Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Where does science end and where do politics begin? 

John Connolly
Conditions
March 15, 2021
Share
Tweet
Share

In the past 12 months, as the coronavirus swept from coast to coast and back again, scientific knowledge and inquiry have been thrust to the forefront of American political consciousness. With science’s newfound centrality to our public life has come increased respect and admiration for health care professionals and medical researchers. But as science has risen in national importance, so too have its detractors. As we round the one-year mark of COVID-19’s deep imprint on the United States, it is worth considering how threats from all sides of the political spectrum threaten to distort popular scientific knowledge and sow mistrust.

On the one hand, some ignore science altogether – the cranks who downplayed the seriousness of the coronavirus amidst its terrifying dart across the country. These are the science skeptics. They include those who mock masking, those who berate doctors and denigrate microbiologists even as the vaccines they designed offer our best hope for returning completely to pre-pandemic life, and those who peddle snake oils (or, possibly worse, bleach) as miracle COVID-19 cures.

Though immensely frustrating to the medical community, particularly as ending the pandemic depends on our ability to effectively distribute vaccines, these skeptics are at least transparent in their denialism. Moreover, a good scientist can easily refute patently false claims. Consider, for instance, Dr. Paul Offitt, Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who has authored numerous books refuting sham claims such as the idea that vaccines cause autism. Likely, Dr. Offitt’s activism and leadership in promoting vaccine education and awareness have saved the lives of thousands of children.

At the other end of our public discourse is an entirely different group: public figures who have solemnly pledged to “follow the science” but who have used science as a crutch to make fundamentally political decisions. Take the tragic saga of the American Federation of Teachers’ role in opposing school openings nationwide. The AFT’s President, Randi Weingarten, may have pledged her fealty to science. Still, the scientific studies conducted on school re-openings across the world demonstrate that they are hardly transmission hubs for COVID-19. Meanwhile, political foot-dragging has delayed school openings nationwide, likely contributing to the uptick in youth depression, substance abuse, and suicide in the past 12 months.

An examination of the argument against school re-openings reveals that its logic is rooted in a value judgment, not in science. Is it worth it to send teachers back into school under less-than-ideal conditions? Science might tell you that school re-openings pose some risk to teachers. But science also might indicate that a refusal to return to classrooms means that more children will suffer. With scientific evidence supporting either side of the argument, we must rely on subjective judgment.

While scientific knowledge can recommend and inform, the core issue is that it cannot make decisions that are rooted, at a basic level, in what we value. We know that the flu kills thousands of Americans each year, yet no 21st-century flu ever stopped us from crowding into gyms, bars, and concert halls. Why? Because collectively, we made an implicit value judgment – that the risk of contracting the flu was a price worth paying for the comforts of pre-2020 America. In contrast, we recognize that yes, COVID-19 is markedly more lethal than the flu – and as the science is our guide, we have adjusted our behavior accordingly.

As we stagger towards normalcy, we should be mindful of the correct role of science in American life. Science is fundamentally about inquiry, discovery, and knowledge. It is up to us how we choose to apply that knowledge. Instead of scientific denialism, but also instead of citing “science” to justify decisions that fly in the face of empirical evidence, we should allow scientific evidence to inform our decisions and steer our behavior, while humbly acknowledging that values and judgment are our ultimate arbiters.

John Connolly is a medical student.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Reimagining diet: Why cheating brings the win

March 15, 2021 Kevin 0
…
Next

One year into the COVID-19 pandemic

March 15, 2021 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: COVID, Infectious Disease

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Reimagining diet: Why cheating brings the win
Next Post >
One year into the COVID-19 pandemic

ADVERTISEMENT

More by John Connolly

  • Our public health efforts depend on flexibility and trust

    John Connolly

Related Posts

  • Aduhelm and how money and politics supersede science

    Wes Campbell, PhD
  • Take politics out of science and medicine

    Anonymous
  • Can the Maternal CARE Act fail moms? 

    Sonal Patel, MD
  • Our patients matter, but at what cost to our families? 

    James A. Quinn, PA-C
  • Why politics has a place in medicine

    Ariana Witkin, MD
  • How to deal with politics in the workplace

    Health eCareers

More in Conditions

  • Mumps orchitis still causes infertility years after childhood

    Oluyemisi Famuyiwa, MD
  • Extreme weight cutting harms health and resilience in youth wrestling

    Sarah White, APRN
  • Institutional reporting systems discourage clinical honesty

    Jenny Shields, PhD
  • How doctors can turn criticism into collaboration

    Mary Remón, LCPC
  • Nurse-initiated protocols for sepsis: a strategic imperative for patient care and hospital operations

    Rhonda Collins, DNP, RN
  • How molecular discoveries are transforming preeclampsia prediction and care

    Thomas McElrath, MD, PhD and Kara Rood, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why rigorous training is vital for today’s surgeons

      Philip Alford, MD | Physician
    • How AI, animals, and ecosystems reveal a new kind of intelligence

      Fateh Entabi, MD | Tech
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • How to break the cycle of judgment in medicine [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden cost of professionalism in medical training

      Hannah Wulk | Education
    • Meeting transgender patients where they are: a health care imperative

      Tyler B. Evans, MD, MPH | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How photos shape drug stigma—and what we can do about it

      Jeffrey Hom, MD, MPH, MSHP | Physician
    • From participants to partners: Rethinking clinical trial design

      Robert Den, MD | Physician
    • Mumps orchitis still causes infertility years after childhood

      Oluyemisi Famuyiwa, MD | Conditions
    • What it means to be a woman in medicine today

      Annie M. Trumbull | Education
    • First-name familiarity improves doctor-patient connection

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • How Japan and the U.S. can collaborate for better health care

      Vikram Madireddy, MD, Masashi Hamada, MD, PhD, and Hibiki Yamazaki | Education

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why rigorous training is vital for today’s surgeons

      Philip Alford, MD | Physician
    • How AI, animals, and ecosystems reveal a new kind of intelligence

      Fateh Entabi, MD | Tech
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • How to break the cycle of judgment in medicine [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden cost of professionalism in medical training

      Hannah Wulk | Education
    • Meeting transgender patients where they are: a health care imperative

      Tyler B. Evans, MD, MPH | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How photos shape drug stigma—and what we can do about it

      Jeffrey Hom, MD, MPH, MSHP | Physician
    • From participants to partners: Rethinking clinical trial design

      Robert Den, MD | Physician
    • Mumps orchitis still causes infertility years after childhood

      Oluyemisi Famuyiwa, MD | Conditions
    • What it means to be a woman in medicine today

      Annie M. Trumbull | Education
    • First-name familiarity improves doctor-patient connection

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • How Japan and the U.S. can collaborate for better health care

      Vikram Madireddy, MD, Masashi Hamada, MD, PhD, and Hibiki Yamazaki | Education

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...