The first doctor who treated the Cheney gunshot victim wanted to send him home:
According to the afternoon daily, located about 60 miles from the shooting site, the first doctor to treat Whittington immediately after the Saturday shooting contended that his wounds were superficial and not in need of further hospitalization.“If it were just a normal citizen, he would have sent him home with antibiotics,” said Ofelia Hunter, Echo-News Journal editor, who talked to the doctor. “He felt that it was more royal treatment that he was getting.”
Hunter’s comments referred to Dr. Raj Subnani, who treated Whittington at the Christus Spohn Hospital in Kingsville where he was first taken before being transferred to the Christus Spohn Hospital Memorial in Corpus Christi, where he remains.
Hunter, who plans to run a story about Subnani this afternoon, said she interviewed the doctor Monday. The editor, who is one of three newsroom staffers at the paper, indicated that the doctor was not in favor of transferring Whittington because he did not believe he required further hospitalization.
“He felt he was transferred because of his prominence, and that he was already stable,” Hunter said. “It was more because of who he was.” That is in marked contrast to reports in most major newspapers that Whittington required intensive care treatment, was hit with more than 100 pellets, and that some of the wounds were so severe the pellets could not be removed.
Related posts:
- Futile care
- Primary care woes in Canada
- Doctor of osteopathy: Does the media know what they do?
- A string of complications
- Playing the doctor card
- A cancer patient has his Xbox stolen while he was in the hospital
- JAMA and drug ads
{ 5 comments }
I would probably have ordered a CT of head , neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis and this would have taken only a few minutes. Had this been done, they would have realized that there is a pellet in his heart that resulted in a “minor heart attack”. Not that it would have changed the outcome. One more good reason to practice defensive medicine.
I’m just a stupid pediatrician, so could one of you smart guys out there explain to me how a piece of buckshot that “migrates to the heart” causes a heart attack?
It’s not DM to do a thorough survey on a 78 -year old who’s just been shot.
Flea
Flea, my understanding is that the foreign body irritated the tissue and caused atrial fibrillation.
Anonymous, apparently they did all those things. They said the metallic BB, however, causes an image artifact which prevents it’s precise localization.
flea,
From just what I have heard on the radio, I don’t know the specifics or if he really had a heart attack. I have seen cases where buckshot has been able to enter the venous system and embolized at a later time. Theoretically, if there was a patent foramen ovale it can enter the left side and embolize to a coronary artery??
Comments on this entry are closed.