Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How health insurance affects patients: That means the transgender community too

Gabriela Ramirez
Policy
December 21, 2020
80 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

Coming into Columbia University as a pre-med first-year student, I expected to be studying anatomy, biology, psychology, and many other subjects. I would have never thought that I would encounter gender and sexuality studies. Interestingly, this led to my discovery of a very pressing issue that not only affects the transgender community, but potentially many other people who rely on health insurance, like me. In recent years, health insurances have become more restrictive by placing more regulations on who can be covered and for what treatments. In light of this, there seems to be an increasing need for medical professionals to formulate diagnosis criteria that help patients by enabling insurance coverage for their treatment. However, this act made by many medical professionals today in good faith to benefit the patients can have the opposite effect and harm patients in adverse ways. A clear example of this issue is how greatly the classification of gender dysphoria in the DSM, the national diagnostic manual for psychiatry, has affected the transgender community.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or the DSM for short, is authored by the American Psychiatric Association and offers diagnostic criteria for psychiatrists to follow. In 1980, the DSM first mentioned the condition of gender identity disorder, whose name later changed to gender dysphoria in the 5th version of the DSM released in 2013. This medical condition is what psychiatry defines as the distress or discomfort that affected patients have with their biological sex characteristics and its incongruence with the gender they identify with. Those diagnosed with gender dysphoria usually are or become to identify as transgender or sometimes gender non-conforming. It is important to note that even though not all transgender people have experienced gender dysphoria, a great number have. Thus, the diagnosis of GD in the DSM has affected most of the transgender community.

Now, what is so wrong about the DSM classifying gender dysphoria as a disease? Well, unfortunately, it has allowed for the stigmatization against the transgender community to continue throughout the last decades. To reduce the stigma, in 2013, the APA decided to change the name of this condition, as stated in their DSM-V pre-release statement, believing that eliminating the word “disorder” would remove the negative connotation that comes with it. Yet, the LGBTQ+ specialist Zowie Davy, as mentioned in her article, “The DSM-5 and the Politics of Diagnosing Transpeople,” argues that many trans movements would insist that this name change does not significantly reduce the stigma against its transgender patients.

Moreover, there is an added stressor for the patients to conform to what the DSM defines as the symptoms necessary to qualify for treatment. As Davy bluntly puts it, “… transpeople tend to tailor their clinical narratives because they realize that psychiatrists have the power to stop their transitioning process”. This means that many gender dysphoria patients cannot honestly come forward to psychiatrists because they know that if they do not behave as the “standard transgender” model that the DSM creates, they would not be covered by their medical insurance. It is important to note that I am not saying that these psychiatrists are malicious and do not want to help their patients. Rather, I am saying that there seems to be a pressure to fit the specific diagnostic criteria from the patient’s perspective because otherwise, they would not get covered by insurance at all.

From the creation of the 3rd edition of the DSM in 1980 until the present day, the Workgroup on Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders has been appointed by the APA to update the diagnostic criteria of GID/GD. One of its members, the GD specialist Jack Drescher, defends their actions in his article “Controversies in Gender Diagnoses,” by arguing that “… [the DSM] working group wrestled with the challenges of reducing stigma (which underlies the call for [the] removal of the gender diagnoses) and maintaining access to care (which requires the existence of a diagnosis to obtain needed medical treatment covered by third-party payers)”. This means that to stop stigmatizing or oppressing transgender people, the APA would have to obliterate the diagnosis, which would prevent the medical insurance coverage of treatments such as hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgeries. An option that may not be preferred by many GD patients since they do need their treatment, which is difficult to obtain without insurance coverage. Understandably, the specialists formulating the diagnostic criteria and definitions do not have it easy, as Drescher would claim, since “… it is difficult to find reconciling language that removes the stigma of having a mental disorder diagnosis.” The APA workgroup is in a difficult situation where they have to balance the economic and social aspects of the patients’ interests.

This issue is complex since both sides have very justifiable claims, which shows us how such debates are difficult to deal with in the medical field. It is understandable that medical professionals, like the American Psychiatry Association specialists, are trying their best to help their patients by making sure their health insurance economically covers them. But it is imperative to realize how this sometimes negatively affects the patients, such as allowing stigma and oppression to continue against the trans community. If change does not happen, the stigma against the transgender community will continue. Still, if the APA eliminates the GD from the DSM, we would be looking at a society that denies insurance coverage for their treatments. While this issue does not have a clear solution, it would help if several medical professionals would take this in mind and rethink how they believe they are helping their patients.

Gabriela Ramirez is a premedical student.

Image credits: Shutterstock.com

Prev

A surgeon's take on the WSJ's Jill Biden doctor debacle

December 21, 2020 Kevin 5
…
Next

The FDA should consider vitamin D as a pharmaceutical agent for COVID

December 21, 2020 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A surgeon's take on the WSJ's Jill Biden doctor debacle
Next Post >
The FDA should consider vitamin D as a pharmaceutical agent for COVID

Related Posts

  • Here’s why health insurance is different from other insurance

    Joseph Crisp
  • Why is health insurance so unaffordable?

    Emily O'Rourke, MD
  • Think you have health insurance? Think again.

    Asser Shahin, MD
  • High deductible health insurance is bankrupting Americans

    Ben Aiken, MD
  • The skinny on skinny health insurance

    Mark Kelley, MD
  • COVID-19 shows why we need health insurance

    Jingyi Liu, MD

More in Policy

  • The realities of immigrant health care served hot from America’s melting pot

    Stella Cho
  • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

    Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN
  • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

    Mohammed Umer Waris, MD
  • Breaking down the barriers to effective bar-code medication administration

    Amy Dang Craft
  • The locums industry has a beef problem

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD
  • Canada’s health workers are sounding the alarm. We must act, now.

    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds
    • How this doctor found her passion in ballroom dancing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Surviving and thriving after life’s most difficult moments

      Rebecca Fogg, MBA | Conditions
    • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Make the Diagnosis: This Bump on His Nose is a Tricky Diagnosis
  • CRT Regimen Boosts Complete Response Rate in Unresectable Vulvar Cancer
  • Fla. Doc Charged With Murder; McConnell Exits Rehab Facility; BPA on Store Receipts
  • FDA Faults Next-Gen Olympus Duodenoscopes
  • CDK4/6 Inhibition Active in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Meeting Coverage

  • CRT Regimen Boosts Complete Response Rate in Unresectable Vulvar Cancer
  • CDK4/6 Inhibition Active in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
  • Switch to IL-23 Blocker Yields Deep Responses in Recalcitrant Plaque Psoriasis
  • Biomarkers of Response With Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Cancer
  • At-Home Topical Therapy for Molluscum Contagiosum Gets High Marks
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds
    • How this doctor found her passion in ballroom dancing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Surviving and thriving after life’s most difficult moments

      Rebecca Fogg, MBA | Conditions
    • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

How health insurance affects patients: That means the transgender community too
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...