Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Chief Justice Roberts’ health reform ruling analysis: A win-win?

David B. Nash, MD, MBA
Policy
August 18, 2012
226 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

The decision is in – and it is likely to have a substantial impact on this year’s elections, the Congress, the Court, the healthcare industry, and all Americans.

Of all the commentary I’ve read in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision, Time Magazine‘s “Special Report: The Health Care Decision” struck me as the most balanced and comprehensive.

In the lead article, “Roberts Rules,” author David Von Drehle skillfully dissected the legal gymnastics that turned a potential zero-sum game into a win-win situation.

The controversies will persist, but two things are certain:

  1. Healthcare reform as formulated in the hotly debated Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) is constitutional, and
  2. Congress cannot force states to adopt the Medicaid expansion provision, a key element in attaining the goal of universal coverage.

There is now not a single doubt that Chief Justice Roberts does indeed rule.

Sharp as the horns were on this dilemma, Roberts was sharper — and, whatever one’s political leaning, his performance was sheer artistry!

His interpretation of the law allowed liberals to realize their long sought (and fought-for) dream of government-led reform and simultaneously aided conservatives in their quest for limits on congressional power over states.

Here is how it went down: Roberts began by stating that the conservative position on the “individual mandate” was indeed correct – i.e., the Constitution does not give Congress the power to require citizens to buy health insurance if they don’t want it.

Predictably, this part of the ruling was supported by the four Republican appointees on the Court.

Roberts went on to say that Congress is empowered by the Constitution to levy taxes and that the mandate is, in essence, a tax on citizens who decide not to buy health insurance.

Just as predictably, the Democratic appointees sided with Roberts on this part of the ruling. Neither side got exactly what it wanted, but both “won” something.

The 5-4 split was not unusual, but the fact that the Chief Justice took the reins rather than the perennial swing voter, Anthony Kennedy, made jaws drop across the country.

From a political standpoint, Roberts’ ruling guarded the Court against charges of partisanship while protecting Obama from accusations that he wasted the first year of his term “fiddling over an unconstitutional overreach” while the economy was burning.

I particularly liked Von Drehle’s keen observation that what Roberts managed to do with the ACA “vindicated the virtue of compromise in an era of Occupiers, Tea Partyers, and litmus-testing special interests” and positioned him above the “toxic cloud of partisan rancor.”

One question that remains is why Roberts decided to take the lead.

Von Drehle consulted John Q. Barrett, professor of law at St. John’s University, who saw it as a classic example of a cautious Chief Justice who feels that “for public credibility and independence of the court, major legislation should not be struck down by a 5-4 vote on the grounds that Congress lacks the power.”

In this context, “cautious” was far from wimpy!

In fact, the limits the decision imposes on Congress’ power to regulate commerce and use its spending power to coerce states will undoubtedly spur conservatives to pursue even greater limitations.

So, was it a “sober compromise” or a “clever ruse” to facilitate the conservative agenda?

Barrett pointed out that the relatively young Chief Justice might not have wanted his tenure to be defined in terms of the opposite ruling, which would have been a “permanently controversial landmark.”

For the time being, only Justice Roberts knows — but the answer will surely become obvious to all of us over the next few years.

David B. Nash is Founding Dean of the Jefferson School of Population Health at Thomas Jefferson University and blogs at Nash on Health Policy.

Prev

The largest health care fraud settlement in history: Is it big enough?

August 18, 2012 Kevin 4
…
Next

Put patients to work during their wait time

August 18, 2012 Kevin 8
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The largest health care fraud settlement in history: Is it big enough?
Next Post >
Put patients to work during their wait time

More by David B. Nash, MD, MBA

  • Does the House of God stand the test of time?

    David B. Nash, MD, MBA
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Nonprofit hospitals: The potential for conflict of interest is huge

    David B. Nash, MD, MBA
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Quality measures benefit from quality improvement

    David B. Nash, MD, MBA

More in Policy

  • The realities of immigrant health care served hot from America’s melting pot

    Stella Cho
  • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

    Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN
  • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

    Mohammed Umer Waris, MD
  • Breaking down the barriers to effective bar-code medication administration

    Amy Dang Craft
  • The locums industry has a beef problem

    Aaron Morgenstein, MD
  • Canada’s health workers are sounding the alarm. We must act, now.

    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Breaking the stigma: Addressing the struggles of physicians

      Jean Antonucci, MD | Physician
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why it’s time to question medical traditions [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden gems of health care: Unlocking the potential of narrative medicine

      Dr. Najat Fadlallah | Physician
    • The realities of immigrant health care served hot from America’s melting pot

      Stella Cho | Policy
    • The dark side of immortality: What if we could live forever?

      Ketan Desai, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Lazarus: the dead man brought back to life

      William Lynes, MD | Conditions
    • Revolutionizing COPD management with virtual care solutions [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 4 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

CME Spotlights

From MedPage Today

Latest News

  • Doc Moms, Mind the Gap -- $3M Earning Difference by Sex
  • Clinical Note Writing App Powered by GPT-4 Set to Debut This Year
  • Helping Patients Get Fit -- One Walk at a Time
  • TB Cases Rebound to Near Pre-Pandemic Levels, CDC Data Show
  • Marginalized Groups May Benefit More From Decreasing Air Pollution

Meeting Coverage

  • Switch to IL-23 Blocker Yields Deep Responses in Recalcitrant Plaque Psoriasis
  • Biomarkers of Response With Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Cancer
  • At-Home Topical Therapy for Molluscum Contagiosum Gets High Marks
  • Outlook for Itchy Prurigo Nodularis Continues to Improve With IL-31 Antagonist
  • AAAAI President Shares Highlights From the 2023 Meeting
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Healing the damaged nurse-physician dynamic

      Angel J. Mena, MD and Ali Morin, MSN, RN | Policy
    • The struggle to fill emergency medicine residency spots: Exploring the factors behind the unfilled match

      Katrina Gipson, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Breaking the stigma: Addressing the struggles of physicians

      Jean Antonucci, MD | Physician
    • Beyond the disease: the power of empathy in health care

      Nana Dadzie Ghansah, MD | Physician
    • Deaths of despair: an urgent call for a collective response to the crisis in U.S. life expectancy

      Mohammed Umer Waris, MD | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • The hidden dangers of the Nebraska Heartbeat Act

      Meghan Sheehan, MD | Policy
    • The real cause of America’s opioid crisis: Doctors are not to blame

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Nobody wants this job. Should physicians stick around?

      Katie Klingberg, MD | Physician
    • The fight for reproductive health: Why medication abortion matters

      Catherine Hennessey, MD | Physician
    • The vital importance of climate change education in medical schools

      Helen Kim, MD | Policy
    • Resetting the doctor-patient relationship: Navigating the challenges of modern primary care

      Jeffrey H. Millstein, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why it’s time to question medical traditions [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden gems of health care: Unlocking the potential of narrative medicine

      Dr. Najat Fadlallah | Physician
    • The realities of immigrant health care served hot from America’s melting pot

      Stella Cho | Policy
    • The dark side of immortality: What if we could live forever?

      Ketan Desai, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Lazarus: the dead man brought back to life

      William Lynes, MD | Conditions
    • Revolutionizing COPD management with virtual care solutions [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today iMedicalApps
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Chief Justice Roberts’ health reform ruling analysis: A win-win?
4 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...