OpenNotes and whether patients should see their medical notes

The opening anecdote of the e-patient white paper tells of a patient who impersonated a doctor in 1994, to get his hands on an article about an operation he was about to have. He got busted. Two years later episode 139 of Seinfeld had something similar – Kramer impersonates a doctor to try to get Elaine’s medical record.

It aired October 17, 1996. It was a turning point in American healthcare: eight weeks earlier the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) had been signed into law, but the full regulations had not yet been written, so when this aired Elaine did not have a legal right to look at her record.

Today she does, but it’s often difficult. Plus, HIPAA regulations allow 30-60 days for providers to deliver, and states can set whatever price they want for the copies. But at least there’s a legal right.

Now, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) is funding a study called OpenNotes to explore taking it a big step further: what happens if patients can see, online, every last bit of what their doctors wrote? Do doctors get overwhelmed with questions? Do patients freak out when they read the medical words that doctors write? Does the world go to hell in a handbasket, as some have worried aloud?

A year ago the Boston Globe voiced those concerns in the lead of an article announcing OpenNotes. Shades of Elaine:

One doctor wrote that a patient was acting paranoid. Another typed that she had ordered tests to make sure a patient didn’t have cancer. Such notes, written in a patient’s medical records after an appointment, can be candid and blunt – at times more so than doctors are to patients face-to-face.

Amid the national push to computerize medical records and make them more open to patients, one of the most intense areas of debate is whether patients should be allowed to see their doctors’ notes online.

It’s taken a year but recently, OpenNotes went live. The press release starts:

With patients across the country voicing a growing desire for greater engagement in and control over their medical care, a new study involving patients in Boston, Pennsylvania and Seattle will examine the impact of adding a new layer of openness to a traditionally one-sided element of the doctor-patient relationship—the notes that doctors record during and after patients’ visits.

Funded through a $1.4 million grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) Pioneer Portfolio—which supports innovative ideas and projects that may lead to important breakthroughs in health and health care—the 12-month OpenNotes© project will evaluate the impact on both patients and physicians of sharing, through online medical record portals, the comments and observations made by physicians after each patient encounter. Approximately 100 primary care physicians and 25,000 patients at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in Boston, Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania, and Harborview Medical Center in Seattle will participate in the 12-month trial.

Beth Israel Deaconess? Why, that’s the hospital where I see my primary Dr. Danny Sands! Not surprisingly, he volunteered to be one of the 100 doctors, and I volunteered to be one of the 25,000 patients.

I spoke about the project with RWJF’s Steve Downs. My view has always been that of course I should be able to see my records: whose data is it, anyway? But Steve points out, correctly, that you can’t shove culture change down people’s throats, so RWJF is spending big bucks to collect evidence.

To the credit of everyone involved, they’re allowing us participants to blog and chat about our participation: “Somebody might come up with good uses for the notes that we haven’t anticipated.” Hallelujah; that’s Web 2.0 / participatory thinking.

Dave deBronkart, also known as e-Patient Dave, blogs at e-Patients.net and is the author of Laugh, Sing, and Eat Like a Pig: How an Empowered Patient Beat Stage IV Cancer and Let Patients Help!

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

  • jsmith

    If I know my patients can read my notes about them, I will write the notes in such a way that they will not be hurtful to them or embarrassing to me. I already do this. How will this affect pt care? I suspect minimally or not at all in family med.

  • Edward Stevenson

    ideally one would have a two tiered note system. A reference medical laboratory I worked for had this in their EMR. the bulk of the record was open to the needed medical personal and contained the expected medical documentation, consents, and caveats. the second tiered notes or “below the line notes” were notations made that were only visible to internal medical personal (but were still subject to court order of course) this second tier section was underdeveloped concepts such as one might write in a practice setting: some possible signs of abuse maintain higher level of suspicion on future visits or malingering suspected. items in other words that aren’t ready to be put in stone but are important nonetheless.

  • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

    This would have been invaluable to my daughter not having cancer spread. I believe it will save lives. When a doctor didn’t read our lab notes (twice) it was costly to us. If I had been able to sign in online and get a look at those lab notes I would have grabbed the phone as quick as possible to find another specialist (and another biopsy eight months earlier than we did. We simply didn’t know the doctor was negligent and, sadly, believed him). OpenNotes would have been a godsend to me.

    I wouldn’t mind if there was a special section for doctor’s only to leave remarks about the patient on a personal level, just let us see the pertinent stuff quickly without having to beg the medical records department to send them to you (I can’t do pick up at the big hospital I use). If a doctor is dealing with an addict I could see why there would be notes about the patient’s anger or manipulation. These *could* be important to the next doctor. Perceptions are just that, but the facts are something the patient should be able to view and with the ease of any doctor.

  • mark

    And then in a few years there will be a new form, not called ‘notes’, where doctors will be able to write down possibly relevant thoughts and notes for his future self and other docs to use.

  • DCPharm

    I have been trying to be my own health advocate & bring notes from one specialist to another to save time. In reviewing these notes, I am finding that things I say as I think they may be pertinent (and are turning out to be) are not even noted. Meanwhile other things are being “cut & pasted” forward to the next visit. In extreme instance, some of this is from direct exam where the exam is not done next visit, but pasted in and level 4 visit billed.. Isn’t that insurance fraud? But I can’t blow whistle because news travels fast in medical community & I won’t get treatment i need.