Many people assume that there is a tradeoff between making money and making an impact—that you can’t do both at the same time, or at least not to a high level. This has been the prevailing thinking, especially in the business sector.
But over the past few decades, a new field of “social entrepreneurship” has proven this assumption wrong. A spectrum of possibilities now exists for people aspiring to reap profits and impact at the same time.
What is social entrepreneurship?
Social entrepreneurship is a blanket term encompassing a diversity of organizations, activities, approaches, and intentions. As such, the term often eludes a precise definition.
Generally speaking, social entrepreneurship can be defined as the use of business approaches to solve social problems. Rather than separate commercial processes and social missions, social entrepreneurs combine these two aims into one entity.
Social innovation can manifest in myriad ways along a spectrum, as depicted below:
On one end, a traditional business aims solely to achieve maximum profits or “financial value.” On the other end, a traditional charity seeks to maximize impact or “social value.” Social innovation can exist to an extent, even within these two extremes. However, the key differentiator between a traditional business and a social enterprise is that the latter have an impact as an explicit and central reason for their existence. While many social enterprises generate profits, wealth creation is a means to the ultimate end of creating social value.
More distinctive social enterprises exist in the middle of the spectrum. For example, nonprofits have engaged in income generation while for-profits have created a double or triple bottom line, accounting for social and/or environmental impact along with profits. Many social enterprises are unique “hybrid” entities that combine profit and impact in innovative ways.
Given its varied scope, social entrepreneurship is best understood through real-life examples.
One early example of a social enterprise is Newman’s Own. Founded by actor Paul Newman in 1982, Newman’s Own generates income by selling food products like salad dressing, cookies, and frozen pizza. Instead of pocketing this wealth, 100 percent of profits are donated to charities benefiting children. As Paul Newman himself put it, Newman’s Own engages in “shameless exploitation in pursuit of the common good.” Since their founding, they have donated $570 million using this approach.
A more recently established enterprise is Toms shoes. Toms was a famous proponent of the “one-for-one” model: for every pair of shoes they sold, another would be donated. Toms saw significant early success, largely off their socially-oriented mission, but ultimately faced criticism for not achieving the positive impact they promised. Toms has since switched to donating a third of their profits, though other companies like Warby Parker and Bombas continue using the one-for-one approach.
The above examples are U.S.-based enterprises. But social entrepreneurs operate around the world, solving every problem imaginable.
Proximity Designs in Myanmar designs affordable irrigation systems that increase crop yields and expand opportunities for farmers. Ola Filter sells innovative and affordable filters to increase clean water access for Guatemalans. Uganics is a Ugandan enterprise making affordable soap that acts as mosquito repellant to prevent malaria.
In light of the growing climate crisis, there has been an increasing number of social enterprises targeting environmental impact. Twelve recycles atmospheric carbon to make products ranging from sunglasses, car parts, and laundry detergent. Bowery is innovating new vertical indoor farms that enable sustainable food production in urban areas. Fairphone makes smartphones using responsibly-mined materials.
Social entrepreneurship versus charity
Philanthropy is a powerful tool necessary to create global change.
But charity is not the long-term solution to global development, nor can it be the only means to create global change. As Muhammad Yunus once wrote: “Charity is no solution to poverty. Charity only perpetuates poverty by taking the initiative away from the poor. ”
While perhaps too harsh overall, Yunus correctly asserts that sustainable global development requires more than just handing things out to people. Social entrepreneurship is, in many cases, a mechanism of empowerment, giving people the skills or tools they need to uplift themselves.
Everyone can and should continue to donate to effective charities as much as possible. But in the quest to promote global development, lift people out of poverty, and solve social problems, more sustainable approaches are needed for the long term. Social entrepreneurship can be one effective approach in this regard.
What you can do
The especially excited and entrepreneurially-inclined reader can start a social enterprise themselves. Online resources are abundant, with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce offering a quick start guide here. More comprehensive books are also available, with Ann Mei Chang’s Lean Impact as a notable example that uses the Silicon Valley-approved “Lean Startup” method applied to social impact.
However, you don’t have to create a new enterprise to support social entrepreneurs. Anyone can support social entrepreneurship by changing everyday purchasing habits. Pay attention when you are shopping.
One easy way to find socially impactful businesses is by checking for B Corp certification. Companies can get certified as a B Corp by demonstrating “high social and environmental performance,” making a “legal commitment … to be accountable to all stakeholders,” and “exhibiting transparency” by having their performance publicly tracked. Some notable B Corps include Ben & Jerry’s, Patagonia, and Athleta, but a full database of certified B Corps can be found here.
Finally, impact investing has emerged as a way for individuals to financially support socially-oriented companies while also growing their portfolios. One option is to buy stock from publicly traded B Corps, such as AllBirds or Warby Parker. Another method is to invest in a pre-selected basket of socially-conscious companies via an ESG fund or ETF. More information about impact investing can be found in another article, “Purpose & Profit: Impact Investing for Doctors.”
Recha Bergstrom is a women’s imaging radiologist. She is founder and CEO, The Physician Philanthropist, helping doctors learn how to donate effectively and invest responsibly so they can maximize their positive impact on the world, and can be reached on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. Join the private Facebook group, The Physician Philanthropist Group.
Spencer Kelly is an intern.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com