

    Michael B. Bagg
  • Physicians should never leave the lane of gun violence

    Linda Girgis, MD
  • Gun violence requires medical intervention

    Michael Dorritie
  • Approach the gun violence epidemic like we do with coronavirus

    Charles Nozicka, DO

More in Policy

  • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

    Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN
  • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

    Mohammed Umer Waris, MD
  • Breaking down the barriers to effective bar-code medication administration

    Amy Dang Craft
  • The locums industry has a beef problem

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD
  • Canada’s health workers are sounding the alarm. We must act, now.

    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, PhD
  • Race categorizations are worsening health inequities for the South West Asian North African (SWANA) communities

    Guleer Shahab, MPH
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • Lifestyle change: the forgotten solution in health care

      Tyler Petersen | Conditions
    • An unspoken truth about non-compete clauses in medicine

      Harry Severance, MD | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The teacher who changed my life through reading

      Raymond Abbott | Conditions
    • Revaluating mental health assessments: It’s not just the patient you should consider

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Conditions
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
    • Rescuing primary care: the role of health administrators [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Breaking down barriers: How technology is improving diabetes management in underserved communities

      Anonymous | Conditions
    • From penicillin to digital health: the impact of social media on medicine

      Homer Moutran, MD, MBA, Caline El-Khoury, PhD, and Danielle Wilson | Social media

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 18 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Verbal Skills Better Among Well-Supported Seniors With Depression
  • Declassifying COVID Origin Info; 'Survival Guide for Humanity'; New Quantum Computer
  • Investigational ALS Drug May Have Clinical Benefit, FDA Staff Says
  • Cases of Deadly Fungus Tripled in Past Few Years, CDC Says
  • Small Gains in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Track With Improved Longevity

Meeting Coverage

  • Rapid Improvement in Atopic Dermatitis With Topical PDE4 Inhibitor
  • New Approaches in the Bladder-Sparing Paradigm
  • Response Rates in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Continue to Climb With New Therapies
  • Another Win for a JAK Inhibitor in Alopecia Areata
  • Biologic Switch Revs Up Response in Plaque Psoriasis
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • Lifestyle change: the forgotten solution in health care

      Tyler Petersen | Conditions
    • An unspoken truth about non-compete clauses in medicine

      Harry Severance, MD | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The teacher who changed my life through reading

      Raymond Abbott | Conditions
    • Revaluating mental health assessments: It’s not just the patient you should consider

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Conditions
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
    • Rescuing primary care: the role of health administrators [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Breaking down barriers: How technology is improving diabetes management in underserved communities

      Anonymous | Conditions
    • From penicillin to digital health: the impact of social media on medicine

      Homer Moutran, MD, MBA, Caline El-Khoury, PhD, and Danielle Wilson | Social media

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Use pediatric research to solve the threat of gun violence
18 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...