Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Should drug testing be considered screening tests?

Chris Rangel, MD
Conditions
July 12, 2013
49 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

cropped-clean_urine

Tests like cholesterol levels are considered screening tests because they are cost effective, have high sensitivities (a low rate of false negatives), and have been proven to be beneficial in the identification of conditions that may require treatment before symptoms occur. The vast majority of medical tests are not considered to be “screening” because they violate one or more of these principles, i.e. they are expensive, have lower sensitivities (higher rates of false negatives), lower specificities (higher rates of false positives), and/or have not been proven to be beneficial for testing large populations that do not have any signs or symptoms of the condition being tested for.

Urine or blood testing for illicit substances falls into the latter category. Even though they are inexpensive and easy to perform, drug testing should not be thought of nor used as a true screening test. For one thing, although drug testing is effective at helping to rule out illicit drug use, the problem comes from knowing how to interpret the results of a positive test. None of these tests are 100% specific and so the possibility of a false positive exists meaning that a positive drug test does not equal illicit drug use.

The problem of a false positive test is frequently encountered in the practice of medicine. Depending on the clinical circumstances and the nature of the initial test, follow up evaluation with more expensive and possibly more invasive testing is often required in order to verify the results. For example, an abnormality found on the chest x-ray of a smoker with a bad cough requires further evaluation. A CT scan of the chest, bronchoscopy, and even a needle biopsy to obtain a tissue sample for analysis are required before making a diagnosis of lung cancer and starting treatment.

However, the possibility of a false positive drug screen and the need for further testing and evaluation is rarely considered outside the context of clinical practice. Employers, school administrators, government agencies, and law enforcement can and do consider a positive drug test to be perfectly equivalent to an admission of illicit drug use. This frequently results in the administration of some form of punishment or corrective action being delivered without giving the accused the right to defend themselves in any way. Essentially, drug testing is an effective way to violate a person’s right to due process since most drug screening is managed by lay people in non-clinical roles who believe that drug testing is 100% reliable.  But this would be the same absurdity as giving chemotherapy to the smoker with the abnormal chest x-ray without first trying to verify the diagnosis with further evaluation (due process).

The other problem comes from the mass drug testing of large numbers of people (either random or at the initial point of contact). The interpretation of the results of a medical test are never as simple as positive or negative. The statistical probability of a false positive or a false negative result must be considered in concert with the pretest probability. The pretest probability is the likelihood that a patient really has the condition being tested for based on such things as risk factors for the disease, their prior history, and signs or symptoms of the disease. The pretest probability heavily influences a physician’s decision on whether or not to proceed with further testing or treatment. For example, the pretest probability for a pulmonary embolism (blood clot to the lungs) is going to be far higher for an 80-year-old heavy smoker with a history of advanced prostate cancer who presents with shortness of breath and blood tinged sputum then it will be for an 18-year-old non smoker with nasal congestion, a cough, and bad allergies and even though both patients can have clear chest x-rays. Essentially, doctors “profile” their patients.

Employers, school administrators, and government agencies fear being accused of discrimination far more than they worry about a person’s due process rights. So everyone is tested without regard to risk factors, a history of, or signs or symptoms of illicit drug use. Since the vast majority of any given general population do not use illicit drugs, their overall pretest probability for drug testing is going to be lower which means that any positive results have a higher chance of being a false positive. This principle was clearly demonstrated when a Pittsburgh woman was paid $143,500 to settle a lawsuit she filed after her 3 day old daughter was taken away by child protective services based on a drug screen that was positive for narcotics. It turns out that the hospital where she delivered her daughter routinely performs drug screens on every pregnant woman at delivery and all positive results are reported to the county CPS. The woman claims to have eaten a poppy seed bagel in the days before the test that caused the positive result. More importantly however, is the fact that there did not appear to be any reason to test this woman. By all accounts, no one suspected her of being a heroin addict.

This drug testing hysteria got it’s start in the 1980s alone with “just say no,” “this is your brain on drugs,” and the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988. Originally testing was limited to high risk professions such as the transportation industry but it spread to everything else under the guise of combating lost productivity as a result of drug abuse. Basically, the Federal government expanded it’s monitoring of what you could put into your body to both at home and at work.

However, there is no hard proof that drug testing itself decreases drug use, improves safety, or increases productivity. Drug testing entities simply don’t realize that the vast majority of testing is not needed, is a waste of time and money, is not effective in reducing drug abuse, and may leave them at a higher liability risk when they don’t know how to deal with the possibility of a false positive.

Chris Rangel is an internal medicine physician who blogs at RangelMD.com.

Prev

Health care price transparency should receive bipartisan support

July 12, 2013 Kevin 3
…
Next

How to evaluate health websites

July 12, 2013 Kevin 6
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Health care price transparency should receive bipartisan support
Next Post >
How to evaluate health websites

More by Chris Rangel, MD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Are Cadillac plans responsible for rising health costs?

    Chris Rangel, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Are hospitals really soaking the poor with high prices?

    Chris Rangel, MD
  • How doctors will use Google Glass

    Chris Rangel, MD

More in Conditions

  • Overcoming the lies of depression: Senator John Fetterman’s struggle with mental health

    Harvey Max Chochinov, MD, PhD
  • Proposed USPSTF guideline update: Advocating for earlier breast cancer screening at age 40

    Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
  • The rising threat of lung cancer in Asian American female nonsmokers

    Alice S. Y. Lee, MD
  • Urgent innovation needed to address growing mental health crisis among children and families

    Monika Roots, MD
  • The importance of listening in health care: a mother’s journey advocating for children with chronic Lyme disease

    Cheryl Lazarus
  • The unjust reality of racial disparities in pediatric kidney transplants

    Lien Morcate
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Is chaos in health care leading us towards socialized medicine? How physician burnout is a catalyst.

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Boxing legends Tyson and Foreman: powerful lessons for a resilient and evolving health care future

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • A physician’s typical day, as envisioned by a non-clinician health care MBA: a satire

      Jennifer Lycette, MD | Physician
    • Revealing America’s expansion: the dark truth of Native American suffering and unjustified abuses

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The tragic story of Mr. G: a painful journey towards understanding suicide

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Decoding name displays in health care: Privacy, identification, and compliance unveiled

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • “Is your surgeon really skilled? The hidden threat to public safety in medicine.

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
    • Revolutionize your practice: the value-based care model that reduces physician burnout

      Chandravadan Patel, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of racism in health care: a call for anti-racist action

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Policy
    • Unveiling the hidden damage: the secretive world of medical boards

      Alan Lindemann, MD | Physician
    • An inspiring tribute to an exceptional radiologist who made a lasting impact

      Kim Downey, PT | Conditions
    • Proactive risk management: a game-changer in preventing physician burnout

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Physician employment contracts: the key to fighting burnout and improving working conditions [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • A tense family drama unfolds as a young daughter pursues unconventional career path

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • Decoding the brain’s decision-making: insights for medical professions and strategies for success

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Unmasking the truth: the shocking reality of the opioid epidemic and who’s really to blame

      Jay K. Joshi, MD | Physician
    • Discover your true north: Navigating life’s confusions and embracing your path to success

      Tyler Jorgensen, MD | Physician
    • A revolution in patient empowerment: Working together to save our medical system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Insomnia Symptoms Tied to Stroke a Decade Later
  • Studies Question Role of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in First-Line Advanced Breast Cancer
  • Full-On Reversal of Cardiac Amyloidosis Possible With Antibodies
  • Spell Check-Up: Do You Have the Skills to Pass This Spelling Test?
  • For Some, Sex Is Better Sleep Aid Than Pill, Small Survey Finds

Meeting Coverage

  • Studies Question Role of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in First-Line Advanced Breast Cancer
  • For Some, Sex Is Better Sleep Aid Than Pill, Small Survey Finds
  • Skipping Radiotherapy 'Seems Safe' for PMBCL Patients in Remission
  • Promising Gene Therapy for Overactive Bladder
  • Shotgun Sequencing of Small Intestine Reveals Species Tied to GI Symptom Severity
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Is chaos in health care leading us towards socialized medicine? How physician burnout is a catalyst.

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Boxing legends Tyson and Foreman: powerful lessons for a resilient and evolving health care future

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • A physician’s typical day, as envisioned by a non-clinician health care MBA: a satire

      Jennifer Lycette, MD | Physician
    • Revealing America’s expansion: the dark truth of Native American suffering and unjustified abuses

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The tragic story of Mr. G: a painful journey towards understanding suicide

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Decoding name displays in health care: Privacy, identification, and compliance unveiled

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • “Is your surgeon really skilled? The hidden threat to public safety in medicine.

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
    • Revolutionize your practice: the value-based care model that reduces physician burnout

      Chandravadan Patel, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of racism in health care: a call for anti-racist action

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Policy
    • Unveiling the hidden damage: the secretive world of medical boards

      Alan Lindemann, MD | Physician
    • An inspiring tribute to an exceptional radiologist who made a lasting impact

      Kim Downey, PT | Conditions
    • Proactive risk management: a game-changer in preventing physician burnout

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Physician employment contracts: the key to fighting burnout and improving working conditions [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • A tense family drama unfolds as a young daughter pursues unconventional career path

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • Decoding the brain’s decision-making: insights for medical professions and strategies for success

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Unmasking the truth: the shocking reality of the opioid epidemic and who’s really to blame

      Jay K. Joshi, MD | Physician
    • Discover your true north: Navigating life’s confusions and embracing your path to success

      Tyler Jorgensen, MD | Physician
    • A revolution in patient empowerment: Working together to save our medical system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Should drug testing be considered screening tests?
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...