Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Are we opening everything too quickly?

Tejas Sekhar
Policy
February 21, 2022
4 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

In “Open Everything” published in The Atlantic on February 9th, 2022, Yascha Mounk discusses his arguments for lifting any remaining COVID-19 restrictions to “shake off the pandemic malaise.” He asserts that we are “in danger of prolonging the status quo more than is justifiable” and that “the time to end pandemic restrictions is now.” The broad strokes that Mounk makes are diametrically opposed to substantiated public health policy that currently exists as well as the minutiae of circumstances relative to COVID-19 when viewed from an equitable lens. I find his claims to be inattentive to the differences in American public health infrastructure that exist at local, city, and state levels, and come from a place of privilege tied to educational status and economic freedom that not all Americans are necessarily privy to.

Mounk states that “the strongest reason to keep up pandemic restrictions is that some people remain vulnerable” including unvaccinated people as the primordial example. He follows up with the rhetorical question, “What do we owe to them?” This argument is flawed for several reasons. First and foremost, by focusing on the unvaccinated, Mounk neglects two populations that are also highly susceptible to contraction of COVID-19 regardless of vaccination status: the elderly and the immunocompromised. While individuals of these two groups may be vaccinated, their weakened immune systems render them much more vulnerable than a younger vaccinated individual with a fully intact immune system. Also consider the case of children under the age of 5 years old, who are ineligible to receive the vaccine. Thus, vaccines are not the “end all, be all” seems to implicitly affirm. And neither is Paxlovid, the antiviral drug created by Pfizer with promising clinical results, as it is not yet standard of care and by no means fully accessible throughout the country.

Mindsets such as Mounk’s appear to normalize the idea of getting infected, as preventive measures and treatment strategies exist that will avert serious illness or complications caused by COVID-19. With varied pharmacogenetics from person to person and the possibility of developing long COVID, the course of one’s coronavirus infection is not standardized simply on the basis of vaccination status or demographics. Furthermore, viruses like COVID-19 do not simply exist in a vacuum, as they constantly mutate and correspondingly change in infectiousness and virulency as seen with the Delta and Omicron variants. The data about individuals who are fully vaccinated and boosted that contract COVID-19 should inform the American public that we should continue to keep our distance and mask up, even if many who test positive are asymptomatic as they are still viral carriers and transmitters of the disease (possibly even increasingly so, given the lack of telltale symptomatology). The declaration to adopt a laissez-faire attitude to the spread of COVID-19 is misguided, ableist, and based upon a sense of false confidence about our collective safety from the virus.

Returning back to Mounk’s claim that we do not owe anything to at-risk populations, Mounk’s example of unvaccinated people does not detail the level of nuance that truly exists among unvaccinated populations. The stereotype about unvaccinated people as uneducated and uneducable does not account for educational and health literacy disparities that directly coincide with lower socioeconomic status. This assumption places undue culpability on the individual without recognition of the accessibility barriers that at-risk populations are predisposed to.

While many of us may be fortunate enough to possess an adequate understanding of the underlying science that wards off misconceptions or conspiracy theories surrounding vaccines, there are legitimate risks and side effects to the vaccine, even if the rate of complications is low. This consideration is further marked by tangible symptoms one might experience as their body develops antibodies in response to vaccination and extensive historical trauma perpetuated against vulnerable populations (e.g., the Tuskegee Syphilis Study). Moreover, at-risk populations experience the highest incidence and mortality rates due to COVID-19, which magnifies the decisions and effects of the societally powerful against those with much less.

Mounk asserts that “Wearing a mask in highly vaccinated New York does little to save an unmasked person in barely vaccinated Mississippi.” If you were to take this concept and apply it unilaterally to the topic of voting in a highly populated state, many would argue that you still have a civic responsibility to vote regardless of what the polls, predicted outcomes, or what anyone or anything else might say. Similarly, our social contract extends this far as well; just because one’s potential risk may be purportedly lowered in certain areas, our obligation as health-conscious citizens does not cease to exist. Mounk’s proposal that “we should be willing to tolerate some risk of infectious disease” strikes me as incongruent with the goals of health care and public health altogether. If we strived to simply reduce the number of hospitalizations or injuries to a certain annual threshold, we would be missing the point entirely. While benchmarks are certainly an important motivating and tangible measure of success, why would anyone stop short of a goal when it relates to public health and safety? While coronavirus is considerably different from any sort of infectious disease that has had a large-scale effect in recent history, imagine if the researchers who developed the smallpox vaccine decided to stop their efforts once 50 percent or 60 percent of the global population was no longer susceptible to the disease.

Mounk’s article is sorely lacking from the point of view of public health experts and officials, and rightfully so — Mounk’s perspective is largely contentious to anyone with a science or health care background, and the lack of data and verifiable policy recommendations that support his standpoint reflects this. If the CDC is not recommending an end to mask mandates and pandemic restrictions, who is anyone to disagree otherwise, especially without the appropriate medical/public health education or industry-specific experience to inform their claims? In reality, I can only contend that Mounk’s piece is largely performative and is simply a lamentable commentary regarding the current state of public health in the United States, and the privilege to dismiss COVID-19 as a matter of inconvenience. Otherwise, “Open Everything” is simply an appeasement to the educated elite without regard to current public health policy or existing inequity across health literacy, socioeconomic status, and educational attainment. And in the grand scheme of things, pandemic “restrictions” like wearing masks and attending events occurring with proper precautions in place is not the end of the world that Mounk makes it out to be.

Tejas Sekhar is a graduate student.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Viral nomenclature or a sign of our times?

February 21, 2022 Kevin 0
…
Next

Who will heal the physician?

February 21, 2022 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: COVID, Infectious Disease

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Viral nomenclature or a sign of our times?
Next Post >
Who will heal the physician?

More by Tejas Sekhar

  • Roe v. Wade: questions that need to be addressed in the near future

    Tejas Sekhar
  • Inhaler nonadherence and social determinants of health

    Tejas Sekhar

Related Posts

  • COVID-19 shows why we need health insurance

    Jingyi Liu, MD
  • Where’s the big COVID data?

    Anuradha Kolluru, MD and Rakesh Lattupalli, MD
  • Major medical groups back mandatory COVID vaccine for health care workers

    Molly Walker
  • To treat future COVID variants, we need more than vaccines

    Ian Chan, MBA
  • Is it time for a true federal COVID vaccine mandate?

    Shetal Shah, MD
  • The COVID vaccine selfie: The caption matters as much as the picture

    Alicia Billington, MD, PhD

More in Policy

  • Why the WHO’s pandemic accord is critical for global health care

    Elizabeth Métraux
  • The revolutionary Kaiser-Geisinger deal: How health care giants are reshaping the industry and empowering patients

    Robert Pearl, MD
  • Unveiling the intricate link between housing costs and health care

    Harvey Castro, MD, MBA
  • Uncovering the truth about racial health inequities in America: a book review

    John Paul Mikhaiel, MD
  • Why affirmative action is crucial for health equity and social justice in medicine

    Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH
  • The untold story of Hispanic/Latino health: Why subgroup data matters

    Matthew B. Alonso
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The power of coaching for physicians: transforming thoughts, changing lives

      Kim Downey, PT | Conditions
    • The hidden factor in physician burnout: How the climate crisis is contributing to the erosion of well-being

      Elizabeth Cerceo, MD | Physician
    • Physician entrepreneurs offer hope for burned out doctors

      Cindy Rubin, MD | Physician
    • We need a new Hippocratic Oath that puts patient autonomy first

      Jeffrey A. Singer, MD | Physician
    • Boxing legends Tyson and Foreman: powerful lessons for a resilient and evolving health care future

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Is chaos in health care leading us towards socialized medicine? How physician burnout is a catalyst.

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Breaking point: the 5 reasons American doctors are dreaming of walking away from medicine

      Amol Shrikhande, MD | Physician
    • It’s time to replace the 0 to 10 pain intensity scale with a better measure

      Mark Sullivan, MD and Jane Ballantyne, MD | Conditions
    • “Is your surgeon really skilled? The hidden threat to public safety in medicine.

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
    • Unveiling the hidden damage: the secretive world of medical boards

      Alan Lindemann, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of racism in health care: a call for anti-racist action

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Policy
    • Revolutionize your practice: the value-based care model that reduces physician burnout

      Chandravadan Patel, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Empowering Black nurses for lasting change [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Master time management with 7 productivity strategies for optimal results

      Farzana Hoque, MD | Physician
    • Proposed USPSTF guideline update: Advocating for earlier breast cancer screening at age 40

      Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian | Conditions
    • The rising threat of lung cancer in Asian American female nonsmokers

      Alice S. Y. Lee, MD | Conditions
    • The tragic story of Mr. G: a painful journey towards understanding suicide

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Healing trauma and reconnecting: Unmasking the impact of dissociation [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Novel Anti-HER2 Drugs 'Impressive' in Advanced Biliary Cancer
  • What Was Tied to Lower Long COVID Risk?
  • Chemo-Free Approach Works in Subset of Patients With HER2+ Early Breast Cancer
  • Two-Drug Combo Wins for Refractory Gout
  • First-in-Class Sjogren's Drug Passes Mid-Stage Test

Meeting Coverage

  • Novel Anti-HER2 Drugs 'Impressive' in Advanced Biliary Cancer
  • Chemo-Free Approach Works in Subset of Patients With HER2+ Early Breast Cancer
  • Two-Drug Combo Wins for Refractory Gout
  • First-in-Class Sjogren's Drug Passes Mid-Stage Test
  • Pricey Drug Combo Boosts PFS in First-Line Advanced Ovarian Cancer
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The power of coaching for physicians: transforming thoughts, changing lives

      Kim Downey, PT | Conditions
    • The hidden factor in physician burnout: How the climate crisis is contributing to the erosion of well-being

      Elizabeth Cerceo, MD | Physician
    • Physician entrepreneurs offer hope for burned out doctors

      Cindy Rubin, MD | Physician
    • We need a new Hippocratic Oath that puts patient autonomy first

      Jeffrey A. Singer, MD | Physician
    • Boxing legends Tyson and Foreman: powerful lessons for a resilient and evolving health care future

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Is chaos in health care leading us towards socialized medicine? How physician burnout is a catalyst.

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Breaking point: the 5 reasons American doctors are dreaming of walking away from medicine

      Amol Shrikhande, MD | Physician
    • It’s time to replace the 0 to 10 pain intensity scale with a better measure

      Mark Sullivan, MD and Jane Ballantyne, MD | Conditions
    • “Is your surgeon really skilled? The hidden threat to public safety in medicine.

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
    • Unveiling the hidden damage: the secretive world of medical boards

      Alan Lindemann, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of racism in health care: a call for anti-racist action

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Policy
    • Revolutionize your practice: the value-based care model that reduces physician burnout

      Chandravadan Patel, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Empowering Black nurses for lasting change [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Master time management with 7 productivity strategies for optimal results

      Farzana Hoque, MD | Physician
    • Proposed USPSTF guideline update: Advocating for earlier breast cancer screening at age 40

      Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian | Conditions
    • The rising threat of lung cancer in Asian American female nonsmokers

      Alice S. Y. Lee, MD | Conditions
    • The tragic story of Mr. G: a painful journey towards understanding suicide

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Healing trauma and reconnecting: Unmasking the impact of dissociation [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Are we opening everything too quickly?
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...