Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Better guidelines that consider breast density are critical for women’s health

Veronica Irvin, PhD, MPH
Conditions
November 11, 2022
9 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

October 27th is the 30th anniversary of the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA). Congress enacted this law to safeguard nationwide access to quality mammography to detect breast cancer in its earliest, most treatable stages. With this Act, the federal government accredits, inspects, and certifies mammography facilities and standardizes mammography equipment, quality assurance, recordkeeping, and communication of results.

What’s missing from the MQSA is standardized language to inform women and providers if women have dense breast tissue – especially when considering that breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer almost half of all women have dense breasts.

Mammography machines may miss breast cancers for women with dense breasts and can have more false negatives (resulting in women being told they don’t have cancer when they do). Dense breasts can mask the tumors and make them more difficult for machines to detect.

Women need to know if they should discuss additional testing due to their breast density. Women with dense breasts may want additional screening such as MRI, ultrasound, or digital breast tomosynthesis. These tests can be more sensitive and might detect breast cancer that would remain hidden using traditional mammography.

However, the current federal guidelines do not require that women and providers are notified if she has dense breasts. Currently, 38 States and Washington D.C. require some level of notification to either the woman, provider, or both. But the details of what is communicated vary between states. State reporting requirements range from information about breast density in general to specific information on a patient’s breast density level and risk factors.

To be sure, providing women with more information about dense breasts may increase their worry about getting breast cancer. But more important than worrying is sharing information that motivates women to reach out to their health providers for additional screening.

It is true that the FDA has proposed a rule that would amend the mammography standard reporting requirements to require the provider’s written report of the results include information about the breast density of patients. But this amendment was put on the table in 2019, and there are no official changes to date.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concluded in 2016 that the current science was insufficient to recommend additional screening for breast cancer using breast ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, DBT, or other methods in women identified to have dense breasts on an otherwise negative screening mammogram.

The USPSTF recommendations matter as they are considered definitive standards for preventive services. If the USPSTF is recognized by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, preventive services with a grade of A or B must be covered without cost-sharing (e.g., copayment or deductible) under new health insurance plans or policies. However, the USPSTF recommendations on screening for breast cancer are currently being updated.

Women can find out where their state stands on communication about breast density information at densebreast-info.org. We can also take longer-term actions by reaching out to elected officials. Ask Senators and Congressional Representatives to expand the Mammography Quality Standards Act to require standardized communication about breast density information to women and health providers. Women who are advocates for breast health and the health expert community can also provide public commentary on the upcoming U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. 

Better guidelines that consider breast density when screening for breast cancer are critical for women’s health. The sooner a woman knows she has cancer, the sooner she can be treated. Earlier treatment saves lives.

Veronica Irvin is an epidemiologist.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

How to swallow a pill

November 11, 2022 Kevin 0
…
Next

Dementia peels back the layers of our lives

November 11, 2022 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN, Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
How to swallow a pill
Next Post >
Dementia peels back the layers of our lives

Related Posts

  • The health effects of structural racism

    Niran S. Al-Agba, MD
  • When breast cancer screening guidelines conflict: Some patients face real consequences

    Leda Dederich
  • Are negative news cycles and social media injurious to our health?

    Rabia Jalal, MD
  • Protecting Black women’s maternal health is urgent

    Cessilye R. Smith
  • The pandemic exposes critical gaps in Canada’s health workforce planning

    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, PhD
  • How social media can help or hurt your health care career

    Health eCareers

More in Conditions

  • The endless waves of chronic illness

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • Surviving and thriving after life’s most difficult moments

    Rebecca Fogg, MBA
  • The surprising power of Play-Doh in pediatric care: How it’s bringing families together

    Alexander Rakowsky, MD
  • Lazarus: the dead man brought back to life

    William Lynes, MD
  • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

    Greg Smith, MD
  • 5 essential tips to help men prevent prostate cancer

    Kevin Jones, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • The Titanic sinking: a metaphor for the impending collapse of medicine

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD & Shreekant Vasudhev, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Surviving clinical rounds: tips and tales from a pediatric hematologist-oncologist [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The harmful effects of shaming patients for self-education

      Maryanna Barrett, MD | Physician
    • The power of self-appreciation: Why physicians need to start acknowledging their own contributions

      Wendy Schofer, MD | Physician
    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Abortion Is Not Murder in the Eyes of the Law
  • Introducing Allergenic Foods Early Tied to a Reduction in Later Allergies
  • Isotretinoin REMS Still Needed, But Its Burden Could Be Reduced, FDA Staff Says
  • Children Do Well With Fewer Opiates After Surgery
  • High Out-of-Pocket Costs Tied to Less Follow-Up After Initial Mammography

Meeting Coverage

  • Children Do Well With Fewer Opiates After Surgery
  • Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions
  • Orismilast Clears Skin in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis
  • New Combinations Promising in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
  • No Survival Benefit With CRT Versus Chemo for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • The Titanic sinking: a metaphor for the impending collapse of medicine

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD & Shreekant Vasudhev, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Surviving clinical rounds: tips and tales from a pediatric hematologist-oncologist [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The harmful effects of shaming patients for self-education

      Maryanna Barrett, MD | Physician
    • The power of self-appreciation: Why physicians need to start acknowledging their own contributions

      Wendy Schofer, MD | Physician
    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Better guidelines that consider breast density are critical for women’s health
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...