Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Revolutionizing vascular surgery: How embracing endovascular techniques saved the specialty

Frank Veith, MD
Physician
February 15, 2023
7 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

An excerpt from The Medical Jungle: A Pioneering Surgeon’s Battle to Revolutionize Vascular Care and Challenge the Medical Mafia.

Still no matter what anyone said, I knew in my heart that endovascular grafts and endovascular aneurysm repair were going to be a game-changer and that vascular surgeons had to get involved to prevent interventional specialists from taking the lead in this technology. In other words, if vascular surgeons did not embrace endovascular skills and techniques, they would rapidly be replaced by interventionalists in cardiology and radiology, and vascular surgery would become diminished or extinct as a specialty. We would be out of the game. And I did not want this to happen.

I made this point most emphatically in 1996 as the president of the Society for Vascular Surgery. My presidential address to the esteemed SVS was titled: “Charles Darwin and Vascular Surgery.” It was a speech that certainly went against the grain as it dealt with the evolution of vascular surgery and how we had to change and evolve as a specialty in order to survive and prosper.

For starters, you might wonder: What was the possible relevance Darwin, the famous English naturalist and the father of the theory of evolution, could have to vascular surgery?!

I first recounted Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection, first formulated in his book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. In this classic volume, published first in 1859, Darwin pointed out the process by which organisms change over time as a result of changes in heritable physical or behavioral traits. Changes that allow an organism to better adapt to its environment will help it survive and have more offspring.

Using Darwin’s work as a metaphor, I likened specialties to species and indicated that medical specialties, like species, had to evolve and become different from their ancestors if they were to avoid extinction and survive. I also made three predictions and associated recommendations for future survival adaptations. Two of these recommendations proved to be unworkable or unsuccessful. One proved to be remarkably right.

One errant recommendation was that we work collaboratively and congenially with interventional radiologists or cardiologists in dedicated vascular centers. The idea was that we could learn from one another, sharing our skill sets for the betterment of all. That kumbaya recommendation proved unworkable because of medical tribalism, competitive human nature, and greed. The three specialties involved in treating blood vessels—vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and interventional cardiologists—all wanted to be dominant and in control of patients and the resultant dollars earned.

A second recommendation was that vascular surgery become more independent as a specialty, separate from general and cardiac surgery, just like the specialties of neurosurgery, orthopedics, urology, obstetrics and gynecology, plastic surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery.

As I wrote: “Vascular Surgery’s evolution and separation are inevitable because its members are better adapted, more ‘fit’ by virtue of training and experience to care for vascular disease patients … Darwin would predict that forces of evolution will result in the distinct separation of our specialty … which would eliminate much conflict of interest and probably be best for all concerned,” most notably the vascular patients that we served.

With that point in mind, I knew that we, as vascular surgeons, needed to separate administratively and gain an American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS)–recognized governing board and Residency Review Committee (RRC). A vigorous attempt to accomplish this was made between 1996 and 2007, but failed. As a result, vascular surgery still remains a subservient subspecialty in North America, although it is not in most other parts of the civilized world.

My third recommendation in 1996 was prophetic and fared better. I predicted an endovascular revolution and recommended that vascular surgeons had to become competent in all endovascular techniques, embracing and practicing these new techniques. Otherwise, they would risk extinction.

In this 1996 address, I predicted that within ten years, 40 percent to 70 percent of the open operations we were then doing would be replaced by endovascular procedures. And many of the remaining “open” operations would be improved and simplified by using the endovascular adjuncts that were available (such as catheters, guidewires, sheaths, digital fluoroscopy, balloons, stents, and EVGs). All this certainly turned out to be true in spades!

Accordingly, in this 1996 address I recommended that vascular surgeons, if they wished to survive, had to become endo-competent, acquiring catheter-guidewire-imaging skills that would enable them to perform all sorts of endovascular treatments.

Although this recommendation was greeted with disdain and strongly resisted by many senior vascular surgeons at the time, this resistance was gradually overcome. Our specialty has embraced the endovascular revolution and become endo-competent. This is why vascular surgery is doing as well as it is today. Indeed, vascular surgeons often lead in developing many of the evolving endovascular procedures that are currently the standard of care.

Yet this speech, like the one two years before, was greeted as far-fetched and wrong-headed by many of the vascular leaders of the day—certainly by the older ones. But no matter. Here it is twenty-six years later and up to 80 to 95 percent of all vascular lesions are or will be best treated by endovascular means, though some vascular patients still require open operations.

Frank Veith is a vascular surgeon and author of The Medical Jungle: A Pioneering Surgeon’s Battle to Revolutionize Vascular Care and Challenge the Medical Mafia.

Prev

Navigating institutional betrayal in health care [PODCAST]

February 14, 2023 Kevin 0
…
Next

Lessons from a civil rights icon: How to lift as we climb

February 15, 2023 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Surgery

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Navigating institutional betrayal in health care [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Lessons from a civil rights icon: How to lift as we climb

Related Posts

  • Why cataract surgery is more complicated than it should be

    Brian C. Joondeph, MD
  • Robotic surgery’s impact on training the next generation of surgeons

    Barry Greene, MD
  • Women in surgery: a tweet to action

    Sarah Shubeck, MD and Arielle Kanters, MD
  • Americans and Canadians use more post-surgery opioid pain pills

    Julie Appleby
  • The necessity for the globalization of surgery and its barriers

    Jeremy Goodwin
  • This patient got an estimate before surgery. The bill was so much more.

    Rachel Bluth

More in Physician

  • Breaking the cycle of failure in modern medicine

    Kortney West, MD
  • From license to loneliness: the dilemma of retired physicians

    Richard Plotzker, MD
  • Unlearning our habits: a journey from intelligence to wisdom

    Brian Sayers, MD
  • Beyond pizza and pens: National Doctors’ Day should be about saving lives

    James Young, MD
  • Maximizing physician potential: How coaching can aid in conflict resolution, enhance health care leadership and build stronger teams

    Asha Padmanabhan, MD
  • Physicians are a finite resource we need to protect

    Jack Resneck, Jr., MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Beyond pizza and pens: National Doctors’ Day should be about saving lives

      James Young, MD | Physician
    • Physicians are a finite resource we need to protect

      Jack Resneck, Jr., MD | Physician
    • From clocking in to clocking out: the transition to retirement

      Debbie Moore-Black, RN | Conditions
    • Breaking the cycle of failure in modern medicine

      Kortney West, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Breaking the cycle of failure in modern medicine

      Kortney West, MD | Physician
    • ChatGPT: the Napster of the AI world?

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The missing piece of physicians’ financial plans

      Daniel B. Wrenne, CFP | Finance
    • Counterfeit drugs: a hidden danger lurking in your medicine cabinet

      Emily Kahoud | Meds
    • How understanding cultural backgrounds can lead to better patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From license to loneliness: the dilemma of retired physicians

      Richard Plotzker, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Is Surgery Riskier After a COVID Infection?
  • The Best Medicine for Healthcare Workers: A Living Wage
  • Meat Consumption and UTIs; Air Pollution's Effects on Health
  • 'Early Birds' With Sleep Apnea May Get More CPAP Benefits
  • Mental Health Care Goes Beyond Just the Patient

Meeting Coverage

  • VTE Risk in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Increases With More Lines of Chemotherapy
  • Obesity's Impact on Uterine Cancer Risk Greater in Younger Age Groups
  • Oral Roflumilast Effective in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis
  • Phase III Trials 'Hit a Home Run' in Advanced Endometrial Cancer
  • Cannabis Use Common in Post-Surgery Patients on Opioid Tapering
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Beyond pizza and pens: National Doctors’ Day should be about saving lives

      James Young, MD | Physician
    • Physicians are a finite resource we need to protect

      Jack Resneck, Jr., MD | Physician
    • From clocking in to clocking out: the transition to retirement

      Debbie Moore-Black, RN | Conditions
    • Breaking the cycle of failure in modern medicine

      Kortney West, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Breaking the cycle of failure in modern medicine

      Kortney West, MD | Physician
    • ChatGPT: the Napster of the AI world?

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The missing piece of physicians’ financial plans

      Daniel B. Wrenne, CFP | Finance
    • Counterfeit drugs: a hidden danger lurking in your medicine cabinet

      Emily Kahoud | Meds
    • How understanding cultural backgrounds can lead to better patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From license to loneliness: the dilemma of retired physicians

      Richard Plotzker, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...