Bard-Parker responds to Angell’s recent Boston Globe piece, giving some cons for increased patient empowerment:
The patients who are motivated and resourceful enough to make their decisions with the limited help provided can thrive. Unfortunately not all patients have the resources, time or motivation to do so. They oftentimes make the wrong choice. Those that can afford it may seek out a “concierge” environment. Others may be swayed by the information to seek alternative therapies.
Related posts:
- Is concierge medicine partly patient-driven?
- The unintended consequences of free HIV screening at hospitals
- Is it wrong to send delinquent patient accounts to collections?
- Does EBM apply to complementary therapy?
- The unintended consequences of preventing patient falls
- USA Today op-ed: Medicare’s never events and the unintended consequences affecting patient care
- Does alternative medicine work? Or does it harm patients?
KevinMD.com on Facebook
Comments on this entry are closed.