Deductive reasoning in medical malpractice: a quantitative approach
Conventionally, medical malpractice is argued using inductive reasoning. There is nothing wrong with inductive reasoning. It is a component of critical thinking. However, it is just a component. Inductive reasoning is more subjective than objective and the influences of selection bias, avoidance bias, and confirmation bias are undetectable.
Deductive reasoning is also a component of critical thinking. It is not immune from these same biases; however, deductive reasoning is more robust …









![AI censorship threatens the lifeline of caregiver support [PODCAST]](https://kevinmd.com/wp-content/uploads/Design-2-190x100.jpg)
