Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The psychiatrist as a double agent

Mark Rubinstein, MD
Physician
September 5, 2016
92 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

I was treating John W., a psychiatric patient who was an insurance executive. He was angry about his work situation. He complained bitterly about his supervisor whom he felt singled him out for unfair criticism. Over the course of months, John’s complaints escalated to the point where he said, “I swear … if there was a chance I’d get away with it, I’d love to get rid of the guy.”

I questioned him about this statement. While he acknowledged having a fantasy of “shooting” the supervisor (John didn’t own a weapon), he denied any intent to do any harm to his perceived harasser. He insisted his wish to “get rid of the guy” was merely a figure of speech.

As his treating psychiatrist, I had to make a judgment call about John’s state of mind and his possible intentions.

It’s a well-entrenched principle that when a patient presents an imminent danger to someone else, the therapist has a legal duty to report this threat to the proper authorities. The obligation derives from the now-famous 1976 Tarasoff ruling in California. In that case, the court decided the patient’s privacy and right to confidentiality ends where the public good is impacted in a negative way. A psychiatrist must report a potential threat of harm to another person if violence is considered imminent. Most therapists understand this duty and abide by that common sense legal decision.

But some states have passed strict legislation requiring a therapist to report a patient if it’s likely serious harm may befall someone else. Likely is a far weaker criterion than imminent. The term “likely” is equivalent to “probable” in the law, which means a 51 percent or greater chance of something happening. “Imminent”, on the other hand, means something is about to happen.

And, here lies certain danger.

As a psychiatrist, I treat a variety of people, some of whom are quite disturbed. Others are highly functioning, but have emotional problems. I worry about the possibility of over-reporting patients who might be considered likely to cause harm. The notion of something being likely requires a judgment about anticipating someone’s future actions.

Dr. Richard Milone, chair of the American Psychiatric Association’s Ethics Committee, said, “Your primary job is to be the patient’s doctor. Any time you start being something else to a patient, it’s the start of trouble.” In the wake of the Newtown, Connecticut school shootings, Dr. Milone suggested psychiatrists are now being asked to treat their patients, and also protect society. Or, as another APA Ethics Committee member said, “Society expects us to be their protectors and to work as double agents.”

Such legislation undermines patient confidentiality. Under such laws, can patients truly trust their therapists? Can they really speak their minds without worrying they may cross some subjective line drawn in the therapist’s mind whereby a patient is deemed likely to cause harm and be reported? Yes, a severely delusional person, who believes others are conspiring against him and intends to get a rifle, is someone who should be reported. But an angry, disgruntled man like John W. is apparently using a figure of speech. Should I report him to the authorities because it could be likely he’ll take action?

Can a trusting, confidential therapeutic alliance between psychiatrist and patient ever develop given the requirement that therapists evaluate, predict, and then report patients’ likely behavior?

During a session, there’s no going “off the record.” Everything in therapy is grist for the mill. And now, everything is subject to being evaluated as presaging a patient’s likely behavior.

The recent rash of mass shootings brings important issues about mental health to the fore. But, in the process of trying to get a better handle on how to prevent such horrors, do we really want to turn our therapists into double agents?

Mark Rubinstein is a psychiatrist and author of Bedlam’s Door: True Tales of Madness and Hope.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Is burnout inevitable during medical training?

September 5, 2016 Kevin 17
…
Next

Bedpans to outcomes: Why can't we quantify nursing care?

September 5, 2016 Kevin 10
…

Tagged as: Psychiatry

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Is burnout inevitable during medical training?
Next Post >
Bedpans to outcomes: Why can't we quantify nursing care?

More by Mark Rubinstein, MD

  • Where money and the law intersect, truth can sometimes be the victim

    Mark Rubinstein, MD
  • The integration of psychiatry with neuroscience, biochemistry, and genetics

    Mark Rubinstein, MD

Related Posts

  • A physician’s addiction to social media

    Amanda Xi, MD
  • The double-edged power of the medications we prescribe

    Hans Duvefelt, MD
  • A DEA agent explains how to fight the opioid crisis and mitigate DEA risk

    Dennis Wichern
  • Considering CBD oil? This psychiatrist suggests these questions to ask first.

    Greg Smith, MD
  • CBD: What is it? A former DEA agent explains.

    Dennis Wichern
  • How a physician keynote can highlight your conference

    Kevin Pho, MD

More in Physician

  • From solidarity to co-liberation: Understanding the journey towards ending oppression

    Maiysha Clairborne, MD
  • Finding peace through surrender: a personal exploration

    Dympna Weil, MD
  • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

    Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH
  • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

    Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD
  • How to overcome telemedicine’s biggest obstacles

    Harvey Castro, MD, MBA
  • The patient who became my soulmate

    Anonymous
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the stigma: Addressing the struggles of physicians

      Jean Antonucci, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of misery in medicine: a practical guide

      Paul R. Ehrmann, DO | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Unlock the power of physician compensation data in contract negotiations [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From pennies to attending salaries: Why physicians should teach their kids financial literacy

      Michele Cho-Dorado, MD | Finance
    • From solidarity to co-liberation: Understanding the journey towards ending oppression

      Maiysha Clairborne, MD | Physician
    • Changing the pediatric care landscape: Integrating behavioral and mental health care

      Hilary M. Bowers, MD | Conditions
    • Contract Diagnostics is the only firm 100 percent dedicated to physician contract reviews

      Contract Diagnostics | Sponsored
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 5 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Pregnant, Black? Here's Your Drug Test
  • Progestin-Only Birth Control Linked to Small Increase in Breast Cancer Risk
  • Fatty Acid Tube Feeding May Backfire for Preemie Breathing Disorder
  • Case Reports Detail Vision Loss Linked to Recalled Artificial Tears
  • Admin Trumps Med Students: Anti-Abortion Group Allowed on Campus

Meeting Coverage

  • Outlook for Itchy Prurigo Nodularis Continues to Improve With IL-31 Antagonist
  • AAAAI President Shares Highlights From the 2023 Meeting
  • Second-Line Sacituzumab Govitecan Promising in Platinum-Ineligible UC
  • Trial of Novel TYK2 Inhibitor Hits Its Endpoint in Plaque Psoriasis
  • Durable Vitiligo Responses With Topical Ruxolitinib
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the stigma: Addressing the struggles of physicians

      Jean Antonucci, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of misery in medicine: a practical guide

      Paul R. Ehrmann, DO | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Unlock the power of physician compensation data in contract negotiations [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From pennies to attending salaries: Why physicians should teach their kids financial literacy

      Michele Cho-Dorado, MD | Finance
    • From solidarity to co-liberation: Understanding the journey towards ending oppression

      Maiysha Clairborne, MD | Physician
    • Changing the pediatric care landscape: Integrating behavioral and mental health care

      Hilary M. Bowers, MD | Conditions
    • Contract Diagnostics is the only firm 100 percent dedicated to physician contract reviews

      Contract Diagnostics | Sponsored
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The psychiatrist as a double agent
5 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...