Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Screening: Do you follow guidelines or your gut?

Dana Corriel, MD
Conditions
December 13, 2017
121 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

The commentary below is meant to invoke meaningful discourse rather than incite an unpleasant argument.

Less than a year ago, I heard Ben Stiller doling out kudos to his heroic doctor who diagnosed him with early-stage prostate cancer by using a simple, widespread screen.

What was interesting was that Stiller was actually underage. What I mean is that the star was not of age to be screened, according to current prostate cancer screening guidelines (American Cancer Association’s guidelines). He was in his mid-forties.

The guidelines are pretty straightforward. Men over the age of 50 can be screened after an informed consent discussion with their physician outlining risks and benefits. Men of African American descent or someone who has a first-degree relative with prostate cancer are to start at an earlier age (often 40 or 45).

But interestingly, Stiller didn’t seem to qualify for either of these two categories. At least, that didn’t seem to be the case. His doctor may have acted outside of guideline parameters, but became an instant hero. And he was indeed a hero. He was thinking outside the box.

But if thinking outside the box translates into screening patients blindly and outside of guideline parameters, why follow any of these parameters at all? Couldn’t we all be extra thoughtful as physicians and offer the screen extra early?

Stiller’s miraculous diagnosis brings to light the dilemma faced by practitioners everywhere when considering patient screens: What the guidelines say versus what we want to do to satisfy patients. When our hearts want patients both healthy and happy, it could translate into tweaking the parameters or the way in which we interpret them. Think of it as VIP treatment. Getting an early screen is the equivalent of backstage passes to a show because you know someone. But what if I consider all of my patients VIP? Because I do — I want to save them all. That’s when I’m in a bind. Did Stiller’s physician do it because of the fame or because he screens every single patient earlier than recommended?

Couldn’t we all be thoughtful as physicians and offer the screen extra early?

We often face this question.

A patient asks to screen for “every type of cancer, regardless of risk factors, regardless of age.” I understand where they’re coming from — they’re equating diagnosis with increased longevity. But this often puts us, as practitioners, in a difficult spot because we know that’s not always the case. And when completely not indicated (think CA-125 or CEA tested randomly) it can be hard to say no. I’d even go further and bet that denials of these specific requests are proportional to negative patient reviews.

So how does one approach such predicaments?

By adhering to guidelines, that’s how. Because they provide just that — a guide. When we practice academically, we’re following rules set out by years of scientific research and backing. Otherwise, how would one know when to screen? Yearly? Monthly? Or — brace yourselves at this one — at the patient’s discretion? Heck, I’d consider screening at birth if I could. And if it meant longer survivals for patients, I’d take it a step further — why not screen in utero? (I say this tongue-in-cheek but also to make a point. I also realize there actually are in-utero screens, but those typically make sense!).

The screen-specific to prostate cancer is indeed a simple one: a blood test called PSA (prostate-specific antigen). While not perfect, it’s relatively effortless and typically performed at one’s annual. The needle goes in and the test is over.

Stiller said yes to this particular screen. But what surprised me about his case was, again, that the screen had been offered in the first place. It seems that his doctor may have had a sixth sense of sorts, I’m thinking, because Stiller says, “What I had — and I’m healthy today because of it — was a thoughtful internist who felt like I was around the age to start checking my PSA level and discussed it with me.”

The needle goes in and, chop, chop, the test is over.

I don’t take issue with Stiller’s message. What I don’t quite agree with is the wording of it — it serves to frighten, to send fans out reflexively, even blindly, in search of this magic screen.

And it’s not as miraculous as it seems. None of the specifics are discussed, especially not even the negatives behind it. For example, did you know that less than one in three men with an elevated screen turn out to have prostate cancer? I won’t even mention the size of the needle used to biopsy the prostate, the route taken to insert it (the prostate can be reached through the rectal area) or the pain.

A screen, by nature of that term, means no symptoms warrant the test. The age at which it’s performed is determined by factors like age, risks, and exposures. Thankfully, we’re practicing in a modern age of medicine and no longer have to “feel” when it’s right to perform these tests — mainly because we follow guidelines derived from standardized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. And thank goodness for these advances.

I refuse to believe that an accurate gauge of the “thoughtfulness” of a physician is whether or not they “feel” like performing a screen.

You can view it as “mincing words” on my part, but I like medical messages that are clearly conveyed without cause for confusion or panic. I think it’s an important part of delivering them to an audience because they are so often misconstrued.

But I also get that it’s difficult to get them perfect, especially in speaking engagements, when on the spot and off the cuff.

Despite it all, at the end of the day, Stiller did get it right because he increased awareness, and I commend him for that.

It’s the perfect opportunity to call out other voices — the real voices in medicine — so that more of us can spread these positive messages in the right way.

Dana Corriel is an internal medicine physician who blogs at drcorriel.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

What’s in a woman physician’s last name? A lot.

December 13, 2017 Kevin 27
…
Next

Motivating patients to stop smoking and lose weight before surgery

December 13, 2017 Kevin 2
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
What’s in a woman physician’s last name? A lot.
Next Post >
Motivating patients to stop smoking and lose weight before surgery

More by Dana Corriel, MD

  • Your doctor may need lessons from a used car salesman

    Dana Corriel, MD
  • The human touch in medicine: good or bad?

    Dana Corriel, MD
  • Physicians: scared of social media? Stop and dive in.

    Dana Corriel, MD

Related Posts

  • When breast cancer screening guidelines conflict: Some patients face real consequences

    Leda Dederich
  • The new aspirin guidelines: The media does a disservice to patients

    Olubadewa A. Fatunde, MD, MPH
  • Hormone replacement therapy is still linked to cancer

    Martha Rosenberg
  • We have a shot at preventing cervical cancer

    Lisa N. Abaid, MD, MPH
  • Obstruction of medical justice: How health care fails patients with cancer

    Miriam A. Knoll, MD
  • Despite progress in cancer care, cost and equity challenges still must be addressed

    David M. Aboulafia, MD

More in Conditions

  • The beauty of a patient’s gratitude

    Dr. Damane Zehra
  • From clocking in to clocking out: the transition to retirement

    Debbie Moore-Black, RN
  • Overcoming Parkinson’s: a journey of laughter and resilience

    Cynthia Poire Mathews, FNP
  • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

    Denise Reich
  • Maximize sleep efficiency with stimulus control

    Pedram Navab, DO
  • The endless waves of chronic illness

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • Beyond pizza and pens: National Doctors’ Day should be about saving lives

      James Young, MD | Physician
    • Physicians are a finite resource we need to protect

      Jack Resneck, Jr., MD | Physician
    • From clocking in to clocking out: the transition to retirement

      Debbie Moore-Black, RN | Conditions
    • Unlearning our habits: a journey from intelligence to wisdom

      Brian Sayers, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Unlearning our habits: a journey from intelligence to wisdom

      Brian Sayers, MD | Physician
    • Lessons from an orthopedic surgery journey [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Beyond pizza and pens: National Doctors’ Day should be about saving lives

      James Young, MD | Physician
    • Maximizing physician potential: How coaching can aid in conflict resolution, enhance health care leadership and build stronger teams

      Asha Padmanabhan, MD | Physician
    • The future of education: AI empowerment, YouTube college credits, and the impact on traditional colleges

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The beauty of a patient’s gratitude

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Moderna's Steep COVID Vaccine Price: Corporate Greed or Capitalism?
  • House Republican Argues Against FDA Budget Increase
  • Prescriptions for Stimulants Jumped During the Pandemic
  • Federal Judge Strikes Down ACA's Preventive Care Coverage Requirements
  • Pandemic Jump in ED Visits for Firearm Injuries Continued Into 2022

Meeting Coverage

  • VTE Risk in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Increases With More Lines of Chemotherapy
  • Obesity's Impact on Uterine Cancer Risk Greater in Younger Age Groups
  • Oral Roflumilast Effective in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis
  • Phase III Trials 'Hit a Home Run' in Advanced Endometrial Cancer
  • Cannabis Use Common in Post-Surgery Patients on Opioid Tapering
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • Beyond pizza and pens: National Doctors’ Day should be about saving lives

      James Young, MD | Physician
    • Physicians are a finite resource we need to protect

      Jack Resneck, Jr., MD | Physician
    • From clocking in to clocking out: the transition to retirement

      Debbie Moore-Black, RN | Conditions
    • Unlearning our habits: a journey from intelligence to wisdom

      Brian Sayers, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Unlearning our habits: a journey from intelligence to wisdom

      Brian Sayers, MD | Physician
    • Lessons from an orthopedic surgery journey [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Beyond pizza and pens: National Doctors’ Day should be about saving lives

      James Young, MD | Physician
    • Maximizing physician potential: How coaching can aid in conflict resolution, enhance health care leadership and build stronger teams

      Asha Padmanabhan, MD | Physician
    • The future of education: AI empowerment, YouTube college credits, and the impact on traditional colleges

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The beauty of a patient’s gratitude

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Screening: Do you follow guidelines or your gut?
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...