Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

It’s time we look at the Australian health system for lessons

Brian C. Joondeph, MD
Policy
May 22, 2017
571 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

President Donald Trump in a recent press briefing with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced, “Of course the Australians have better health care than we do – everybody does.” On the heels of the House narrowly passing the first in many steps toward Obamacare repeal and replace, President Trump’s comment caused a bit of a stir, to say the least.

MSNBC was all over it. Chris Hayes interviewed fellow socialist Senator Bernie Sanders who was giddy over Trump’s comment. “Thank you Mr. Trump for admitting that universal health care is the better way to go,’’ he crowed. Bernie laughed out loud over this, almost as funny a moment for him as when he learned CNN was feeding debate questions to his primary opponent Hillary Clinton.

What did Trump mean? Does Australia have better health care or a better system for delivering health care services to their citizens?

Health care can be measured in many ways such as disease incidence, prevalence and survival rates for heart disease and cancer. One measure is the death rate for all types of cancer where the U.S. narrowly outperforms Australia. I’m sure the president was not delivering a public health lecture. Instead, he was speaking of how health care is delivered in the two countries.

In the United States, health care is delivered by a hodgepodge of public and private systems. Medicaid for the poor. Medicare for the elderly. The VA system for veterans. Employer-based insurance for most working-age adults and their families. And finally, individual plans through Obamacare for everyone else. All with myriad rules, regulations, and restrictions imposed by the federal government. And all financially unsustainable, kept solvent by the federal government’s unique ability to print money.

What do they do in the land down under? “Where women glow, and men plunder?” To be fair, men (and women) plunder in America, too. It’s called Congress.

Australia has a two-tiered system, public and private. The public system provides universal care and is funded by a single payer, the government. It’s called Medicare, and is available for “Australian citizens and permanent residents.” No mention of covering illegals. A wide range of health services are provided, “at little or no cost and is funded by a combination of general revenue and the Medicare levy.” Meaning taxes. Specifically, 2 percent of taxable income with up to a 1.5 percent surcharge on high earners.

There is also a parallel and completely optional private system for those who don’t want care based on the dictates of the government. Private insurance in Australia provides choice, “If you, your partner or another family member becomes sick or injured, you can choose who treats you, when and where — putting you in control.” The opposite of their public option with the government in control. And quite unlike Obamacare.

Australian private insurance is market-based. Buy coverage for what you want and need, not what Obama and Pelosi say you need. “You can either select a pre-packaged hospital and extras bundle or mix ‘n’ match covers to create your own package – it’s up to you.” Wow, individual choice without government mandates and essential benefits. The 50-something single man doesn’t need to purchase maternity or pediatric insurance.

What else? “Your hospital excess is capped” meaning you won’t go bankrupt if you get really sick. “You can choose any provider you like” just as with Obamacare. Or not. When the Aussies say, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor” they mean it. Good on ya mate!

Back to the public option, the left’s holy grail of single-payer and universal coverage touted by Bernie Sanders. What’s the catch? It all seems logical, keeping the public and private systems separate, something for everyone. Pay your money and make your choice. But there are trade-offs.

Acknowledging the political and cultural reality that health care is an entitlement in America, despite all the free market and constitutional arguments that it is not. That ship sailed decades ago with the New Deal, Great Society and now Obamacare.

Coverage for preexisting conditions won’t go away. Eliminating this would never make it through Congress, even with Republicans in control. Instead, separate the two systems and let each do what they do best.

In Australia, the public option, Medicare, does cover everyone, but with a few caveats. You may not be the captain of your own ship. “Your general practitioner (GP) usually determines what medical treatment you need to manage your condition and symptoms.” Suppose your GP thinks she can treat you herself? Another Marcus Welby. Who needs a specialist?

If your GP believes you do need to see a specialist, he will send a letter to the local public hospital, which “will be reviewed and assessed by the hospital.” This all takes time, and is only the beginning of the wait. “If the referral is accepted, you will be put on an outpatient wait list to see a specialist.”

You will then fall into one of three categories for your specialist consultation or elective surgery. If urgent, you will be attended to within 30 days. Of being added to the wait list, not from when you first saw your GP. Semi-urgent conditions have a wait list of 90 days, and non-urgent problems wait up to 365 days.

These are recommendations. Your wait might be longer or shorter depending on how busy things are at the public hospital. The urgent breast lump might not be assessed for 30 days. The cataract keeping someone from reading or driving might not be removed for up to a year.

You will not make an appointment; you will be given an appointment, perhaps not on a day you prefer. Sure, you can change it, but that might mean going to the back of the line. You will also see the specialist they assign you to. You may not like your assigned doctor. Again, you can change but get back on line for a new appointment.

Not all bad as your care will be of high quality, comparable to other first world countries. But don’t expect that the latest and greatest new drug you see advertised on TV will be on formulary and available to you.  Your wallet will thank you. You won’t have to pay for your care, but you will have to wait for it. Perhaps a long time, and sometimes to the detriment of your health.

Despite the problems, your care won’t depend on your health or preexisting conditions. For the most part at least. A similar system in the U.K. bans smokers and the obese from routine surgery. And your care will not cost you anything. No copay. No deductible. No monthly premiums.

If you don’t like it, go private. Pay out of pocket or purchase insurance. Or use both systems depending on your needs and urgency.

Not a bad model for the U.S. Certainly better than the hodgepodge system we have now, the worst of public and private systems and the best of neither. A system no one is happy with, on the left or on the right. And little reason for hope based on the recently passed House bill.

Crikey mate! Maybe President Trump stumbled upon a good idea citing the merits of the Australian health care system.

Brian C. Joondeph is an ophthalmologist and can be reached on Twitter @retinaldoctor. This article originally appeared in the American Thinker.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

When science ceases to be value-neutral, science ceases to be science

May 22, 2017 Kevin 4
…
Next

Where money and the law intersect, truth can sometimes be the victim

May 23, 2017 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
When science ceases to be value-neutral, science ceases to be science
Next Post >
Where money and the law intersect, truth can sometimes be the victim

More by Brian C. Joondeph, MD

  • Ophthalmology in the era of COVID-19

    Brian C. Joondeph, MD
  • An ophthalmologist analyzes Joe Biden’s red eye

    Brian C. Joondeph, MD
  • When medical science becomes fake news

    Brian C. Joondeph, MD

Related Posts

  • It’s time we think about health care differently

    Praveen Suthrum
  • It’s time to study firearm morbidity and mortality as we do any other public health issue

    Charles Nozicka, DO
  • It is time for stewardship of our health insurance system

    Jenna Holmen, MD
  • Are negative news cycles and social media injurious to our health?

    Rabia Jalal, MD
  • It is time to make a dent in social determinants of health

    Joe Nicholson, DO
  • Low income is a neglected public health issue

    Vania Silva

More in Policy

  • The realities of immigrant health care served hot from America’s melting pot

    Stella Cho
  • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

    Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN
  • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

    Mohammed Umer Waris, MD
  • Breaking down the barriers to effective bar-code medication administration

    Amy Dang Craft
  • The locums industry has a beef problem

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD
  • Canada’s health workers are sounding the alarm. We must act, now.

    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds
    • How this doctor found her passion in ballroom dancing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Surviving and thriving after life’s most difficult moments

      Rebecca Fogg, MBA | Conditions
    • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 6 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Make the Diagnosis: This Bump on His Nose is a Tricky Diagnosis
  • CRT Regimen Boosts Complete Response Rate in Unresectable Vulvar Cancer
  • Fla. Doc Charged With Murder; McConnell Exits Rehab Facility; BPA on Store Receipts
  • FDA Faults Next-Gen Olympus Duodenoscopes
  • CDK4/6 Inhibition Active in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Meeting Coverage

  • CRT Regimen Boosts Complete Response Rate in Unresectable Vulvar Cancer
  • CDK4/6 Inhibition Active in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
  • Switch to IL-23 Blocker Yields Deep Responses in Recalcitrant Plaque Psoriasis
  • Biomarkers of Response With Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Cancer
  • At-Home Topical Therapy for Molluscum Contagiosum Gets High Marks
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • The endless waves of chronic illness

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Skydiving and surgery: How one doctor translates high-stress training to saving lives

      Alexandra Kharazi, MD | Physician
    • Telemedicine in the opioid crisis: a game-changer threatened by DEA regulations

      Julie Craig, MD | Meds
    • How this doctor found her passion in ballroom dancing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Surviving and thriving after life’s most difficult moments

      Rebecca Fogg, MBA | Conditions
    • Don’t be caught off guard: Read your malpractice policy today

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Laura Fortner, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

It’s time we look at the Australian health system for lessons
6 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...