More screening isn’t necessarily better

October 31, 2007

A mantra I have been preaching for some time. Some untoward effects from newborn screening are starting to be realized:

The recent adoption of widespread screening of newborns for congenital health problems is saving thousands of lives every year, identifying potentially deadly conditions in time to begin treatment. But now, health-care professionals recognize that success has highlighted glitches in the system.

More screening has meant more potential for erroneous test results and misdiagnoses, causing needless angst for parents. Doctors and hospital officials, who must inform new parents about the screening process, are often ill-informed about the diseases that are screened for and how they are treated. And once a diagnosis is confirmed, families may get little follow-up as they struggle with the overwhelming rigors of caring for their sick infant.

(via Schwitzer)



Related posts:

  1. Should I get a PSA test for prostate cancer? A new study shows that screening for prostate cancer doesn’t necessarily save lives
  2. Cholesterol screening in kids
  3. 15 cancer screening posts you may have missed
  4. Medicaid cancer screening
  5. "The best test isn’t necessarily the one that finds the most cancer"
  6. Screening embryos for breast cancer
  7. Motives behind CT screening


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Write 200 prescriptions for a car

Next post: Marcus Welby is dead

Site Meter