Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

After Halbig: What’s next for Obamacare?

Naomi Freundlich
Policy
August 11, 2014
216 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

After more than 40 attempts to pass legislation calling for repeal or significant changes to the health law, opponents of the Affordable Care Act have moved their focus from the House floor to the courthouse. Currently at least four lawsuits are working their way through state and district court — and one case awaits a nod from the Supreme Court — that would make it illegal for the federal government to provide premium subsidies to qualified consumers who buy Obamacare plans in 36 states that failed to set up their own exchanges. Depriving lower-and middle-income Americans of affordable healthcare is bad enough. But these lawsuits are just the latest weapon in the long-term quest to overturn the ACA — and hobble the Obama presidency — by any means necessary.

In fact, it is a strategy grounded in disruptive economics. As Jonathan Gruber, an MIT economist and chief architect of Massachusetts’ health reform law explains it, the Affordable Care Act is designed as a three-legged stool: The first “leg” is new rules that prevent insurers from hiking premiums or denying coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. The second “leg” is the individual mandate that requires all Americans to have health insurance. The third “leg” of the health law is the federal subsidies that make this insurance affordable to lower and middle-income people. Knock out one leg and the whole law becomes economically unfeasible.

Where are the potential weaknesses? The first leg of the stool is solid: There is bipartisan support for ending discriminatory practices in the insurance industry. The second leg is strengthened by the Supreme Court decision that found the individual mandate to be constitutional and enforceable. But the third leg — federal subsidies to help lower-income families and individuals pay for health coverage — is considered wobbly enough by conservatives to collapse with the right legal pressure. Their focus now is on the wording of a section of the Affordable Care Act that authorizes the federal subsidies. The law allows that tax subsidies may be available to qualified citizens who enroll in insurance plans “through an Exchange established by the State.”

This phrase, buried deep within the 2000 pages of the health law is the basis for at least four lawsuits charging that the ACA did not intend for premium subsidies to be legal in the 36 states relying on the federal government to run their exchanges. Although conservative groups like the Competitive Enterprise Institute are bankrolling these suits, plaintiffs include employers and individuals who claim that they are being “forced” to buy insurance even though their states failed to establish exchanges. On July 22, a three-judge panel from the District of Columbia’s appeals court ruled 2-1 in one such case — Halbig v. Burwell — that federal subsidies are illegal in the 36 states that rely on the federal exchange. “A federal exchange is not an ‘exchange established by the state,’” said Judge Thomas Griffith  who added, “We reach this conclusion, frankly, with reluctance,” considering the “significant consequences both for millions of individuals receiving tax credits and for health insurance markets more broadly.”

This reluctance is well founded. If the ruling stands, some 4.6 million people in 34 states would lose premium subsidies.  The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that if you include those who are eligible for subsidies in federal marketplace states but have not yet signed up, the ruling could potentially affect a total of 9.5 million uninsured individuals. Almost 90% of Americans who purchased insurance through the exchanges have received subsidies. Many of them — including a significant number of healthy, young people — would no longer be able to afford insurance. Since many of them live in the 24 states that also refused to expand Medicaid benefits, they would be exempt from the individual mandate and likely join the ranks of the uninsured. The Halbig decision would also invalidate the employer mandate in states using the federal marketplace, removing the requirement that employers pay penalties if they fail to provide affordable health insurance for their workers. According to Adrianna McIntyre at Vox,  “Halbig v. Burwell is arguably the Affordable Care Act’s greatest existential threat since the Supreme Court case decided in 2012.”

That threat is the tangible goal for conservatives like the Cato Institute’s Michael Cannon who see the Halbig decision as a victory for the majority of taxpayers. Cannon calls the federal subsidies “illegal,” writing in Forbes, “a victory for the Halbig plaintiffs would not increase anyone’s premiums. What it would do is prevent the IRS from shifting the burden of those premiums from enrollees to taxpayers. Premiums for federal-Exchange enrollees would not rise, but those enrollees would face the full cost of their ‘ObamaCare’ plans.”

If, in fact, enrollees did have to cover the “full cost of their ‘ObamaCare’ plans,” it’s easy to imagine a two-tier health care system where you either have to be wealthy or have good employer coverage to access what most of us consider essential benefits.

Fortunately, the federal subsidy issue is far from settled. On July 22 another appeals court in Virginia voted 3-0 to reject a second subsidy challenge, ruling in King v. Burwell that Congress did intend to offer subsidies nationwide regardless of whether consumers bought insurance on a state or federal exchange. Judge Roger Gregory, of the Virginia court, wrote that although the wording of the law was “ambiguous and subject to multiple interpretations,” the Congressional sponsors clearly intended that the ACA make affordable coverage accessible to all Americans. If the subsidies were not available on the federal exchanges, the “economic framework supporting the Act would crumble,” added Gregory, and millions of Americans would be uninsured.

What happens next? The Obama administration will likely ask all 11 judges on the D.C. Circuit Court to rehear the Halbig case — a so-called “en banc” review that could result in a ruling that validates federal subsidies in all states. Meanwhile, lawyers for the plaintiffs in the King v. Burwell case have already asked the Supreme Court to review their case in the current term, citing the “profound consequences” of the D.C. Circuit Court’s ruling:

If the ACA means what it says, as the D.C. Circuit held, the consequences are profound: It means millions of people are ineligible for subsidies and exempt from the ACA’s individual mandate penalty. It means hundreds of thousands of employers are free of the Act’s employer mandate. It means a fundamental change in the health insurance market in two-thirds of the country. And it means that the IRS is illegally spending billions of taxpayer dollars every month without congressional authority.

Besides these two high-profile cases, there are two other suits wending their way through the legal systems of Indiana and Oklahoma that could also end up in appellate courts. It is fair to say that the federal subsidies issue is having a moment — despite the fact that this was a non-issue throughout myriad Congressional hearings, years of policy debate and reams of analysis by pundits and reporters scouring the ACA for potential legislative pitfalls. To succeed, conservatives ultimately have to prove that the law’s creators intended to deny premium subsidies to people who live in states that rely on the federal exchange. As Brian Beutler writes in the New Republic, “Trying to take health insurance away from five million people on an admitted technicality doesn’t wear well. It wears much better if you pretend that’s what Obamacare’s creators wanted.”

If that deceit doesn’t fly, conservatives intent on dismantling the ACA can always fall back on an even more maddening Plan B; suing the president for “overstepping his authority” in his handling of the employer mandate and subverting the health law that way.

Naomi Freundlich is a journalist, policy expert and health advocate who blogs at Reforming Health.

Prev

Medical resident pay needs serious reform

August 11, 2014 Kevin 3
…
Next

7 ways patients can help reduce medication errors

August 11, 2014 Kevin 23
…

Tagged as: Obama, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Medical resident pay needs serious reform
Next Post >
7 ways patients can help reduce medication errors

More by Naomi Freundlich

  • We live in a culture of mental health haves and have nots

    Naomi Freundlich
  • Ignore Martin Shkreli. Focus on drug prices instead.

    Naomi Freundlich
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Workplace wellness programs: Are they really failures?

    Naomi Freundlich

More in Policy

  • Unveiling the global pandemic threat: insights into risk factors and urgent measures for prevention

    Ton La, Jr., MD, JD
  • Why the WHO’s pandemic accord is critical for global health care

    Elizabeth Métraux
  • The revolutionary Kaiser-Geisinger deal: How health care giants are reshaping the industry and empowering patients

    Robert Pearl, MD
  • Unveiling the intricate link between housing costs and health care

    Harvey Castro, MD, MBA
  • Uncovering the truth about racial health inequities in America: a book review

    John Paul Mikhaiel, MD
  • Why affirmative action is crucial for health equity and social justice in medicine

    Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Is chaos in health care leading us towards socialized medicine? How physician burnout is a catalyst.

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Boxing legends Tyson and Foreman: powerful lessons for a resilient and evolving health care future

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • A physician’s typical day, as envisioned by a non-clinician health care MBA: a satire

      Jennifer Lycette, MD | Physician
    • Revealing America’s expansion: the dark truth of Native American suffering and unjustified abuses

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The tragic story of Mr. G: a painful journey towards understanding suicide

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Decoding name displays in health care: Privacy, identification, and compliance unveiled

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • “Is your surgeon really skilled? The hidden threat to public safety in medicine.

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
    • Revolutionize your practice: the value-based care model that reduces physician burnout

      Chandravadan Patel, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of racism in health care: a call for anti-racist action

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Policy
    • Unveiling the hidden damage: the secretive world of medical boards

      Alan Lindemann, MD | Physician
    • An inspiring tribute to an exceptional radiologist who made a lasting impact

      Kim Downey, PT | Conditions
    • Proactive risk management: a game-changer in preventing physician burnout

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Discover your true north: Navigating life’s confusions and embracing your path to success

      Tyler Jorgensen, MD | Physician
    • A revolution in patient empowerment: Working together to save our medical system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Revealing America’s expansion: the dark truth of Native American suffering and unjustified abuses

      Anonymous | Physician
    • Unlock financial freedom: The physician’s guide to lucrative multifamily syndications and wealth accumulation

      Pranay Parikh, MD | Finance
    • From Moscow Mule to the opioid crisis: Unveiling the tragic legacy and urgent solutions

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Meds
    • From journalism to medicine: Unveiling the untold stories of patients’ medical conditions

      Veronica Bonales, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 8 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • New Antiviral Option for CMV Prophylaxis After Kidney Transplant
  • Infant RSV Vax Heads to FDA for Review
  • Is Getting Test Results Online Right Away a Good Idea? Yes, Patients Say
  • Residency Application System Cuts Section on Hobbies and Interests
  • Workplace Harassment, Cyber Incivility High for Minority Groups in Academic Medicine

Meeting Coverage

  • Phase II Study: Bispecific Oral Drug Tops Leading JAK Inhibitor for RA
  • Closing the Diversity Gaps in Urologic Oncology Leadership
  • Certain NSCLC Patients May Be Able to Stop Immunotherapy at 2 Years
  • No Survival Benefit With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in Metastatic RCC
  • Happy Sleep, Happy Couple?
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Is chaos in health care leading us towards socialized medicine? How physician burnout is a catalyst.

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Boxing legends Tyson and Foreman: powerful lessons for a resilient and evolving health care future

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • A physician’s typical day, as envisioned by a non-clinician health care MBA: a satire

      Jennifer Lycette, MD | Physician
    • Revealing America’s expansion: the dark truth of Native American suffering and unjustified abuses

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The tragic story of Mr. G: a painful journey towards understanding suicide

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Decoding name displays in health care: Privacy, identification, and compliance unveiled

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • “Is your surgeon really skilled? The hidden threat to public safety in medicine.

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
    • Revolutionize your practice: the value-based care model that reduces physician burnout

      Chandravadan Patel, MD | Physician
    • Breaking the cycle of racism in health care: a call for anti-racist action

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Policy
    • Unveiling the hidden damage: the secretive world of medical boards

      Alan Lindemann, MD | Physician
    • An inspiring tribute to an exceptional radiologist who made a lasting impact

      Kim Downey, PT | Conditions
    • Proactive risk management: a game-changer in preventing physician burnout

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Discover your true north: Navigating life’s confusions and embracing your path to success

      Tyler Jorgensen, MD | Physician
    • A revolution in patient empowerment: Working together to save our medical system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Revealing America’s expansion: the dark truth of Native American suffering and unjustified abuses

      Anonymous | Physician
    • Unlock financial freedom: The physician’s guide to lucrative multifamily syndications and wealth accumulation

      Pranay Parikh, MD | Finance
    • From Moscow Mule to the opioid crisis: Unveiling the tragic legacy and urgent solutions

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Meds
    • From journalism to medicine: Unveiling the untold stories of patients’ medical conditions

      Veronica Bonales, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

After Halbig: What’s next for Obamacare?
8 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...