"Nothing to lose by getting a CT scan"

April 11, 2007

Of course, this radiology ad left out some important caveats such as “the $1,200 fee may not be covered by their insurance, or that incidental findings that require further testing may ultimately found to be benign.”

Virtual colonoscopies, and CT screening for lung cancer and heart disease are not ready for routine use yet.



Related posts:

  1. "A CT scan in hand is far better then no CT scan or biopsy at all"
  2. Lung cancer CT screening produces false positives and isn’t ready for prime time
  3. Motives behind CT screening
  4. Demand a CT scan
  5. "The distinction between survival and mortality cuts to the heart of the screening debate"
  6. How accurate is a colonoscopy to screen for colon cancer?
  7. How does cancer screening cause harm?


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Laughlin April 12, 2007 at 5:22 am

There is an estimated risk of approximately 1:500 of causing cancer from a full body CT (of course dependant on the age of the patient). This figure is a guess – no-one really knows. As for the germ-line – again, no-one really knows…
Nothing to lose? Whoever wrote that advert needs their avarice lobe resected.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Lowering the PSA threshold for financial gain?

Next post: Physician attire and malpractice

Site Meter