Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

An emergency physician makes the case for circumcision

Paul Blackburn, DO
Conditions
May 9, 2018
552 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

Whether to circumcise a newborn male child is not the simple, binary “yes/no” question it appears to be. Rather, the choice is affected by an astonishing array of issues: religion, culture, health and hygiene, sexually transmitted infections, expense, pain and medical recommendations. Some cite ethical concerns regarding usurpation of a child’s free choice. Others claim an equivalency between neonatal male circumcision and the practice of female genital mutilation.

As a practicing physician, I have safely performed dozens of male infant circumcisions and many more on adults. During 30-plus years of emergency medicine, I have encountered nearly every problem an uncircumcised male can encounter: chronic urinary tract infections, refractory problems from medical diseases, the need for emergent surgery due to scarring or pain and even strangulation of the penis’ blood supply. Circumcision eliminates all these conditions.

Additionally, there is compelling evidence that circumcision reduces the risk of obtaining or transmitting serious sexually transmitted infections.

Male circumcision is a simple, safe, and inexpensive procedure. There are no adverse effects to the removal of the foreskin. Circumcision is exceptionally safe when performed in infancy, with complications in fewer than one-half of one percent of cases. Use of anesthetics renders the process virtually painless.

Despite its clear benefits, the rate of circumcision in the U.S. has been steadily declining. It is not a reportable procedure. Therefore, statistics only reflect voluntarily submitted survey information regarding hospital-born infants circumcised before discharge. Not included are males who undergo the procedure later, such as for religious, cultural or reimbursement reasons. But the downward trend is real. A Center for Disease Control (CDC) study found that the average U.S. circumcision rate has fallen from 56% of newborns in 2006 to only 33% in 2009. It is difficult to imagine that only 80 years ago the rate of circumcision in the US was as high as 81% of all baby boys.

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) information from twenty-six states (1998 – 2006) confirmed this downward trend. The rate of circumcision fell in 11 states, remained unchanged in 11, and rose by 1% in only four. In my home state of Arizona, the rate of circumcision dropped 18% during this time, primarily due to lack of Medicaid reimbursement. One year before the Medicaid provision was cut, 41% of boys born in Arizona were circumcised in a hospital. Two years later, that number had fallen to 26%, with the latest reported information showing only 20% undergoing the procedure.

Statistics from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) reflect the distinctly regional rates of circumcision. The NHDS gathers data in four census regions. The lowering non-circumcision rate has been consistent in the Western Region for some time, while the Southern Region now approaches parity of circumcision vs. uncircumcised.

The practice of routine circumcision in the U.S. is beginning to parallel the Northern European and Scandinavian experience of declining rates since World War II.

Why is this?

Youth are more skeptical of the practice. A YouGov survey found only 33% of 18-29 year-olds said that male children should be routinely circumcised, compared to 43% of 30-44 year-olds, 52% of 45-64 year-olds and nearly 66% of seniors. The number of millennials who view circumcision as an individual choice is nearly identical to the number espousing individual choice regarding childhood vaccination.

Not surprisingly, politics play a role. In 2011 San Francisco unsuccessfully attempted to ban the practice. Illegal in South Africa and Sweden, a current similar movement in Iceland is being fiercely resisted. Opponents claim that the intention is more to reduce immigration than circumcision since the Muslim faith requires circumcision.

No major medical organization recommends routine circumcision other than in areas of high HIV prevalence in Africa, where it serves as effective prevention. The Danish College of General Practitioners even calls medically unnecessary circumcision “mutilation.”

Yet no major medical organization in the world calls for banning routine circumcision, either.

Notably, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) holds that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks. This is because of the demonstrated reduction in transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (syphilis, genital herpes) and human papillomavirus (genital warts, penile and cervical cancer) and reduction of infant urinary tract infections. While stopping short of recommending routine circumcision, the AAP recommends third-party reimbursement for the procedure.

Likewise, the CDC does not recommend routine circumcision. However, their studies note its effectiveness in preventing STD and HIV transmission and suggest that routine circumcision would result in cost savings to society. Health experts and economists at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine warned that if circumcision rates in the United States fall to the same level as in Europe, it could add more than $4 billion in health care costs over a decade.

Due to ethical concerns, should we ban all “unnecessary” childhood interventions, including piercing ears? Of course not. Parents are assumed to have the child’s welfare as a top priority. A thoughtful decision based on the risks and benefits of the procedure are in the child’s best interests.

Delaying the procedure until the individual can decide for themselves is not realistic. Few teens would choose to participate in a discussion about their own circumcision, let alone consider undergoing the procedure. And do teens actually have the capacity to truly understand the impact of the issues involved? Important ethical concerns arise since the complication rate for later circumcision rises ten to twenty-fold. And a harsh reality is that adult circumcision is not reimbursed unless performed for medical necessity.

It is starkly evident that lack of third-party reimbursement is directly related to significantly lower rates of circumcision. The cost of the procedure is insurmountable to many individuals. Insurance company reimbursement appears completely scattershot. Some pay without question. Many follow Medicaid policy and balk paying for a “medically unnecessary” procedure. Others will pay but prefer a deferred office procedure due to decreased expense. UCLA researchers found that at hospitals in the 16 states where the procedure is not covered by Medicaid, circumcision rates were 24 percentage points lower than at hospitals in other states, with lower rates particularly prevalent among Hispanics.

The ultimate question surrounding circumcision is whether the medical benefits outweigh the risks of performing the procedure. If the only benefits were prevention of relatively rare penile cancer or the acquired medical or surgical problems, it might be questionable. However, by adding the prevention of chronic urinary infections and the reduction of STD and HIV transmission, the risk/benefit ratio suddenly tilts heavily toward benefit.

How do we reverse the declining rates of circumcision? The first step is to educate, particularly the skeptical youth, regarding the many positives resulting from circumcision. Secondly, the AAP and CDC already recognize the health benefits. The endorsement of routine circumcision by these influential organizations would generate tremendous inertia toward the goal of universal neonatal circumcision. Lastly, requiring insurance companies and Medicare to provide reimbursement would not only increase circumcision rates but would eliminate any potential disparity in rates of circumcision for those that cannot afford it.

Paul Blackburn is an emergency physician.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Does federal law violate our right to health care?

May 9, 2018 Kevin 3
…
Next

When someone is not dead but not alive

May 9, 2018 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Emergency Medicine, Pediatrics

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Does federal law violate our right to health care?
Next Post >
When someone is not dead but not alive

More by Paul Blackburn, DO

  • The pain score must go. Here’s why.

    Paul Blackburn, DO

Related Posts

  • Denying payment for emergency care: a physician defends insurers

    Michael Kirsch, MD
  • A prayer from an emergency physician

    Edwin Leap, MD
  • The climate crisis as viewed by an emergency physician

    Elizabeth M. Barreras-Rivest, MD
  • A physician’s addiction to social media

    Amanda Xi, MD
  • How working as a flight attendant made me a better physician

    Alexie Puran, MD
  • How a physician keynote can highlight your conference

    Kevin Pho, MD

More in Conditions

  • Unlocking the secret to successful weight loss: Curiosity is the key

    Franchell Hamilton, MD
  • The teacher who changed my life through reading

    Raymond Abbott
  • Revaluating mental health assessments: It’s not just the patient you should consider

    Tomi Mitchell, MD
  • Breaking down barriers: How technology is improving diabetes management in underserved communities

    Anonymous
  • Yoga and self-care won’t cure my Crohn’s disease

    Kristen L. Cole
  • What causes fainting and how to prevent it during needle procedures

    Jean Paul Brutus, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • Lifestyle change: the forgotten solution in health care

      Tyler Petersen | Conditions
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the stigma: Addressing the struggles of physicians

      Jean Antonucci, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • How medical student loan forgiveness can advance health equity [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The rise of generative AI in health care: Here’s what you need to know

      Anil Saldanha | Tech
    • Finding peace through surrender: a personal exploration

      Dympna Weil, MD | Physician
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Unlocking the secret to successful weight loss: Curiosity is the key

      Franchell Hamilton, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 8 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Heart Failure's Obesity Paradox Falls Apart on Further Inspection
  • Nobody Wants This Job. Should Physicians Stick Around?
  • Early Postpartum IUD Placement Yields Low Complete Expulsion Rate
  • Hydrocortisone Reduced Mortality in Patients With Severe Pneumonia
  • Obesity Tied to Density of Food Stores Carrying Less Healthy Options, Report Finds

Meeting Coverage

  • Trial of Novel TYK2 Inhibitor Hits Its Endpoint in Plaque Psoriasis
  • Durable Vitiligo Responses With Topical Ruxolitinib
  • High Rates of Psoriasis Clearance With Investigational TYK2 Inhibitor
  • Rapid Improvement in Atopic Dermatitis With Topical PDE4 Inhibitor
  • New Approaches in the Bladder-Sparing Paradigm
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • Lifestyle change: the forgotten solution in health care

      Tyler Petersen | Conditions
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the stigma: Addressing the struggles of physicians

      Jean Antonucci, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • How medical student loan forgiveness can advance health equity [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The rise of generative AI in health care: Here’s what you need to know

      Anil Saldanha | Tech
    • Finding peace through surrender: a personal exploration

      Dympna Weil, MD | Physician
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Unlocking the secret to successful weight loss: Curiosity is the key

      Franchell Hamilton, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

An emergency physician makes the case for circumcision
8 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...