Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Those in charge of EHRs are uninterested in cooperation. How sad.

Rocky Bilhartz, MD
Tech
August 10, 2015
79 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

Eleven billion dollars.

Sounds like a lot of money, doesn’t it?

It is. But, I’ll give you even more perspective, Tony Robbins style.

Eleven seconds ago you started reading this page. A few blinks of an eye. But, eleven million seconds? That was a few months back. 127 days to be exact. Can you remember what you were doing then? Eleven million seconds have passed since you did it.

But, when you jump to billions, you’ll begin to see my point. Take eleven billion seconds. How many days ago was that? Not days, really. Try years. I’ll give you a hint. You weren’t born yet. Our country wasn’t even born yet. Eleven billion seconds ago was almost 350 years in the past. It becomes days versus centuries when you go from millions to billions. They are solar systems apart, even when traveling at the speed of light.

So, back to eleven billion dollars.

Remember, as Everett Dirksen once said, “a billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.”

Eleven billion dollars is what the Veterans Health Administration (VA) is about to spend to revamp their electronic health record (EHR) system. That’s right. Computer software. For medicine.

These EHR upgrades will “speed health care delivery and save lives, as well as reduce health care costs, prevent medical errors, and avoid unnecessary testing,” says a retired U.S. Air Force general.

I can’t wait.

I’m sure the VA’s new EHR system will be better than all the others everyone else in health care is using right now. The others were also funded predominantly by American taxpayers, at the tune of nearly thirty billion dollars. And, as technology entrepreneur Jonathan Bush has said, it seems the federal government just bought “the very pre-Internet systems that all doctors and hospitals had already looked at and rejected.”

I guess that can happen when you artificially stimulate a market for the primary purpose of transmitting data to central authorities who may or may not understand anything about medicine. And, guess what? The federal government appears to be back shopping in this same market again.

Sure, we could have ended up with something similar for much cheaper by training monkeys to type on typewriters and email 80-page documents full of health care ciphers back-and-forth in the name of interoperability. But, trust me, the major cause of our current EHR failure isn’t that monkey. It’s our failure to collaborate with the individuals who possess the most knowledge about particular circumstances. Let me explain.

I work at a hospital owned by a Fortune 500 company. They have an EHR system. I believe it’s the same one for all 200 hospitals that they own.

In the last few years, I’ve submitted a number of requests to their main office. Mostly minor things for them to adjust or modify. Things that would make their EHR system better for the doctors, nurses, and pharmacists who use it. Things that would improve patient care, optimize health care efficiency, and lead to a safer environment for patients. Essentially, I’ve provided them with knowledge about time and place, knowledge about circumstances that actually relate to the delivery of medical care.

This isn’t about me, but just know that I’ve hardcoded applications for mobile devices. I’ve built websites. I understand a little bit about what can and cannot be done with information technology systems. And, I’ve sought to collaborate with bureaucracies time and time again to solve obvious problems at the ground level. I only wish that I could tell you about a time that they listened.

My story from this week is almost the same as all my others.

I enter medications for hospitalized patients by using an EHR. The purpose for a computer system is to limit errors related to drug dosing and administration, as well as check for adverse interactions that could result from multiple medications being prescribed together.

For three years, I’ve been trying to get an order template for a “heparin drip” to be added to the EHR system. For those who don’t work in health care, heparin is a medicine that prevents your blood from clotting. It is commonly used in my line of work, such as in the treatment of a heart attack.

Based upon one variable (the patient’s weight), two additional variables are calculated for the heparin drip protocol: 1) How many units of heparin are to be initially given; and, 2) how many units of heparin are to be infused every hour into a patient’s intravenous (IV) line to maintain appropriate levels.

To be fair, the protocol also includes monitoring the patient’s blood (by checking a blood test) at various hourly intervals, and then adjusting the infusion rate based upon the result. A grand total of about five steps or variables.

After waiting over three years for an answer regarding my request, I finally received an email from the central authority this week:

I spoke with … about the heparin drips. Right now there is no template for the titration of the drug, and there is so much information about how to adjust, that it might just be better to deal with that one on paper.

OK, so let me get this straight.

In 1945, we had a U.S.-built computer (known as the ENIAC) capable of solving five thousand arithmetic equations per second. In 2015, we need to take one inputed variable and calculate two others, and this evidently bogs the entire electronic system down so much that we better just deal with that one on paper? Unbelievable.

Do the people at the central authority even listen to their own chatter? In fact, their line of reasoning seems so absurd, I suspect that they are not even paying attention to their own words at all.

Rather, they just appear to be uninterested in any active cooperation. They seem content to continue ignoring knowledge about the particulars of time and place. They wish to march into battle as they always have, playing trumpets, and abiding by outdated rules of engagement. They miss the message that the generals on the battlefield have been trying to relay back home for sometime. The enemy is using gorilla warfare.

Yet, onward we go.

Bleeding billions.

Rocky Bilhartz is a cardiologist and the author of Finding Truth in Transparency: Our Broken Healthcare System and How We Can Heal It. He can be reached at BilhartzMD.com.

Prev

This is what a successful direct primary care practice looks like

August 10, 2015 Kevin 34
…
Next

Is solving the primary care crisis easier than we think?

August 10, 2015 Kevin 100
…

Tagged as: Health IT, Hospital-Based Medicine

Post navigation

< Previous Post
This is what a successful direct primary care practice looks like
Next Post >
Is solving the primary care crisis easier than we think?

More by Rocky Bilhartz, MD

  • No matter what Trump does to health care, we must accept an imperfect reality

    Rocky Bilhartz, MD
  • The interference in health care is mesmerizing

    Rocky Bilhartz, MD
  • Health care has far too many medical panels

    Rocky Bilhartz, MD

Related Posts

  • The public charge rule crosses the line, and doctors need to push back

    Susannah Hills, MD
  • No one is in charge of the free-for-all that is U.S. health care

    Steve Adelman, MD
  • America leads the world in high tech care and health care costs

    Mark Kelley, MD

More in Tech

  • The rise of generative AI in health care: Here’s what you need to know

    Anil Saldanha
  • Can AI solve the physician shortage crisis?

    Harry Severance, MD
  • Bridging the digital divide: How to bring trust back into the patient-physician relationship

    Arti Masturzo, MD
  • Can foundation AI models like ChatGPT and Google’s Bard be used for automating medical scribing?

    Dr. Sushindri Sridharan
  • ChatGPT: How generative AI is revolutionizing health care

    Robert Pearl, MD
  • The rise of chatbots for patient empowerment

    Harvey Castro, MD, MBA
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the stigma: Addressing the struggles of physicians

      Jean Antonucci, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of misery in medicine: a practical guide

      Paul R. Ehrmann, DO | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Unlock the power of physician compensation data in contract negotiations [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From pennies to attending salaries: Why physicians should teach their kids financial literacy

      Michele Cho-Dorado, MD | Finance
    • From solidarity to co-liberation: Understanding the journey towards ending oppression

      Maiysha Clairborne, MD | Physician
    • Changing the pediatric care landscape: Integrating behavioral and mental health care

      Hilary M. Bowers, MD | Conditions
    • Contract Diagnostics is the only firm 100 percent dedicated to physician contract reviews

      Contract Diagnostics | Sponsored
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 7 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Pregnant, Black? Here's Your Drug Test
  • Progestin-Only Birth Control Linked to Small Increase in Breast Cancer Risk
  • Fatty Acid Tube Feeding May Backfire for Preemie Breathing Disorder
  • Case Reports Detail Vision Loss Linked to Recalled Artificial Tears
  • Admin Trumps Med Students: Anti-Abortion Group Allowed on Campus

Meeting Coverage

  • Outlook for Itchy Prurigo Nodularis Continues to Improve With IL-31 Antagonist
  • AAAAI President Shares Highlights From the 2023 Meeting
  • Second-Line Sacituzumab Govitecan Promising in Platinum-Ineligible UC
  • Trial of Novel TYK2 Inhibitor Hits Its Endpoint in Plaque Psoriasis
  • Durable Vitiligo Responses With Topical Ruxolitinib
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • From physician to patient: one doctor’s journey to finding purpose after a devastating injury

      Stephanie Pearson, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the stigma: Addressing the struggles of physicians

      Jean Antonucci, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of misery in medicine: a practical guide

      Paul R. Ehrmann, DO | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • Why are doctors sued and politicians aren’t?

      Kellie Lease Stecher, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Unlock the power of physician compensation data in contract negotiations [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From pennies to attending salaries: Why physicians should teach their kids financial literacy

      Michele Cho-Dorado, MD | Finance
    • From solidarity to co-liberation: Understanding the journey towards ending oppression

      Maiysha Clairborne, MD | Physician
    • Changing the pediatric care landscape: Integrating behavioral and mental health care

      Hilary M. Bowers, MD | Conditions
    • Contract Diagnostics is the only firm 100 percent dedicated to physician contract reviews

      Contract Diagnostics | Sponsored
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Those in charge of EHRs are uninterested in cooperation. How sad.
7 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...