Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Shared medical decision making is a not a new concept

Stephen Devries, MD
Physician
April 26, 2017
26 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

Decisions regarding medical care are often not very straightforward due to the uncertainties, risks, and limited options involved. But, above and beyond the actual choices to be considered, the process of how the choices are made has become a red-hot topic. And the value of the patient — as opposed to the doctor — as the driver of medical decision is, quite curiously, just beginning to be recognized in a model called shared decision making.

Shared decision making is the process between a health care professional and patient to help the patient decide between several medically reasonable choices based on the patient’s preference and values. It is startling to consider the idea that shared decision making is presented as a new model, since the basic tenet of the patient as being in charge appears to be self-evident. But sadly, there is indeed a need to spotlight this “new” idea — precisely because it has, heretofore, been too often missing in action.

An interesting question to ask relates to timing. Why is shared decision just now attracting so much attention? The reason is not so high-minded. Spoiler alert: non-nutritive greenery is involved.

Studies show that more informed patients tend to cost less. A fascinating observation is that the more patients are informed about various treatment options, the more likely they are to opt for the conservative approach and avoid expensive procedures and surgeries. Giving people more information saves money. Cost savings is not the most noble reason to encourage shared decision making — but it’s likely the side-benefit that’s needed to give it the attention it deserves.

No area of medicine is more ripe for shared decision making than my specialty: cardiology. A cardiac procedure of particular interest for medical decision making is angioplasty. Angioplasty involves threading a catheter into the heart, where a balloon is inflated to open a narrowed coronary artery. Although intuition might suggest that angioplasty would improve the outlook for patients with chronically constricted arteries, surprisingly, this has not been proven to be true.

A landmark medical trial published ten years ago studied patients with coronary blockages: All were treated with medication according to guidelines, but half were randomized to initial treatment with angioplasty. At follow-up that averaged about five years, angioplasty failed to show an improvement in survival or reduction of heart attacks. The study was named according to the clever acronym COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and AGgressive Drug Evaluation).

But as it turned out, the only ones who needed courage were the physicians, as the patients apparently already had plenty. In a study that analyzed 59 recorded conversations of cardiologists discussing the decision to undergo an angiogram and possible angioplasty, better-informed patients were more than three times as likely to avoid invasive treatment.

Backtracking for a bit, it might be reasonable to ask, what is the alternative to shared-decision making? Isn’t it obvious that patients need to be fully informed about all of the options, and that their own preferences and values should be integral to the final decision?  You might think so — but historically, you would be wrong.

For instance, in the cardiologist/patient procedure discussion just mentioned, only 3 percent of the conversations analyzed contained all of the key elements deemed essential for informed decision making, and merely 14 percent met even a less stringent set of criteria.

One might argue that it is entirely proper for physicians, advantaged by extensive training, knowledge, and experience, to direct their patients to make the “best” medical decision. In certain situations, especially emergent ones where risks and benefits are more clearly established, and urgency is required, a strong case can be made for physicians to be more directive. But even in those situations, there needs to be an accommodation, if not a full welcoming, of patient values and preferences. This issue arose several times in my medical career, including several instances when patients who were Jehovah’s Witnesses refused blood transfusions in situation where that decision could possibly have resulted in a fatal outcome.

Moreover, the idea of a “best “medical decision assumes, often incorrectly, that there is one. In a 2009 analysis of clinical guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association approved clinical guidelines, only 11 percent of the recommendations were found to be supported by the highest level “A” evidence. Fully 48 percent of the recommendations had their origin in level “C” evidence, nothing more than “expert opinion, case studies, or standard of care.”

The fact that medical science often isn’t sufficiently developed to identify a clear “best” answer — even from a purely objective perspective — is not a fatal flaw, but it is humbling. And most importantly of all, it is the truth. Acknowledging this reality paves the way for a wide open, shared discussion that can be liberating both for the physician and patient. And give both breathing room to add hearty doses of personal values and individual preferences to the mix.

There’s little doubt that greater adoption of shared medical decision will be a major step forward to advance the best medical care of each patient, with the realization that “best” treatment is more an absolute than a relative term.  And although the sudden surge in interest in shared decision making is largely financially motivated — for once, all the interests are aligned in the right direction.

Stephen Devries is executive director, Gaples Institute for Integrative Cardiology.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

The cruel irony of the Hippocratic Oath

April 25, 2017 Kevin 0
…
Next

If she gets pregnant, she might die. Do I help?

April 26, 2017 Kevin 3
…

Tagged as: Cardiology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The cruel irony of the Hippocratic Oath
Next Post >
If she gets pregnant, she might die. Do I help?

More by Stephen Devries, MD

  • How much health can you buy for $14,000?

    Stephen Devries, MD

Related Posts

  • Digital advances in the medical aid in dying movement

    Jennifer Lynn
  • Nobody should ever be forced to make a medical decision on the basis of congressional hearings

    Anonymous
  • How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for social media training in medical education 

    Oscar Chen, Sera Choi, and Clara Seong
  • A medical student’s physician inspiration

    Uju Momah
  • Why this physician teaches first-year medical students 

    Mark Kelley, MD
  • Why a gap year will make this medical student a better physician

    Yoo Jung Kim, MD

More in Physician

  • The Iranian diaspora’s fight for liberty: Overcoming challenges in the largest women’s rights movement of our century

    Montreh Tavakkoli, MD
  • The harmful effects of shaming patients for self-education

    Maryanna Barrett, MD
  • The power of self-appreciation: Why physicians need to start acknowledging their own contributions

    Wendy Schofer, MD
  • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

    Alexandra Kharazi, MD
  • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD
  • The dark side of medicine: an urgent call to action against greed

    Don Gaede, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
    • Safe sex for seniors: Dispelling myths and embracing safe practices [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Safe sex for seniors: Dispelling myths and embracing safe practices [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Overcoming Parkinson’s: a journey of laughter and resilience

      Cynthia Poire Mathews, FNP | Conditions
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • Maximize sleep efficiency with stimulus control

      Pedram Navab, DO | Conditions
    • The Iranian diaspora’s fight for liberty: Overcoming challenges in the largest women’s rights movement of our century

      Montreh Tavakkoli, MD | Physician
    • Surviving clinical rounds: tips and tales from a pediatric hematologist-oncologist [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • How This Doctor Found Purpose After a Devastating Injury
  • House Lawmakers Squabble Over HHS Budget
  • Infant Formula Crisis Exposed FDA and Industry Failings, Lawmakers Say
  • Building Vaccine Trust Among the General Public
  • Is It Business as Usual for the Drug Industry?

Meeting Coverage

  • Phase III Trials 'Hit a Home Run' in Advanced Endometrial Cancer
  • Cannabis Use Common in Post-Surgery Patients on Opioid Tapering
  • Less Abuse With Extended-Release Oxycodone, Poison Center Data Suggest
  • Novel Strategies Show Winning Potential in Ovarian Cancer
  • Children Do Well With Fewer Opiates After Surgery
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
    • Safe sex for seniors: Dispelling myths and embracing safe practices [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Safe sex for seniors: Dispelling myths and embracing safe practices [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Overcoming Parkinson’s: a journey of laughter and resilience

      Cynthia Poire Mathews, FNP | Conditions
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • Maximize sleep efficiency with stimulus control

      Pedram Navab, DO | Conditions
    • The Iranian diaspora’s fight for liberty: Overcoming challenges in the largest women’s rights movement of our century

      Montreh Tavakkoli, MD | Physician
    • Surviving clinical rounds: tips and tales from a pediatric hematologist-oncologist [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Shared medical decision making is a not a new concept
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...