Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Comparing charity evaluation websites: What do those ratings mean?

Recha Bergstrom, MD
Physician
August 10, 2022
Share
Tweet
Share

The majority of people who donate money don’t research or compare charitable organizations. Only 1 in 3 research before giving, according to one of the biggest charity ratings websites, Charity Navigator. Giving 2.0 author Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen says only about three percent compare charitable organizations.

These numbers were both surprising and not surprising to me. I have done most of my donating with no more than a cursory search before hitting that donate button. In contrast, I recently bought a handheld vacuum and spent several days researching it—comparing brands, watching videos, and reading tons of reviews. I don’t think I’m alone in this.

People who do research before they donate commonly turn to charity evaluation websites. These can have incredibly helpful information, but they also have significant limitations, particularly if you don’t understand what they are actually evaluating.

One of the questions I often get about evaluating charities is how to ensure organizations are not wasteful with their money or spending too much on overhead and salaries. I believe that question is top of mind for many because of the way organizations are often measured on charity evaluation websites, where easily available and reportable information (about finances) have evolved into a proxy for effectiveness. Evaluating actual impact is much more complicated.

According to Charity Navigator:

At the extremes, the overhead ratio can offer insight: It can be a valid data point for rooting out fraud and poor financial management. In most cases, however, focusing on overhead without considering other critical dimensions of a charity’s financial and organizational performance does more damage than good. Relying solely on expense ratios when making decisions is not an accurate way to measure charity performance and effectiveness.

I believe that while we certainly do not want our donated dollars to go to waste, overhead and salaries are not the most important indicators for evaluating an organization.

More important would be these considerations: What is their mission, and how do they expect to accomplish it? Who are they serving, and who is driving the action? What are the measurements they use to show progress toward their goals? What kind of impact are they making?

Here I list a few of the most important and commonly used charity evaluation websites, with an explanation of what they are measuring, how they are helpful, and what you should be aware of when looking at their ratings.

  1. Givewell.org
  2. Charity Navigator
  3. Guidestar

For a more complete guide, including evaluations of international organizations and advocacy groups (501c4), you can download my PDF with a full comparison, including Charity Watch, Giving Compass, Impact Matters, Give.org, Great Nonprofits, and CAF.

Givewell.org

This website might be lesser known, but I believe it’s one of the best examples of evidence-based giving and evaluating. Their data-driven evaluations are rigorous, often with the benefit of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which physicians can appreciate as an important factor when assessing the effects of a certain intervention.

Givewell.org is aligned with the Effective Altruism movement, which identifies the most cost-effective organizations addressing health and other problems among vulnerable populations. Aside from their data and evidence-based rigor, I also particularly appreciate their cultural awareness and sensitivity, their straightforward recommendations about the ability to absorb more funding, and transparency with their mistakes. (We all make them—they actually have a tab on their website, Our Mistakes, to show theirs, which everyone can learn from.) To me, that is true transparency.

They make specific recommendations for a very small number of organizations, currently a total of 9 Top Charities, that give you the most impact per donated dollar. These are organizations that work in global health and development, as a dollar can go much farther overseas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Charity Navigator

This is one of the most well-known and commonly used charity evaluation websites. It does have useful information, but their rating system can be misleading if you don’t know what information it’s giving you.

Charity Navigator’s ratings focus on financial health, accountability, and transparency and are based primarily on information provided on an organization’s Form 990 (this is the form a nonprofit has to file with the IRS) and website. Organizations are not evaluated by this website on their impact or effectiveness. As mentioned above and even pointed out on their website: “Relying solely on expense ratios when making decisions is not an accurate way to measure charity performance and effectiveness.”

Important points to know about Charity Navigator:

  • Provides data on more than 1.6 million nonprofits in the U.S.
  • Rates only organizations registered as 501(c)(3)
  • It rates more than 160,000 U.S.-based nonprofits. The ones it rates are big—those that have revenues over $1 million for two consecutive years and have been in existence for at least seven years.

Guidestar.org

Guidestar is an even more comprehensive database, aggregating information about the 2+ million nonprofits registered as 501(c)(3) organizations in the United States. In addition to publishing their Form 990 tax returns, it categorizes organizations into levels from bronze to platinum on the basis of the amount of information they self-report.

Self-reported information on this site digs deeper and can better understand the organization’s mission, goals, strategies, metrics, capabilities, and impact. This platform is geared toward people within the philanthropy sector and is often the go-to platform for foundations to check nonprofits. So for anyone with a nonprofit or considering starting one, it’s an important database to be on.

When trying to make an impact in a complex system, evaluating and rating is also complex. There are many ways to approach and learn about charitable organizations.

Recha Bergstrom is a women’s imaging radiologist. She is founder and CEO, The Physician Philanthropist, helping doctors learn how to donate effectively and invest responsibly so they can maximize their positive impact on the world, and can be reached on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. Join the private Facebook group, The Physician Philanthropist Group.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Why you should add advance directives to your college freshman's college checklist

August 10, 2022 Kevin 1
…
Next

Boundaries for women physicians

August 10, 2022 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Why you should add advance directives to your college freshman's college checklist
Next Post >
Boundaries for women physicians

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Recha Bergstrom, MD

  • The power of togetherness: Finding connection and friendship in giving circles to increase your impact

    Recha Bergstrom, MD
  • Invest in your child. Invest in their future: ESG funds and 529 plans

    Recha Bergstrom, MD
  • How you can donate effectively after tragedy

    Recha Bergstrom, MD

Related Posts

  • A physician’s addiction to social media

    Amanda Xi, MD
  • How a physician keynote can highlight your conference

    Kevin Pho, MD
  • Chasing numbers contributes to physician burnout

    DrizzleMD
  • Many medical marijuana program websites are silent about possible risks

    Erik Messamore, MD, PhD
  • Instead of comparing, let’s nurture the next generation of physicians

    Anonymous
  • The black physician’s burden

    Naomi Tweyo Nkinsi

More in Physician

  • How relationships predict physician burnout risk

    Tomi Mitchell, MD
  • Preserving your sense of self as a doctor

    Camille C. Imbo, MD
  • The geometry of communication in medicine

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • Why I became a pediatrician: a doctor’s story

    Jamie S. Hutton, MD
  • Is trauma surgery a dying field?

    Farshad Farnejad, MD
  • Why we fund unproven autism therapies

    Ronald L. Lindsay, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Direct primary care in low-income markets

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Female athlete urine leakage: A urologist explains

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • AI in medical imaging: When algorithms block the view

      Gerald Kuo | Tech
    • Are you neurodivergent or just bored?

      Martha Rosenberg | Meds
    • The danger of dismantling DEI in medicine

      Jacquelyne Gaddy, MD | Physician
    • Why the 4 a.m. wake-up call isn’t for everyone

      Laura Suttin, MD, MBA | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The flaw in the ACA’s physician ownership ban

      Luis Tumialán, MD | Policy
    • Systematic neglect of mental health

      Ronke Lawal | Tech
    • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Transforming patient fear into understanding through clear communication [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How movement improves pelvic floor function

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How immigrant physicians solved a U.S. crisis

      Eram Alam, PhD | Conditions
    • Pediatric leadership silence on FDA ADHD recall

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Conditions
    • How relationships predict physician burnout risk

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • The ethical conflict of the Charlie Gard case

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Direct primary care in low-income markets

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Female athlete urine leakage: A urologist explains

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • AI in medical imaging: When algorithms block the view

      Gerald Kuo | Tech
    • Are you neurodivergent or just bored?

      Martha Rosenberg | Meds
    • The danger of dismantling DEI in medicine

      Jacquelyne Gaddy, MD | Physician
    • Why the 4 a.m. wake-up call isn’t for everyone

      Laura Suttin, MD, MBA | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The flaw in the ACA’s physician ownership ban

      Luis Tumialán, MD | Policy
    • Systematic neglect of mental health

      Ronke Lawal | Tech
    • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Transforming patient fear into understanding through clear communication [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How movement improves pelvic floor function

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How immigrant physicians solved a U.S. crisis

      Eram Alam, PhD | Conditions
    • Pediatric leadership silence on FDA ADHD recall

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Conditions
    • How relationships predict physician burnout risk

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • The ethical conflict of the Charlie Gard case

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Comparing charity evaluation websites: What do those ratings mean?
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...