Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why seminary? Or, why are you non-traditional?

Joshua Niforatos
Education
March 7, 2018
85 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

“Why are you in seminary?”

As a “non-traditional applicant,” I was asked this question on every medical school interview four years ago.

I’ve come to learn that seminary training engenders stereotypes and mythopoeia. My mentors knew this, and advised me to have examples ready related to the importance of being trained in fields that both study the human condition and provide the skill set necessary to critically assess paradigms.

Some interviewers appreciated the importance of understanding humans at the emergent level of culture and religion, though many did not. Many were perplexed by ‘such an unusual detour’ in a non-scientific field. I left a lot of interviews frustrated. As a current fourth-year medical student, I want to explain to those interviewers with more depth the value of this non-traditional route to medicine.

I went to seminary with the desire to eventually attend medical school to become a physician who accompanies underserved populations. As a seminary student at Boston University School of Theology (or, “STH”), I was introduced formally to liberation theology—a branch of Christianity that focuses on social change by making a preferential option for the poor. The methodologies of liberation theology taught me the importance of understanding social injustices with historical depth and geographical breadth. By studying social justice-focused theology, I learned a secular language by which to identify and speak out cogently against social injustice.

Seminary also taught me how to reflexively deconstruct paradigms with academic rigor.

Renowned scholars from philosophical theology and historical theology to ethics and medical anthropology challenged our deeply-held and naïve worldviews daily. At times, it seemed as if we were critiquing every paragraph of books and journal articles. Nothing was immune to deconstruction and critical analysis; no paradigm was so sacrosanct it could not be sacrificed on the altar of skepticism.

In this regard, the rules of the game are a bit different in seminary: the validity of one’s inquiries or ideas were not measured against the hierarchies of eminence. In contradistinction to what I often see tacitly accepted in medicine on the wards or on social media, we did not accept or reject an idea or paradigm or suggestion based on faulty appeals to an individual’s laurels, ranging from number of acronyms after a last name to number of publications on PubMed. Ideas, inquiries, and suggestions were evaluated by logical, theoretical, philosophical, and historical consistency.

Seminary equally emphasized the importance of always assessing what’s at stake for an individual and the community at large with any interaction, with any research, and with any paradigm.

Graduates leave STH influenced by a specific hermeneutic, or the methodology of interpreting human actions and texts. We are taught almost daily throughout our graduate studies to appreciate that one’s perspective is inexorably influenced by one’s privileged and unique social position. For example, my social position is that of a white, cis, heterosexual male in medical school who comes from a well-educated, albeit poor family. My interpretation of religious, philosophical, and historical texts, as well as my interpretation of politics, economics, and ethical principles is influenced by this unique social position. My social position is different and no more important than the social position of my female and LGBTQ classmates who introduced me to cogent, thought-provoking, and meaningful perspectives to which I was not and am not privy.

But how does this pertain to clinical medicine?

After almost four years of medical school and countless patient interactions, I have seen the benefits and the harms of understanding and not understanding, respectively, that the interpretation of patient narratives is similarly influenced by our limited social perspectives. The importance of understanding—or the humility to recognize—the pluralism of our patient populations, as well as our privileged and powerful position in the social hierarchy as health care providers is daily relevant. And finally, reflexively and constantly evaluating, through either elicitation of narrative or vicarious introspection, what’s at stake for the patient insures patients always have a say in their care.

With every year that passes, my narrative of “why I went to seminary” slightly changes. I often wonder if this changing narrative is nothing more than an exercise in historical revisionism, or if my seemingly disparate interests are finally aligning in ways I unable to previously imagine.

As non-traditional applicants begin to put their medical school applications together as the cycle begins again this June, Apple, Inc. founder Steve Jobs’ 2005 commencement speech at Stanford University may help guide you: “You can’t connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards… believing that the dots will connect down the road will give you the confidence to follow your heart even when it leads you off the well-worn path …”6

To my interviewers from over four years ago: when I answered the question of ‘why seminary’ on medical school interviews, I believed there was a connection between caring for both the non-medical and medical needs of patients. I appreciate more profoundly the plurality of cultures and experiences that differ from my own with each patient interaction. My patient interactions after almost four years of medical school corroborate this belief. Seminary also taught me advanced critical thinking, which vaccinated me against subconsciously adopting tacitly-imbued appeals to hierarchies of eminence. And although medical school has done a wonderful job introducing some of the aforementioned principles, a couple dozen lectures is not equivalent to the skill set gained during graduate-level training in the humanities.

To non-traditional applicants who often need to justify the differential value of a diverse background compared to those coming fresh out college with a biology degree, believe that the dots will connect down the road and let that give you the confidence to follow your heart. I hope you find a medical school, as I was fortunate to find at Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, that will allow you to creatively explore connecting these diverse, important dots that will allow you to bring a unique skill set to your patients.

Joshua Niforatos is a medical student.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Do doctors see patients as machines?

March 7, 2018 Kevin 2
…
Next

Commit to a conversation about the gender pay gap

March 7, 2018 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Medical school

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Do doctors see patients as machines?
Next Post >
Commit to a conversation about the gender pay gap

Related Posts

  • 10 tips for non-traditional medical school applicants

    Joe Bardinelli, DO
  • End medical school grades

    Adam Lieber
  • The medical school personal statement struggle

    Sheindel Ifrah
  • Why medical school is like playing defense

    Jamie Katuna
  • Promote a culture of medical school peer education

    Albert Jang, MD
  • The unintended consequences of free medical school

    Anonymous

More in Education

  • Breaking the silence: the truth about mental health challenges among medical students and why medical schools must take action

    Erin Waldrop
  • Breaking the stigma: Encouraging mental health help-seeking in medical trainees

    Anonymous
  • I’m not so different from Lionel Messi – and neither are you

    Lauren Tien
  • 6 ways ChatGPT can help you succeed in medical school

    Drew Bergman
  • Is it time to say goodbye to medical school rankings?

    James Goldchild
  • The unintended consequences of ERAS: Are we losing unique applicants?

    Ank Agarwal, Aditya Narayan, Joshua Leaston, and Akshay Bhamidipati
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A patient’s perspective on the diminishing relationship between doctors and patients

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Unmasking wage disparity in health care: the truth behind the Elmhurst Hospital physician strike

      Kevin Pho, MD | KevinMD
    • Why affirmative action is crucial for health equity and social justice in medicine

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Policy
    • How electronic health records preserve patients’ legacies in the words of oncologists

      Marc Braunstein, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Unmasking the brutal reality of gun violence in America: a call to action for unity and meaningful change

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Policy
    • Emulating Michael Jordan’s winning mindset: a path to success for health care professionals and entrepreneurs

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The growing threat to transgender health care: implications for patients, providers, and trainees

      Carson Hartlage | Policy
    • Breaking point: the 5 reasons American doctors are dreaming of walking away from medicine

      Amol Shrikhande, MD | Physician
    • “Is your surgeon really skilled? The hidden threat to public safety in medicine.

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
    • It’s time to replace the 0 to 10 pain intensity scale with a better measure

      Mark Sullivan, MD and Jane Ballantyne, MD | Conditions
    • Breaking the cycle of racism in health care: a call for anti-racist action

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Policy
    • Revolutionize your practice: the value-based care model that reduces physician burnout

      Chandravadan Patel, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why doctors aren’t to blame for the U.S. opioid crisis [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Raw humanity on night float: inspiring patient encounters and overcoming challenges

      Johnathan Yao, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Is AI the solution for the shortage of nephrologists? ChatGPT weighs in.

      Amol Shrikhande, MD | Tech
    • Unlocking the secrets of cancer conferences: an end-of-life counselor’s journey among pharmaceutical giants

      Althea Halchuck, EJD | Conditions
    • Why HIPAA is failing and what you need to know to protect your data [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Revolutionizing emergency medicine: Overcoming long-term challenges with innovative solutions for physicians and patients

      Anonymous | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • What Drug Did FDA Just Approve for COVID?
  • PET Scan for Alzheimer's Dx; Predicting Colon Cancer Survival
  • What Happens When We Classify Kids' Weight as a 'Disease'?
  • Sotagliflozin Gets FDA's Blessing for Heart Failure
  • Cardiorespiratory Monitoring Can Be Telling of Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Infants

Meeting Coverage

  • No Access to Routine Healthcare Biggest Barrier to HPV Vaccination
  • Trial Results Spark Talk of Curing More Metastatic Cervical Cancers
  • Cross-Border Collaboration Improves Survival in Pediatric Leukemia Patients
  • Monoclonal Antibody Reduced Need For Transfusions in Low-Risk MDS
  • Less-Invasive Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer Proves Safe, Effective
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A patient’s perspective on the diminishing relationship between doctors and patients

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Unmasking wage disparity in health care: the truth behind the Elmhurst Hospital physician strike

      Kevin Pho, MD | KevinMD
    • Why affirmative action is crucial for health equity and social justice in medicine

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Policy
    • How electronic health records preserve patients’ legacies in the words of oncologists

      Marc Braunstein, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Unmasking the brutal reality of gun violence in America: a call to action for unity and meaningful change

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Policy
    • Emulating Michael Jordan’s winning mindset: a path to success for health care professionals and entrepreneurs

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The growing threat to transgender health care: implications for patients, providers, and trainees

      Carson Hartlage | Policy
    • Breaking point: the 5 reasons American doctors are dreaming of walking away from medicine

      Amol Shrikhande, MD | Physician
    • “Is your surgeon really skilled? The hidden threat to public safety in medicine.

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
    • It’s time to replace the 0 to 10 pain intensity scale with a better measure

      Mark Sullivan, MD and Jane Ballantyne, MD | Conditions
    • Breaking the cycle of racism in health care: a call for anti-racist action

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Policy
    • Revolutionize your practice: the value-based care model that reduces physician burnout

      Chandravadan Patel, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why doctors aren’t to blame for the U.S. opioid crisis [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Raw humanity on night float: inspiring patient encounters and overcoming challenges

      Johnathan Yao, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Is AI the solution for the shortage of nephrologists? ChatGPT weighs in.

      Amol Shrikhande, MD | Tech
    • Unlocking the secrets of cancer conferences: an end-of-life counselor’s journey among pharmaceutical giants

      Althea Halchuck, EJD | Conditions
    • Why HIPAA is failing and what you need to know to protect your data [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Revolutionizing emergency medicine: Overcoming long-term challenges with innovative solutions for physicians and patients

      Anonymous | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Why seminary? Or, why are you non-traditional?
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...