Understanding the uproar over Zohydro ER

In March 2014, Zohydro ER (hydrocodone extended-release) was introduced to the market. Never in my medical lifetime do I recall a medication stirring such angst. Worries of mass overdoses, backdoor FDA conspiracies, and blatant disregard for the public well-being abound. Is there method to this madness?

Zohydro ER is a pain pill that, when taken by mouth, is released slowly over twelve hours. The active ingredient, hydrocodone, is an opioid (i.e. narcotic) that’s been around for decades in a short-acting pill form (e.g. Lortab, Vicodin, Norco) and has historically been combined with APAP (a.k.a. acetaminophen, Tylenol).  The FDA considers hydrocodone-APAP combination pills to be relatively less addictive and designates them as a schedule 3 drug. Physicians can prescribe schedule 3 drugs over the phone, with up to six refills. By contrast, schedule 2 drugs (e.g. morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone), even when combined with APAP, are considered more addictive, can’t be called in, and can’t be refilled without a new hard copy prescription.

Because it is effective for pain, relatively well tolerated, and convenient to prescribe, hydrocodone-APAP pills have become the most commonly prescribed opioid in the United States.  It’s therefore not surprising that, since there’s so much in circulation, hydrocodone-APAP pills are frequently the most available opioid for abusers to abuse.  Add to this the legitimate worry about acetaminophen (APAP) overuse causing liver failure, and you can understand our leaders’ concerns surrounding this pain medication.

Enter Zohydro ER, the first extended-release hydrocodone pill without APAP. It’s easy on the liver and lasts twelve hours; so people with around-the-clock pain may need fewer pills per day. Additionally, it’s a schedule 2 drug. In summary, Zohydro ER is a long-lasting version of a widely used and effective opioid, which until now had only been available in combination with acetaminophen.  So why the controversy?

Zohydro ER does not have any of the new and popular tamper-resistant technologies; e.g. a matrix that won’t dissolve easily, or a coating that is difficult to crush.  Instead, the makers took advantage of a delivery system (SODAS) already used successfully in a number other of extended-release drugs such as: Ritalin LA, Focalin XR, Luvox CR, and Avinza.

Oxycontin and Opana ER are two examples of opioids that manufacturers took off the market briefly for reformulation as tamper-resistant.  However, while the changes have made them more difficult to snort or inject, many addicts still find ways to abuse these drugs or have just moved on to heroin. Tamper-resistant does not mean tamper-proof.

By the way, the generic form of Opana ER (oxymorphone extended-release) was not reformulated and is still available without tamper-resistant technology. Also, consider that Avinza (morphine extended-release), which employs the same sustained-release system (SODAS) as Zohydro ER, has neither been recalled nor been required to undergo reformulation.  In reality, probably 90% of the opioids in circulation do not have tamper-resistant formulations.

That’s why I have difficulty understanding the uproar over Zohydro ER. As a pain specialist, I welcome another effective treatment to offer chronic pain sufferers. Sure, I’d be happier if it had a hard coating or some other “deterrent” to abuse. But in reality, Zohydro ER is, for all practical purposes, neither safer nor more dangerous than many of the drugs I already prescribe with success. So far, tamper-resistant innovations have not been proven to be effective in the big scheme of things. All opioids, regardless of the formulation, must be prescribed with caution and careful monitoring.

According to the American Society of Addiction Medicine, there are four main factors that contribute to a drug being addictive:

  1. How much will it cost me?  All things considered equal, people will choose a drug that is cheaper.
  2. How fast does it get to my brain? Hydrocodone is water-soluble and actually diffuses into the brain slower than many other opioids.
  3. What kind of a buzz will I get? Opioids stimulate the brain’s “reward circuit.” There is no proof that hydrocodone is any worse in this regard than other opioids.
  4. How much of it can I get my hands on? People will abuse what is available to them. Since hydrocodone is the most prescribed opioid, expect it to be one of the most abused. It follows that if Zohydro ER floods the market it will be abused.

Therefore, my recommendations to physicians are:

  1. Prescribe Zohydro ER in the lowest dose possible, for the shortest duration of time, and only if the benefits outweigh the risks.
  2. Monitor regularly for effectiveness, side effects, and patient compliance.
  3. Educate yourself and your patient.
  4. Follow guidelines and regulations faithfully.

By the way, that’s my advice to physicians regardless of which opioid they prescribe.

Zohydro ER may not be tamper-resistant, but tamper-resistant drugs are not super heroes. Do not expect them to save us from the real villain.

The real villain is not the FDA, not the drug company, not the drug, and not the patient.

The villain is the disease of addiction.

Focus on the disease. Prevent the disease. Treat the disease.

This Zohydro hullabaloo is a prime opportunity to shine light on the problems surrounding prescription drug abuse and addiction. Let’s take advantage of it.

And stop the madness.

James Patrick Murphy is a physician who blogs at The Painful Truth. He can be reached on Twitter @jamespmurphymd.

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

  • Mark Pugner

    The fact that all of this “controcersy” looks more like a native advertising campaign seems to be missed by most in the health professions, instead they look dumbfounded by the controversy and unable to understand it. Of course this has been discussed extensively on the no agenda show. Google it.

  • Gibbon1

    I have my thoughts on ‘tamper resistant’ opiates. All of these ‘work’ by trying to harm or kill addicts. That’s kind of immoral.

    And at my age, and being a not very judgmental person I know a number of former addicts. They eventually won the battle against the monkey on their back. Would have been shame if they’d died, because drug manufacturers put poison in the meds.

  • sdurham1979

    The villain to me is undiagnosed fatigue, mood issues, and causes of pain. Patients get addicted because it makes them feel better. Why explore a root cause if you can self mediate and feel great? Improve communication, refer to specialists, and run tests. Don’t run a CBC or an old school x-ray and tell the patient nothing is wrong. You didn’t do enough to come to that conclusion!

    The media hype drives this Zohydro panic. If opiate abuse wasn’t covered more than war, no one would know otherwise. Addicts will find a way to get their high. Restricting opiate prescriptions is only leading to increased heroine use. It’s cheaper and easier to get in most areas. See where the mass hysteria is leading us? I am shocked that it was approved without tamper resistance in place. But, I shouldn’t be. Money is the big issue at hand. Why the government continues to fight medical marijuana is a mystery. Until you realize it can be grown in your window seal instead of a lab.

    • J Rizzo

      The case can be made that Heroin wouldn’t be so popular right now if prescription opiates weren’t so readily available. Sometimes I wonder if cartels aren’t buying off the FDA because in the long run they are the ones who win. Zohydro=OD=Media frenzy (which is rightly occurring now)=FDA finally doing it’s job=cartels setting up shop in your suburban neighborhood when the new batch of working class opiate addicts needs their fix! There is nothing understated in the media about the dangers of Zohydro. This drug should not have come to the market.

  • Patient Kit

    Apparently, there a plans afoot to ban the sale of ZohydroER in Massachusetts.