Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

It’s time for a VBAC court

Amy Tuteur, MD
Physician
October 18, 2011
110 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

We understand the problem: the VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean) rate is too low. It’s time for a bold solution. We need a “VBAC Court.”

VBAC is a safe option for most women, and almost 3/4 of women who opt a VBAC will deliver vaginally and avoid another C-section. But we also know that approximately 0.8% of women attempting VBAC will end up with a ruptured uterus, a catastrophic complication that threatens the life of both baby and mother. And we know that 10% of these babies will die or experience severe neurologic impairment.

In other words, 0.08% of babies will die or be profoundly brain damaged. It is a small risk, on the order of many other risks accepted in pregnancy. Why are the other risks accepted, and the risk of VBAC increasingly considered unacceptable by malpractice insurers, hospitals and obstetricians (who are often at the mercy of malpractice insurers and hospitals who set the rules under which they work)?

There are two main reasons:

1. We KNOW that some babies will die or be left brain damaged. Only 0.08% of babies (80/100,000) sounds like a small number until you consider how many women are suitable VBAC candidates. Nearly 400,000 women have repeat C-sections each year. Not all are candidates for VBAC, but most are. With a liberal VBAC policy, therefore, we KNOW that more than 200 babies will die or be rendered brain damaged each and every year.

2. In each and every one of those deaths, attempted VBAC will be the definitive proximate cause of death or injury. Therefore, there is no way to legally defend these cases. And despite the fact that women sign elaborate informed consent agreements prior to attempting a VBAC, when disaster occurs, many sue and claim that they didn’t really understand the risk, and they win.

Not surprisingly, malpractice insurers, hospitals and obstetricians do not want to deliberately take on the KNOWN risk that some proportion of babies WILL inevitably die or be left brain damaged by a VBAC, and they will be left open to major lawsuits and multimillion dollar payouts.

It sounds like an insoluble problem until you consider that it is not the only problem of this type. It is almost exactly the same dilemma faced by vaccine manufacturers. They make a product that saves lives on a massive scale, but we KNOW that a tiny percentage of children who receive vaccines WILL die or be rendered neurologically impaired. The parents will sue and they will win because, the vaccine is the proximate cause of the death or disability. Vaccine manufacturers announced that they would simply stop producing vaccines because of inevitable lawsuits.

The government stepped in and created the Vaccine Court.

Though it is knows as the “Vaccine Court,” it is, in reality, the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Its creation rests on the premise that some deaths from vaccines are inevitable and that lawsuits are a cumbersome, inefficient means of addressing that reality. The Vaccine Court is a form of no-fault insurance. It allows parents and children to receive compensation for death and injuries without filing a lawsuit. It allows vaccine manufacturers to continue supplying vaccines without defending lawsuits over the vaccine reactions that we KNOW will result in a small amount of deaths each year.

The Vaccine Court is part of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program:

On October 1, 1988, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). The VICP was established to ensure an adequate supply of vaccines, stabilize vaccine costs, and establish and maintain an accessible and efficient forum for individuals found to be injured by certain vaccines. The VICP is a no-fault alternative to the traditional tort system for resolving vaccine injury claims that provides compensation to people found to be injured by certain vaccines…

The Vaccine Court works. Each year tens of millions of dollars are paid out to the few families affected by vaccine related death or neurologic injury.

It’s time for a VBAC Court, for the exact same reasons that the Vaccine Court was created. VBAC, like vaccination, is public health good. A liberal VBAC policy would reduces unnecessary surgeries, surgical complications, and health care costs. A VBAC Court, by instituting a no fault program for the VBAC related deaths and injuries that we KNOW will occur, will indemnify hospitals and doctors against lawsuits in the same way that the Vaccine Court indemnifies vaccine manufacturers against lawsuits. VBACs will be readily available, just as vaccines are now readily available.

Frankly, I see no other solution to the problem. Malpractice insurers, hospitals and doctors cannot and will not take on the massive liability posed by VBAC. There is currently no way to accurately predict which women will suffer a uterine rupture during VBAC and there is no accurate prediction method on the horizon. Future developments may reduce the number of babies who die or are left neurologically impaired by VBAC, but that number will never be zero.

If we want to increase the VBAC rate — and patients, doctors and health insurers very much want to increase the VBAC rate — we have no choice but to institute a no fault compensation plan.

It’s time for a VBAC Court.

Amy Tuteur is an obstetrician-gynecologist who blogs at The Skeptical OB.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

Prev

Sexual harassment in the medical workplace

October 18, 2011 Kevin 11
…
Next

Why nursing homes need more doctors on site

October 19, 2011 Kevin 19
…

Tagged as: Malpractice, Specialist

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Sexual harassment in the medical workplace
Next Post >
Why nursing homes need more doctors on site

More by Amy Tuteur, MD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    I am so glad that you have chosen me to be your guide

    Amy Tuteur, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    What breastfeeding and sex have in common

    Amy Tuteur, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    What is defensive medicine in obstetrics?

    Amy Tuteur, MD

More in Physician

  • The harmful effects of shaming patients for self-education

    Maryanna Barrett, MD
  • The power of self-appreciation: Why physicians need to start acknowledging their own contributions

    Wendy Schofer, MD
  • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

    Alexandra Kharazi, MD
  • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD
  • The dark side of medicine: an urgent call to action against greed

    Don Gaede, MD
  • Dr. Glaucomflecken for president!

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Amy Bissada, DO & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • The Titanic sinking: a metaphor for the impending collapse of medicine

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD & Shreekant Vasudhev, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Surviving clinical rounds: tips and tales from a pediatric hematologist-oncologist [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The harmful effects of shaming patients for self-education

      Maryanna Barrett, MD | Physician
    • The power of self-appreciation: Why physicians need to start acknowledging their own contributions

      Wendy Schofer, MD | Physician
    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 10 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Abortion Is Not Murder in the Eyes of the Law
  • Introducing Allergenic Foods Early Tied to a Reduction in Later Allergies
  • Isotretinoin REMS Still Needed, But Its Burden Could Be Reduced, FDA Staff Says
  • Children Do Well With Fewer Opiates After Surgery
  • High Out-of-Pocket Costs Tied to Less Follow-Up After Initial Mammography

Meeting Coverage

  • Children Do Well With Fewer Opiates After Surgery
  • Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions
  • Orismilast Clears Skin in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis
  • New Combinations Promising in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
  • No Survival Benefit With CRT Versus Chemo for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • The Titanic sinking: a metaphor for the impending collapse of medicine

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD & Shreekant Vasudhev, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Surviving clinical rounds: tips and tales from a pediatric hematologist-oncologist [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The harmful effects of shaming patients for self-education

      Maryanna Barrett, MD | Physician
    • The power of self-appreciation: Why physicians need to start acknowledging their own contributions

      Wendy Schofer, MD | Physician
    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

It’s time for a VBAC court
10 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...