Have you ever read what your physicians and nurses have written in your medical chart? If not, would you want to?
The OpenNotes project is a recently launched observational research study that involves 100 primary care doctors and about 25,000 patients. Lead author Dr. Tom Delbacoa, a primary care physician at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, poses the research question succinctly: “After a year, will the patients and doctors still want to continue sharing notes?”
In the study, patients are connected to their doctors via email and invited to view their doctors’ notes after each visit and again before the subsequent visit.
These patients are registered portal users and already take advantage of Internet access to their lab test results that their physicians make available online. What is new is this: For the first time, these patients will have access to their chart notes online. They will be able to read what their physicians have recorded, such as their physicians’
- findings on physical examination
- interpretation of such findings
- conclusions about a patient’s current condition
- thoughts about future evaluation of the patient’s condition
- prognosis for the patient
Why do we need it?
If you are wondering why we need the study, here is a two-word answer: informational technology.
The advent of informational technology (IT) has changed the face of 21st Century medicine in dramatic ways. Electronic medical records are changing how clinicians record, retrieve and exchange medical information about patients. And online resource centers and support services are changing how patients learn about their disease(s) and treatment(s).
On the legal front, the 1996 passage of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) assured patients the right (1) to review their medical records and (2) request corrections and additions be made to the record. Since then, the medical chart has no longer been the sole purview of clinicians. Yet relatively few patients take advantage of their right, either because they don’t want to or because they are blocked by obstacles when they do want to.
Great controversy persists on both sides of the stethoscope regarding the consequences — positive and negative — for patients.
IT is not going away. We need to understand the potential benefits and risks of open notes. The observational study described in my last post is a start.
My reaction is not unique among primary care physicians (PCPs). For those of us who do not welcome this development, what are we worried about?
Remembering how time-crunched I was when I was in practice, and seeing how much busier today’s clinicians are, my concerns that are shared with some other PCPs include:
- Patients may call, email or write letters, wanting clarification.
- Patients may call, email or write letters, wanting to discuss or correct what clinicians consider insignificant details.
- Patients may misunderstand what is written and then draw inaccurate conclusions about their condition, which could lead to fear, guilt, anger, depression, confusion, frustration or hopelessness.
- Patients may misunderstand a term or abbreviation and feel angry at a perceived insult.
- Patients may learn upsetting news on their own, without the benefit of their physician or nurse to offer a healing context to help patients absorb and process the news.
- Clinicians may refrain from recording useful information for fear of misinterpretation by patients.
The purpose of the medical chart
When I was in practice, I used to tease my colleagues, “I want my patients’ charts to be so well-organized and thorough that if were struck down by lightning, you could easily take over their care, knowing exactly what I was thinking and planning.”
In my mind, the chief purposes of my medical charts — and it’s no accident I’ve always referred to them as “my” charts — were (2) to help me provide efficient and high quality care by summarizing and organizing the data and (2) to help others take over should I be unavailable.
In addition to recording the medical history and the findings of my physical examination of the patient, I recorded my differential diagnosis (the list of diagnoses I was considering), my impressions of the most likely diagnosis, my plans for evaluation and my prescriptions and instructions for the patient. Sometimes I even recorded my “Plan B,” in case the current treatment was ineffective.
The intense grief I felt over closing my medical practice permanently when my cancer recurred the first time in 1992 was softened just a bit when colleagues told me how easy my charts made it for them to take over the care of my patients.
The medical chart has other purposes, such as providing:
- legal documentation of what was — and wasn’t — done or said at a patient visit
- documentation for insurers’ determination of payment (or non-payment)
- quality monitors
Healthy Survivors want their medical charts to help them get good care and/or live as fully as possible.
The potential benefits of OpenNotes
For years, consumer advocates and some leaders in healthcare policy wanted to change how clinicians and the public viewed the medical chart. “[T]he Institutes of Medicine urged society to view the note not as an artifact, but as a living interactive document shared between patients and providers.”
Why did they work so hard for this change?
Because the potential benefits are huge.
Despite my initial negative reaction to the idea of patients being able to read their own chart, I can see the potential benefits. By enabling patients to read and amend their chart, we open opportunities to:
- pick up serious inaccuracies and avoid medical errors
- facilitate sharing of notes with other consultants
- reinforce the clinician’s findings and recommendations discussed at a visit
- clarify something the clinician said or did at the visit
- improve patients’ insight into clinicians’ decision-making
- gradually accept and adjust to some diagnoses
- motivate patient to comply with prescribed behavioral modifications
- help patient prepare for office visits
- dispel unfounded worries about what clinicians were finding or thinking
- involve family and other caregivers in the patient’s care
Advocates believe that when open notes become the standard of care, clinicians and patients will enjoy improved efficiency, communication and satisfaction.
[Editor’s note: Stay tuned for part 2 of Dr. Harpham’s take on OpenNotes, coming soon]
Wendy S. Harpham is an internal medicine physician who blogs at Dr. Wendy Harpham on Health Survivorship and is the author of Only 10 Seconds to Care: Help and Hope for Busy Clinicians.
Submit a guest post and be heard.