The intense world paradigm for understanding autism

Henry Markram is one of the world’s leading neuroscientists.  After a brilliant career of influential research, he has been charged with leading Europe’s Human Brain Project, a $1.3 billion project that aims to build a supercomputer model of the brain.  But Markram is also the father of a boy with autism.  And that has changed everything.

Maia Szalavitz’s poignant article The Boy Whose Brain Could Unlock Autism chronicles Markram’s personal and scientific journey.  From a very early age, his son Kai displayed a variety of unusual behaviors.

“When his parents tried to set limits, there were tantrums — not just the usual kicking and screaming, but biting and spitting, with a disproportionate and uncontrollable ferocity; and not just at age two, but at three, four, five and beyond … Preventing Kai from harming himself by running into the street or following other capricious impulses was a constant challenge. Even just trying to go to the movies became an ordeal: Kai would refuse to enter the cinema or hold his hands tightly over his ears.”

When his son received the diagnosis of autism, Markram read “every study and book he could get his hands on.”  As a visiting professor at the University of California San Francisco, he encountered Michael Merzenich, a neuroscientist who “proposed that autism is caused by an imbalance between inhibitory and excitatory neurons.”

Propelled by this theory, Markram’s lab began studying rats that had been induced to display autism-like behaviors.  To the researchers’ surprise, the excitatory networks of these rats’ brains were hyperactive.  Their brain cells “responded nearly twice as strongly as normal — and they were hyper-connected. If a normal cell had connections to ten other cells, the cell of (autistic rats) connected with twenty.”

They also noted that these rats displayed “high levels of anxiety as compared to normal rats … They were quicker to get frightened, and faster at learning what to fear, but slower to discover that a once-threatening situation was now safe.” The problem with these rats was not that they couldn’t learn.  It was that “they learn too quickly, with too much fear, and irreversibly.”

Based on these findings, Markram developed what he calls the “intense world” model of autism.  He and his fellow researchers hypothesize that autistic behaviors are caused by being overwhelmed by information from the world.  To grasp this idea,

Imagine being world into a world of bewildering, inescapable sensory overload, like a visitor from a much darker, calmer, quieter planet. Your mother’s eyes: a strobe light. Your father’s voice: a growling jackhammer. That cute little onesie everyone thinks is so soft? Sandpaper with diamond grit. And what about all that cooing and affection? A barrage of chaotic, indecipherable input, a cacophony of raw, unfilterable data.

Just to survive, you’d need to be excellent at detecting any pattern you could find in the frightful and oppressive noise. To stay sane, you’d have to control as much as possible, developing a rigid focus on detail, routine and repetition. Systems in which specific inputs produce predictable outputs would be far more attractive than human beings, with their mystifying and inconsistent demands and their haphazard behavior.

This is what Markram believes it is like to be autistic: “Unlike adults, however, babies can’t flee. All they can do is cry and rock, and, later, try to avoid touch, eye contact, and other powerful experiences. Autistic children might revel in patterns and predictability just to make sense of the chaos.”

According to the article, this “intense world” paradigm for understanding autism has been met with some caution and criticism by experts in the field.  Nonetheless, it helps makes sense of what I see in my son with autism.  Indeed, it speaks to my own compulsion to sometimes want to escape from the world in order to process what I’ve experienced.  I wonder if more introverted people have hyperactive brain networks.  Does an onslaught of information from outside compel them to be alone with their thoughts more often?

James Marroquin is an internal medicine physician who blogs at his self-titled site, James Marroquin.

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

  • Celia Cortner

    Fascinating. I have two nephews with autism, one is high functioning and the other is severely impacted. In my own nuclear family both myself and my daughter are highly introverted people who often feel after being out in the world that we are “peopled out” as we say and we need to withdraw from all the stimulus. She had a very difficult youth being unable to handle change, stress, or disruption to routine. As an adult she has come to understand herself better, but still finds life to be extremely overstimulating, at times overwhelming, and her most frequent response is anger. I do believe that there are many of us who are borderline in these areas of the brain and stimulation and we have found ways to adapt, some for the better, and some not so well.

    • jimmyquin

      Thanks, Celia. As the recent discussion of DSM in the world of psychiatry shows, the diagnoses we base on the behavior we observe are human constructs rather than sharply defined real entities. They are helpful for helping us communicate about and research psychiatric conditions. However, in reality, there is overlap among psychiatric diagnoses and many of their defining traits (such as the need to withdraw into routine in autism) are also present in many of us without formal diagnoses. The difference is the extremity of the traits–in many people with psychiatric diagnoses the traits impair individuals’ ability to function. But, properly channeled and managed, these traits can be real strengths, something Temple Grandin has eloquently articulated and demonstrated.

  • jimmyquin

    Thanks, satetygoal.

Most Popular