Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Medical advances can often stir up ethical issues

Alfred Sadler, MD and Blair Sadler, JD
Policy
June 28, 2022
13 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

An excerpt from Pluck: Lessons We Learned for Improving Healthcare and the World, published by Silicon Valley Press.

We met Joseph S. Murtaugh, our new chief at the National Institutes of Health, for the first time on July 3, 1967. He sat behind his desk, looking every bit like Hollywood’s image of a 1960’s civil servant: white button-down shirt, narrow tie, black-rimmed glasses, and short-cropped hair accented with silver at the temples.

We came to know Murtaugh’s brilliance, humility, and unwavering dedication to the American health care enterprise. He jokingly called himself one of “the great unwashed” because, unlike his colleagues with an MD or PhD after their names, he did not hold an advanced degree. Still, his genius was no secret. Murtaugh was easily one of the NIH’s best writers, and he drafted NIH director James Shannon’s annual presentation to Congress, which regularly awarded the NIH more funding than it requested. Whenever the NIH  had a public policy or strategic program issue, it usually fell on Murtaugh’s desk, as director of the Office of Program Planning.

On day one, we arrived in his office as he was grappling with such an issue, and he wanted to talk to us about it. Stacks of papers were piled everywhere. The phones rang constantly. Murtaugh pushed two newspaper clippings toward us. The headlines were “Bare Human Gland Sale” and “Coroner’s Aide Robs Corpses.”

“Gentlemen,” he said, “we have a problem.”

Medical advances can often stir up ethical issues, which ripple into two courts: the court of law and the court of public opinion. These news articles described a public relations nightmare brewing at the National Pituitary Agency (NPA), which operated with NIH funding. Founded in 1963, the NPA had been collecting 72,000 cadaver pituitary glands annually for research purposes. The intent was noble.

Scientists at Johns Hopkins University and other academic institutions extracted human growth hormone (HGH) from the pituitary glands, which were used for NIH-funded clinical trials at various centers around the country. Pediatricians and endocrinologists were studying HGH deficiency in children, which affects one out of every 3,800 newborns and causes hypopituitary dwarfism.

Problems arose in Los Angeles and Minneapolis when some of those glands were taken without consent. When pathology assistants in the local coroners’ offices learned that the NPA would pay two dollars (the equivalent of fifteen dollars in 2022) for pituitary glands, they saw an opportunity to make some extra cash. They started taking cadaver glands without obtaining permission from the next of kin and shipping them to the NPA at Johns Hopkins University. Imagine the public outcry we would hear if people learned that their tax dollars were being used by state medical examiners’ offices to fund research on body parts taken and sold without consent. When this story was exposed in the press in the 1960s, the NPA, along with its funder, the NIH, had to deal with the fallout. Joe Murtaugh told us, “I want you to find out everything you can about the law regarding the  use of cadaver material for medical purposes and figure out what we need to do to assure our grantees comply.”

This was our first assignment as officers in the USPHS. What began as “solving the pituitary problem” led us from the Georgetown Law Library to the Uniform Law Commission, the American Bar Association, Congress, and eventually on a worldwide exploration.

The state laws regulating the treatment of someone’s body after death fell into four categories: autopsy statutes, unclaimed body statutes, medical examiner (or coroner) statutes, and, in some states, organ donation laws. If a death occurred due to homicide or suicide, in an accident, or in a case involving a potential threat to public health, such as an infectious disease or viral pandemic, state laws authorized medical examiners to perform an autopsy to investigate the cause, regardless of the next of kin’s wishes. These laws, however, did not provide examiners with the legal authority to take cadaver organs or tissues for any other purpose, not even altruistic ones, without consent.

Many states permitted the next of kin to authorize an autopsy on the deceased, but autopsy statutes were not so broad that they authorized the procurement of organs and tissue for donation, education, or research. Several states had laws regarding unclaimed bodies, providing that they could be delivered to medical schools and hospitals for educational purposes, but only after a twenty-four-hour waiting period, during which time the hospital was obliged to seek the next of kin.

Many states had recently adopted organ donation laws, but the statutes varied wildly. Forty-one states had statutes that specifically provided authority to individuals to donate all or parts of their body after their death for medical, scientific, or therapeutic purposes. But these statutes ignored the importance of many medical issues, such as the time-sensitivity of organ donation for transplants. Too often, the act of donating was treated as an extension of the distribution of property after death, a process that often took days or weeks, by which time organs were no longer useful for transplantation purposes.

We developed a broader understanding of the laws governing the treatment of dead bodies. Our research helped us discover the nation’s leading health law scholars, and we began making calls. We visited health law leaders around the country. In Pennsylvania, we saw Cyril Wecht, who was an MD, JD, pathologist, and the medical examiner for the city of Pittsburgh. We had found his 1966 publication, “The Medico-Legal Autopsy Laws of the Fifty States and the District of Columbia” to be invaluable.

The scope of our research grew beyond the questions, “What are the current laws regarding dead bodies?” and “How do we assure that NIH grantees abide by them?” to “What should organ donation laws be?”

Alfred Sadler is a physician. Blair Sadler is an attorney. They are the authors of Pluck: Lessons We Learned for Improving Healthcare and the World.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Gun control vs. violent criminal control

June 28, 2022 Kevin 9
…
Next

Medical school loan repayment tips [PODCAST]

June 28, 2022 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Endocrinology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Gun control vs. violent criminal control
Next Post >
Medical school loan repayment tips [PODCAST]

Related Posts

  • Digital advances in the medical aid in dying movement

    Jennifer Lynn
  • How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for social media training in medical education 

    Oscar Chen, Sera Choi, and Clara Seong
  • Sharing mental health issues on social media

    Tarena Lofton
  • The crisis of rotation availability during a pandemic: a medical student’s ethical conundrum

    Amit M. Khan, Javaid Afghani, Taner B. Celebi, and Zachary Scheid
  • How NEJM’s ethical recommendations on the fair allocation of scarce medical resources perpetuate inequity

    Amalia Elvira Gomez-Rexrode and Daniel Rizk
  • Ethical humanism: life after #medbikini and an approach to reimagining professionalism

    Jay Wong

More in Policy

  • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

    Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN
  • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

    Mohammed Umer Waris, MD
  • Breaking down the barriers to effective bar-code medication administration

    Amy Dang Craft
  • The locums industry has a beef problem

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD
  • Canada’s health workers are sounding the alarm. We must act, now.

    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, PhD
  • Race categorizations are worsening health inequities for the South West Asian North African (SWANA) communities

    Guleer Shahab, MPH
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • An unspoken truth about non-compete clauses in medicine

      Harry Severance, MD | Policy
    • Fostering the next (diverse) generation of clinicians

      Imamu Tomlinson, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Healing through love and spirituality

      John T. James, PhD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Rescuing primary care: the role of health administrators [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Breaking down barriers: How technology is improving diabetes management in underserved communities

      Anonymous | Conditions
    • From penicillin to digital health: the impact of social media on medicine

      Homer Moutran, MD, MBA, Caline El-Khoury, PhD, and Danielle Wilson | Social media
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • How to overcome telemedicine’s biggest obstacles

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Investigational ALS Drug May Have Clinical Benefit, FDA Staff Says
  • Cases of Deadly Fungus Tripled in Past Few Years, CDC Says
  • Small Gains in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Track With Improved Longevity
  • Improved OS With Hyperfractionated RT in Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
  • GPT-4 Is Here. How Can Doctors Use Generative AI Now?

Meeting Coverage

  • Rapid Improvement in Atopic Dermatitis With Topical PDE4 Inhibitor
  • New Approaches in the Bladder-Sparing Paradigm
  • Response Rates in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Continue to Climb With New Therapies
  • Another Win for a JAK Inhibitor in Alopecia Areata
  • Biologic Switch Revs Up Response in Plaque Psoriasis
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • An unspoken truth about non-compete clauses in medicine

      Harry Severance, MD | Policy
    • Fostering the next (diverse) generation of clinicians

      Imamu Tomlinson, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Healing through love and spirituality

      John T. James, PhD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Rescuing primary care: the role of health administrators [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Breaking down barriers: How technology is improving diabetes management in underserved communities

      Anonymous | Conditions
    • From penicillin to digital health: the impact of social media on medicine

      Homer Moutran, MD, MBA, Caline El-Khoury, PhD, and Danielle Wilson | Social media
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • How to overcome telemedicine’s biggest obstacles

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...