Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Emergency physicians are blamed for a broken health system

BirdStrike, MD
Physician
June 25, 2014
227 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

In an article entitled, ”Why the ER admits too many patients,” Dr. Michael Kirsch tries to explain that emergency department admissions are inflated due to emergency physicians acting in their own self-interest.  Many emergency physicians have read this and taken offense, feeling that his assertions point unfair blame on them for a significant portion of excesses in medical care and costs.  I share this visceral reaction in part, but such a reaction blurs some very important points worth examining.  Let’s give the benefit of the doubt for a moment, that the author may in fact be pointing the blame not at emergency physicians personally, but at a broken system instead.

First, he claims that due to fears of potential lawsuits, emergency physicians when in doubt, cautiously err on the side of admitting a patient and ordering tests, rather than discharging them with minimal work up.  How any emergency physician can deny that this happens baffles me, as almost every one I’ve ever known will say in private they think about, and are motivated to avoid the threat of lawsuits (except for possibly a few in the handful of states with strong tort reform).  Physician surveys seem to support this, with at least one showing greater than 90% of physicians across multiple specialties admitting to such.  This speaks to the greater issue of defensive medicine and the need for tort reform, and should not be seen as an indictment of emergency physicians.  Tort reform is an issue where the American people just plain need to decide.  Do they want to keep their cake uncut, or to eat it?  You absolutely cannot cling to the pipe dream of reducing unnecessary medical testing and expensive overly-cautious admissions while holding true to the good old-fashioned American past time of suing the pants off of a doctor who sends a patient home, only to have something unexpected go wrong.

Do you want:

  1. Doctors to send you home, cancel your test, and throw caution to the wind when you might be sick to save costs for the greater system, and give up the right to sue if something goes wrong.
  2. Or do you want to retain the right to sue in court for hundreds of thousands of dollars (or even millions) if you have a bad outcome and have doctors admit you when in doubt and order every test (expensive or not) that they think they need to keep that from happening?

You cannot have both.   For the most part, and in most states in the land, the American people, their elected politicians and the plaintiff’s attorneys that support them, have already decided in favor of option 2.  The right to sue has always come out on top (in most states) and there’s no sign that’s about to change any time soon.  To those who will respond with “science,” “data” and articles claiming the threat of medical malpractice doesn’t alter doctors’ practices or inflate health care costs, don’t bother.  Most physicians are not interested in hearing evidence or data to show oxygen isn’t needed for breathing, or that 2+2 isn’t 4, either.

There are some things we as doctors know to be self-evident.  To the extent that one blames such a drive to err on the side of admitting patients on a dysfunctional medical malpractice system, is the extent to which he is correct.  To the extent one points the finger specifically at emergency physicians, who have no choice in this day and age but to admit patients with the utmost of caution when in doubt, is the extent to which he is certainly wrong.

Secondly, it is claimed that doctors may be pressured by their hospital to admit patients to make more money.  But for whom?  There is nothing that personally profits an emergency physician by choosing to admit a patient over discharging one.  Whether a patient is admitted or not, doesn’t change the physician fee, or level of service billed, at all.  It’s simply not part of the criteria.  It certainly may make a difference to a hospital administrator’s bottom line, which could lead a hospital to threaten a physician’s job over not admitting enough patients, or to provide improper and unwelcome pressure to do the same.  At least one pair of emergency physicians have alleged exactly this, filing suit saying their “hospitals … offered them illegal kickbacks to order unnecessary tests and admit more patients to increase corporate revenues.”

Is this an isolated case, and a fluke?  Or are these the only two amongst many physicians that were either brave enough or fed up enough, to blow the whistle?  Could this be the tip of an iceberg pointing towards a growing trend?

My suspicion is that as the current trend of hospitals buying physician practices and employing physicians directly to co-monopolizing the health care system along with the government and insurance industry, that such instances will become more common.  Either way, none this personally benefits an emergency physician.  In fact, such pressures are toxic towards physician morale and are on the list of things that lead many physicians to steer young people away from becoming physicians.  Emergency physicians only make more money by either, working more hours or seeing more patients.  Otherwise, they suffer (along with more importantly, their patients) from being caught in the middle of the rest of these twisted pressures and motivations imposed by others.  This needs to be made 100% clear.

The author goes on to assert, that unnecessary admissions would be stopped suddenly and dramatically, if we could just tweak the system such that “hospitals are penalized financially for hospitalizing folks who should have been sent home,” and then “we will witness the miracle of a runaway train performing a U-turn on the tracks.”  Where is the proof, that this would do anything more than just add another layer of distorted pressures and motivations, twisting the vice tighter on emergency physicians, with the sword of frivolous medical malpractice accusations on one side if a sick patient is sent home, and on the other side, the hot iron of threats from profit-conscious hospital administrators facing the threat of financial penalties if too many patients are admitted?

This seems to me, that opposed to having “miraculous” results, it would do nothing more than add another layer of unintended consequences to an already twisted storm of conflicts of interests, distracting physicians from making the best decisions for their patients based on their medical knowledge, judgment, textbooks and training.

In conclusion, the author of this article brings up some very good issues and concerns.  It is unclear the extent to which he points the blame specifically at emergency physicians themselves. To the extent that he does so, I disagree vehemently.  It is my suspicion however, that he points the blame more at our system with its perverse pressures, as evidenced by his comment, “If I were an ER physician, I would behave similarly facing the same pressures that they do.”

Emergency physicians are a lighting rod at the center of a broken storm of a system, and suffer from it much (second only to the patients), with little to gain from its perverse pressures and coercions.  Under the current conditions I would say they do the most with the least, and as a group, do a phenomenal job in the unenviable, overwhelming and thankless circumstances they frequently find themselves.  Perhaps by understanding and acknowledging this, physicians between specialties, patients and policy makers can find common ground to battle the threats distorting, twisting and re-defining our profession and our patients’ care.

“BirdStrike” is an emergency physician who blogs at Dr. Whitecoat.

Prev

What if homeopathy invaded the ER?  This.

June 25, 2014 Kevin 1
…
Next

Young children are silenced by psychiatric medication

June 26, 2014 Kevin 3
…

Tagged as: Emergency Medicine

Post navigation

< Previous Post
What if homeopathy invaded the ER?  This.
Next Post >
Young children are silenced by psychiatric medication

More by BirdStrike, MD

  • After a drowning: An impossible question a doctor faces

    BirdStrike, MD
  • To the doctors who have lost patients. This is for you.

    BirdStrike, MD
  • Even if no life was saved, an ER physician makes a difference

    BirdStrike, MD

More in Physician

  • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

    Kevin Haselhorst, MD
  • The hidden truths of hospital life: What doctors wish you knew

    Emily Stanford, DO
  • The heart of a Desi doctor: Balancing emotions and resources in oncology

    Dr. Damane Zehra
  • The Iranian diaspora’s fight for liberty: Overcoming challenges in the largest women’s rights movement of our century

    Montreh Tavakkoli, MD
  • The harmful effects of shaming patients for self-education

    Maryanna Barrett, MD
  • The power of self-appreciation: Why physicians need to start acknowledging their own contributions

    Wendy Schofer, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
    • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
    • The hidden truths of hospital life: What doctors wish you knew

      Emily Stanford, DO | Physician
    • 10 commandments of ethical affiliate marketing for physicians

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Amy Bissada, DO | Finance
    • The heart of a Desi doctor: Balancing emotions and resources in oncology

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
    • Safe sex for seniors: Dispelling myths and embracing safe practices [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Overcoming Parkinson’s: a journey of laughter and resilience

      Cynthia Poire Mathews, FNP | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • A 'Double Whammy' for Gastric Cancer Risk
  • Transcatheter Arterialization of Deep Veins Succeeds for No-Option Limb Ischemia
  • Vedolizumab Proves Its Worth in Treating Chronic Pouchitis
  • French Data Reassure on Bivalent COVID Booster and Stroke Risk
  • Common Enzyme Deficiency Linked With COVID Severity

Meeting Coverage

  • Oral Roflumilast Effective in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis
  • Phase III Trials 'Hit a Home Run' in Advanced Endometrial Cancer
  • Cannabis Use Common in Post-Surgery Patients on Opioid Tapering
  • Less Abuse With Extended-Release Oxycodone, Poison Center Data Suggest
  • Novel Strategies Show Winning Potential in Ovarian Cancer
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • What is driving physicians to the edge of despair?

      Edward T. Creagan, MD | Physician
    • The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors

      Denise Reich | Conditions
    • The psychoanalytic hammer: lessons in listening and patient-centered care

      Greg Smith, MD | Conditions
    • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • It’s time for C-suite to contract directly with physicians for part-time work

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Tom Brady’s legacy and the importance of personal integrity in end-of-life choices

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
    • The hidden truths of hospital life: What doctors wish you knew

      Emily Stanford, DO | Physician
    • 10 commandments of ethical affiliate marketing for physicians

      Aaron Morgenstein, MD & Amy Bissada, DO | Finance
    • The heart of a Desi doctor: Balancing emotions and resources in oncology

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
    • Safe sex for seniors: Dispelling myths and embracing safe practices [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Overcoming Parkinson’s: a journey of laughter and resilience

      Cynthia Poire Mathews, FNP | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Emergency physicians are blamed for a broken health system
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...