Medical Economics examines the benefits and risks:
“Studies show that patients forget half of what we tell them during office visits,” Volpe continues. “Or they might have more questions than we can deal with in a short visit. The printout of the chart notes that I give them not only has my diagnosis, follow-up recommendations, and referral information, it facilitates Internet research about particular illnesses because it contains terms related to patients’ medical problems.”
(via The Medical Quack)
Related posts:
- Does it matter how doctors give patients their diagnosis?
- Too much information?
- Googling the diagnosis – touching off a firestorm
- Tell patients to stop smoking, or get sued
- Sparse specialist notes
- Why patients wait so long in the doctor’s office
- How much access should patients have to their medical record?
KevinMD.com on Facebook
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







{ 1 comment }
For every problem that predates the computer, there is a proven cheap low-tech solution.
Many years ago I learned the remarkable uses of carbon paper. A carbon came with my lab, so I filed one and gave one to the patient. Regarding notes, I leaned to write my note on a clipboard with a sheet of carbon paper behind. I could then give the entire carbon to the patient (rarely) or the lower portion with the diagnosis and recommendations (usually) to the patient. For more complex discussions of recommendations. I picked up a clipboard with stationary over a carbon set, and just wrote them out as I spoke, and then gave the patient the top sheet and filed the carbon.
Simple, cheap, no electricity, encryption, password, backup server, service contract, software updates, or legacy data conversion required.
I still believe that the only major advantage of EMR for the actual practice is in big practices where you save the expense of filing and retrieving charts. For the small office the only advantage of any import is the anticipated future opportunity to the government and insurance companies of violating the autonomy and privacy of patients and physicians for their own purposes.
Comments on this entry are closed.