Primary care isn’t broken. It needs a better support system.

Primary care is at the heart of each and every health care system. Effective and efficient primary care leads to positive health outcomes across the board, most notably lower rates of mortality and hospitalization, and higher life expectancy. But to achieve such results, primary care needs an integrated system to support efficient care delivery.

Despite the diligent work performed every minute by doctors, nurses, and other clinicians, the lack of an integrated support system can ultimately lead to failure in patient care. The coronavirus pandemic has only accentuated the need for a support system that can make primary care more effective and resilient. A system dynamic and flexible enough to support people at home, minimize interaction and wait times, empower patients to take control of their own care, and independently monitor chronic conditions by bringing the right care to them in the right way at the right time.

A recent article by Julie Yoo of Andreessen Horowitz bemoans the brokenness of a health care system incapable of supporting primary care.  According to Yoo, primary care’s very broad mandate—“the one-stop-shop we rely on for all of our general health care needs”—has left it overburdened and crumbling.

Primary care isn’t broken, but it’s missing a smart and integrated system to support it. That system should enable service line management, create pathways tailored to each individual patient and what ails them, and funnel patients to the nodes relevant to them.

Matching patients with the right care setting

Primary care clinics typically adapt to the populations they serve. For example, if most patients in a given practice are young and healthy, that clinic will likely focus on primary prevention, acute care, and treatment for mild chronic diseases. That practice would probably be less suited to serving patients with complex multisystem chronic diseases and social comorbidities. Such patients would better achieve their health goals in an expanded practice that includes a community health worker, clinical pharmacologist, social worker, and other specialist team members on staff.

Rather than grouping everyone in a one-size-fits-all primary care waiting room, patients need a system that will match their unique needs with the ideal care setting, taking into account the staffing, equipment, and experience level of each option.

A mismatch between a patient’s needs and a clinic’s ability to address them can lead to care delivery that fails to result in the intended health outcome. A patient with a simple UTI may not need to wait an hour in a waiting room while other patients with complex problems see the doctor. On the other hand, a patient with complex medical and social issues may not receive the support that they need in an urgent care clinic.

While variety is a defining characteristic of primary care, an integrated health care system that efficiently routes patients to the most appropriate primary care setting can help usher in better health outcomes and experiences for both patients and their doctors. While this ideal is subject to variations in resources in a given geographic location, it is nevertheless one that we can strive for.

Shifting primary care outside the primary care office

In her article, Yoo advocated for an “unbundling” of primary care. Recognizing patient diversity goes beyond treating them in the clinic best tailored to their needs. The entire patient journey should be reimagined, with new pathways that shift care outside of the traditional clinical setting towards personalized primary care. Low-risk conditions that are easily diagnosed and treated can be directed to telemedicine resources, with more involved ailments routed to primary care physicians or urgent care. Even more complex ailments and social situations require the involvement of a care team.

Similar to the stratification of everyday communication—in which we send text messages, place voice or video calls, or meet in person, depending on how and what we want to communicate—patients should be able to connect with primary care in the way that is most appropriate for their concerns.

Remote care services have increasingly turned patients’ homes into care sites, a preferable option for patients vulnerable to face-to-face interactions. This is also happening organically in the form of direct to consumer telemedicine companies, rapidly expanding in the USA, offering niche low-risk treatments, such as UTI management, hair loss medication, acne treatment, and more. Patients have enthusiastically embraced such services to avoid waiting rooms.

Seamless, consumer-facing solutions can match people with the most appropriate care, with minimal effort on their part and no compromise in the quality of care. Empowering people to receive care within a home setting and at their convenience, is a proven way to activate patients, granting them control and tools to manage their health with personally tailored interventions.

Remote care is especially important today for people with chronic conditions for whom exposure to COVID-19 is dangerous but whose conditions should not go unchecked, or for other immunosuppressed groups like pregnant women.

Primary care at a crossroads

As the COVID-19 curve flattens in some countries, this is an opportune moment to take stock of lessons learned and better prepare for the future. The growing adoption of remote care over the past few months has the potential to transform primary care in the long term.

We should aspire to emerge from this crisis with new, patient-centric approaches that improve the experiences of both patients and doctors and optimize care for patients across the care continuum. We need to design and optimize systems that understand who our patients are and direct them to the most efficient next step in their care.

Jonah Mink is a family physician.

Image credit:

View 1 Comments >

Most Popular

✓ Join 150,000+ subscribers
✓ Get KevinMD's most popular stories