Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why electronic medical records should be standardized

Fred N. Pelzman, MD
Physician
October 22, 2019
187 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

How can we possibly get to standardization in medicine? And is that a good thing?

Standardized checklists save lives; rigid procedures for sterilization of equipment saves lives; universal compliance with recommended beneficial treatments saves lives. And while it’s sometimes a wonderful thing to let a surgeon solve a problem creatively or to allow a patient visit to go overtime in order to let the full story come out, for many other things, standardization is worth achieving.

As our massive institution moves towards a unified electronic medical record (EMR), there has been a well-meaning effort to standardize how we do things across every part, in every clinical setting. As you can imagine, this raises a lot of issues, creates a lot of resistance among those being asked to change their behaviors and how they interact with the EMR, and often an enormous amount of frustration. It is clear that as multiple voices have given input into how the “new” electronic medical record is built, and how we use it in so many different ways, that we’ve ended up with a mishmash of systems that far more often get in the way of caring for patients than really doing what we think it needs to do.

The “superuser” and the “piler on”

Take something as simple as documenting an office visit in the outpatient setting for the ongoing care of a couple of chronic medical conditions or an acute complaint. We’ve seen at our practice, as well as other sites, that people use the functionality of the electronic medical record with widely varying degrees of skill.

We see “super users” who engage every bell and whistle, every macro and doodad, clicking every box and invoking every smart phrase and fast-track templated solution. There are those that we call the “pilers on,” those who simply take the last office visit note and add on the update, what’s happened since they’ve been seen last, what’s happening today. And there are those who do the bare minimum, clicking just the boxes that need to be clicked, and getting on with things. Finally, there are those who use the EMR only as a word processor, opening up one text field and typing away their entire SOAP note, and then calling it a day.

Wait — there’s one more type, those who still hand-write their notes on old lined pieces of hospital chart paper, and then scan that into the system.

I’m not going to speak to which one of these styles is best, and I don’t think we’ll ever be able to teach all the old dogs to do all the new tricks in all the same way. But the whole point of an electronic medical record is to make our lives easier, to communicate our thoughts in the moment of taking care of our patients, and leave a record that helps make sure the next person taking up the care of that patient knows what came before.

The questionnaire conundrum

We have been working on a process to standardize many of the screening questionnaires that are asked across our institution, whether screening for domestic violence, substance use disorders, depression, or suicidality. Large workgroups with multiple stakeholders have put in countless hours trying to figure out the best way, the best questions to ask, the best way to present this to help our patients answer these things in a safe and private environment, to help us give them the care they need. We have been working closely with the development team of the electronic medical record, and we are getting close. But just recently, I discovered that the same questions, these same questionnaires, are not going to be the ones that will be used when our patients are seen in psychiatry.

Pain scores are another example. For years at our practice, we’ve included pain scores in the vitals that our medical technicians take when they bring the patients into the room at the start of a visit. Their blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, height, and weight. And then they hear that ubiquitous question, “Are you having any pain?”

Since pain was added as the fifth vital sign many years ago (which, some people argue, may have contributed to the development and furtherance of the opioid crisis as doctors and other providers were encouraged to drive pain scores ever closer to zero), it has been a Joint Commission requirement and a “hard stop” within our electronic medical record. You cannot finish a visit, cannot close an encounter, cannot send out a bill for the care you provided, until a pain score has been noted in the chart. So even if a patient is just there for a blood pressure check, or to go over their labs, or to have us perform any one of a myriad of medical care that really don’t need to know whether they’re in pain, we need to put some number in the system.

Leaving aside whether this has created a lot of mythical pain-free patients, I just recently discovered that they don’t have to document pain scores at our pain management clinic.

Too many cooks in the broth

Things like this have developed from having multiple different cooks spoiling the broth, too many people coming at the healthcare system with their varied agendas, their bureaucratic requirements, their efforts to do quality improvement or performance enhancement. When an insurance company tells providers that they need to show them how often they do X or Y, somewhere someone gets excited about this and adds it into the system so that we need to report on X or Y without fail, in order to get a good report sent off to those who asked for it.

Collecting accurate data, and creating effective functioning charts for patients, are noble goals we should all aspire to. We hope that the opportunities are there as electronic medical records continue to develop for the voices of those taking care of patients to be heard more clearly as we cry out for help. Data can be amazing and can help us determine whether we are missing certain healthcare opportunities for our patients, and it can lead to efforts to address and remove healthcare disparities.

But if we do it one way at one practice, and another way somewhere else, then we’re never going to be able to compare these apples and oranges. As systems get more and more sophisticated, and we begin to be able to mine data directly from the text we write about our patients, then the ways we record this information needs to become standardized, and ultimately will become more relevant and useful. So if you’ve got pain in the emergency department, then you should have pain here in my practice, and you should have pain in cardiology. If we’re required to reconcile your medications list at every office visit in adult internal medicine and pediatrics practices, then surely we should have to do the same in neurology, urology, and surgery.

I can only hope that the electronic medical record that we build across our vast institution is not only kinder and gentler, but more intelligent, more streamlined, and more standardized, making the lives of our patients and all of our providers go more smoothly.

If not, then there’s lots more pain to come.

Fred N. Pelzman is an internal medicine physician who blogs at MedPage Today’s Building the Patient-Centered Medical Home.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Why this physician never tells anyone she's a doctor

October 22, 2019 Kevin 32
…
Next

Crossing the threshold when residency begins

October 22, 2019 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Health IT

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Why this physician never tells anyone she's a doctor
Next Post >
Crossing the threshold when residency begins

More by Fred N. Pelzman, MD

  • Can answers to after hours calls be automated?

    Fred N. Pelzman, MD
  • We have to do better than DNR tattoos

    Fred N. Pelzman, MD
  • 20 minutes isn’t long enough for an office visit

    Fred N. Pelzman, MD

Related Posts

  • Digital advances in the medical aid in dying movement

    Jennifer Lynn
  • How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for social media training in medical education 

    Oscar Chen, Sera Choi, and Clara Seong
  • A medical student’s physician inspiration

    Uju Momah
  • Why this physician teaches first-year medical students 

    Mark Kelley, MD
  • Why a gap year will make this medical student a better physician

    Yoo Jung Kim, MD
  • Many questions remain about medical marijuana

    Steven Reznick, MD

More in Physician

  • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

    Alexandra Kharazi, MD
  • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD
  • The dark side of medicine: an urgent call to action against greed

    Don Gaede, MD
  • Dr. Glaucomflecken for president!

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Amy Bissada, DO & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD
  • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

    Edward T. Creagan, MD
  • Do residents deserve the title of physician?

    Anonymous
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds
    • How this doctor found her passion in ballroom dancing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Surviving and thriving after life’s most difficult moments

      Rebecca Fogg, MBA | Conditions
    • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 7 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Make the Diagnosis: This Bump on His Nose is a Tricky Diagnosis
  • CRT Regimen Boosts Complete Response Rate in Unresectable Vulvar Cancer
  • Fla. Doc Charged With Murder; McConnell Exits Rehab Facility; BPA on Store Receipts
  • FDA Faults Next-Gen Olympus Duodenoscopes
  • CDK4/6 Inhibition Active in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Meeting Coverage

  • CRT Regimen Boosts Complete Response Rate in Unresectable Vulvar Cancer
  • CDK4/6 Inhibition Active in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
  • Switch to IL-23 Blocker Yields Deep Responses in Recalcitrant Plaque Psoriasis
  • Biomarkers of Response With Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Cancer
  • At-Home Topical Therapy for Molluscum Contagiosum Gets High Marks
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds
    • How this doctor found her passion in ballroom dancing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Surviving and thriving after life’s most difficult moments

      Rebecca Fogg, MBA | Conditions
    • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Why electronic medical records should be standardized
7 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...