Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Abortion debates need to happen, but both sides need some ground rules

Michael McCutchen, MD, MBA
Policy
July 15, 2022
28 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 to uphold Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act and 5–4 to overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The political temperature was already heightened because Politico released a leaked draft opinion on May 2, 2022.

The pending ruling threw the United States into an emotional pressure cooker spurred on by heavy (some would say irresponsible) news coverage and social media fervor that burned with the heat of a thousand suns. Roe v. Wade was considered by many as settled law, and this ruling has put many in the pro-choice camp into a heightened state of anger and unease. Conversely, advocates against abortion saw this as a victory 49 years in the making. The Supreme Court, whether you agree or not, has decided the right to abortion is neither codified nor implied nor outlawed in the Constitution of the United States of America. The choice to illegalize abortion and to what measure has now been relegated back to the states and their elected representatives.

As a result of this ruling, the topic of abortion is at the forefront of the minds of legislators, medical professionals, patients, friends, and family members. Abortion is a subject ripe for conscientious debate. This debate should be encouraged and not silenced by either end of the ideological spectrum. However, these discussions can devolve rapidly and become highly unproductive and even hurtful. To keep burned relationship bridges to a minimum, I recommend some ground rules to foster an intelligent discussion with the inherent possibility of changing minds and hearts. I have made suggestions for each side below that could enhance any debate on the subject.

Suggestions for pro-choice advocates:

1. Realize the science of “when life begins” is settled. We know a new strand of human DNA is formed when the sperm and zygote meet at conception. If left to its own devices in utero, it will continue to develop and be born as a fully formed healthy human in 9 months. There is no refuting this. A more compelling debate is whether or not a developing human is a “person.” This is often where the actual disagreement lies, as many feel this is what grants a human its inherent value.

2. Stop alluding to expert medical opinion on the rightness or wrongness of abortion. I recently discussed with a former colleague of mine who suggested that legislators were not making abortion policies based on expert medical opinion. I found this to be an interesting point worth exploring. What medical expert can confer value to a developing human life more than a philosopher, politician, or everyman? Medical expert opinion can tell us what the diagnosis is and what can and can’t be done, but it cannot tell us what “should” be done from a moral standpoint. To quote Jeff Goldblum’s Ian Malcolm in Jurassic Park, “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should.” Medical expert opinion confers no weight on whether or not abortion is moral or immoral.

3. Stop conflating ectopic pregnancies, medical abortion after miscarriage, and maternal health emergencies with elective termination of a viable unborn human. I am not aware of any legislation in any state where these instances would be made illegal. Most if not all anti-abortion advocates realize that these instances are separate and apart from the abortion debate. Invoking these instances is an attempt to manipulate someone into emotionally caving in on an argument. When the vast majority of abortions in the country do not involve rape, incest, or medical emergencies, it is disingenuous to argue that this is the norm.

Suggestions for pro-life advocates:

1. Realize some very tricky ethical situations cause a lot of tension for both mothers and medical providers. The friend I mentioned earlier brought up some severe instances where she considered abortion a practical good, including congenital malformations incompatible with life, pre-viable pre-eclampsia with severe features, and a mother with CVD/CAD. These instances may not sway your opinion, but it is necessary to consider the gravity of some of these terrible situations and try to understand that tension.

2. Strengthen your arguments beyond what you were taught to believe growing up. I am Christian and have been told I feel the way I feel about abortion because my religion has brainwashed me. In truth, I hope my faith permeates all areas of my life, making this statement accurate on some level. However, for the sake of a robust debate, it is not sufficient to state abortion is “wrong,” “evil,” or “sinful.” It will help to bolster your arguments with organized support through data and higher thought. Put in the work to make a compelling case for why you think abortion is wrong.

3. Realize that there will be downstream effects resulting from more births and fewer abortions. Do not run away from this portion of the conversation. You don’t need to agree on every social safety net policy with which you are bombarded. Still, it helps to realize that adjustments in our society need to be made elsewhere to accommodate such drastic societal change.

Suggestions for everyone:

1. Realize our current political environment is far too polarized. We are always only two or three heartbeats away from radical, sweeping socio-political change if we rely on the Supreme Court to legislate for us. If you favor adding seats to the court but would not be willing to confer these seats to judges with constitutional viewpoints opposing yours, then your argument is unproductive. Federal codification or illegalization of abortion should be done at the legislative level.

2. Realize that most people fall between the two extreme sides of the debate, and most of these people are very reasonable. The vast majority of people believe there should be restrictions on abortion but that it should not be made illegal. The media would have you believe the debate is a zero-sum game, but our current government is in no position to codify or outlaw abortion on a federal level. The issue is now left up to the states to vote on the value they place on unborn human life.

3. From a religious perspective, I have a broad view of what I consider evil in this world. However, from a free society standpoint, we need to realize that the vast majority of people on both sides believe they are doing the right thing for society. We may not agree on root causes or solutions, but we need to extend some grace to people trying to do what they feel is right.

I wish you all the best in finding your way through this tumultuous time. May your debates be robust, productive, and informative.

Michael McCutchen is a family physician.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

What is the narrative that you hear when faced with uncertainty?

July 15, 2022 Kevin 0
…
Next

Why the new 988 hotline has the potential to transform mental health care [PODCAST]

July 15, 2022 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
What is the narrative that you hear when faced with uncertainty?
Next Post >
Why the new 988 hotline has the potential to transform mental health care [PODCAST]

More by Michael McCutchen, MD, MBA

  • A human’s a human, no matter how small

    Michael McCutchen, MD, MBA
  • Drop the euphemisms and get uncomfortable when talking about abortion

    Michael McCutchen, MD, MBA
  • When quality measures interfere with good care

    Michael McCutchen, MD, MBA

Related Posts

  • How nurse practitioners can expand abortion access

    Vanessa Shields-Haas, RN
  • Don’t call it universal without including abortion coverage

    Vidya Visvabharathy
  • Health suffers when ground down by poverty

    Janice Boughton, MD
  • Medical bankruptcies happen less frequently than you think

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • For change to happen, humbly look at ourselves

    Gabriella Gonzales, MD and Alexander Rakowsky, MD
  • It’s always easier to judge someone’s failures from higher ground

    Michael Kirsch, MD

More in Policy

  • The realities of immigrant health care served hot from America’s melting pot

    Stella Cho
  • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

    Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN
  • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

    Mohammed Umer Waris, MD
  • Breaking down the barriers to effective bar-code medication administration

    Amy Dang Craft
  • The locums industry has a beef problem

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD
  • Canada’s health workers are sounding the alarm. We must act, now.

    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
    • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
    • The hidden truths of hospital life: What doctors wish you knew

      Emily Stanford, DO | Physician
    • 10 commandments of ethical affiliate marketing for physicians

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Amy Bissada, DO | Finance
    • The heart of a Desi doctor: Balancing emotions and resources in oncology

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
    • Safe sex for seniors: Dispelling myths and embracing safe practices [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Overcoming Parkinson’s: a journey of laughter and resilience

      Cynthia Poire Mathews, FNP | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 10 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Oral Roflumilast Effective in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis
  • Pre-Existing Heart Failure Tied to Higher Mortality in Lymphoma
  • Providing Abortions in Alabama; FDA's Formula Woes; Unread Claims Rejected
  • Resiliency Starts With High-Reliability Healthcare Systems
  • 'No Safe Place': Shooting Hits Home for Nashville Doctors

Meeting Coverage

  • Oral Roflumilast Effective in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis
  • Phase III Trials 'Hit a Home Run' in Advanced Endometrial Cancer
  • Cannabis Use Common in Post-Surgery Patients on Opioid Tapering
  • Less Abuse With Extended-Release Oxycodone, Poison Center Data Suggest
  • Novel Strategies Show Winning Potential in Ovarian Cancer
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
    • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
    • The hidden truths of hospital life: What doctors wish you knew

      Emily Stanford, DO | Physician
    • 10 commandments of ethical affiliate marketing for physicians

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Amy Bissada, DO | Finance
    • The heart of a Desi doctor: Balancing emotions and resources in oncology

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
    • Safe sex for seniors: Dispelling myths and embracing safe practices [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Overcoming Parkinson’s: a journey of laughter and resilience

      Cynthia Poire Mathews, FNP | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Abortion debates need to happen, but both sides need some ground rules
10 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...