We need to use smart cards for our health

Pierre arrives at the construction site, has his morning coffee and croissant, then ascends the scaffold to begin his work.  He felt a little woozy this morning but ignored it.  Becoming more dizzy, he loses his balance and falls two stories fracturing his femur and pelvis.  On arrival the paramedics find his health smart card in his wallet, scan it, and instantly have his medical records including medications, allergies and importantly prior EKG’s.  He’s found to have a new rapid irregular heart rate and given appropriate medical treatment on the way to the ER.  Pierre is lucky he lives in France where smart card technology is widely applied.

Billy has severe COPD and is on multiple medications.  Going out to pick up the morning paper, he trips, falls, becomes confused and can’t respond logically to questions from a bystander.  911 is called and arrives.  No family members are present.  No medical information is available.  He’s transported to the hospital where it takes 30 minutes to track down a partial medical history and an advance directive.  Billy is unfortunate he lives in a state not using smart card technology.

The smart card has been around for a few decades and is in wide use in Germany, France, Taiwan and several other countries.  Biometrics and other security measures have been developed to comply with patient privacy regulations.  The VA  is using a smart card system successfully.  Other health smart card companies have begun to compete for this potentially large market.

There are state wide and even nation wide efforts to have registries for advance directives and POLST forms in order to make them available on an emergent basis.  But we are a mobile society. Individual state registries become redundant, expensive, and hard to maintain.  Oregon has the most advanced state registry but that is just one state.  Smart cards will allow each one of us to carry around our own health care information in our wallet or purse.  Privacy can be protected with use of a thumbprint.  Secure readers can be portable.

The lack of wide use of smart cards in the US health care delivery is one more symptom of a broken and dysfunctional non-system.

Jim deMaine is a pulmonary physician who blogs at End of Life – thoughts from an MD.

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

  • John Trader

    Great article Dr. deMaine, thanks for writing this. It is definitely worthwhile to expand the use of smart cards and biometrics for more accurate patient identification in healthcare in the U.S. based on the success of other countries. It should be noted however, that smart cards require a patient to carry something, and can also be shared between patients or lost and need to be replaced whereas biometrics can’t and offers a different set of benefits.

    It will be interesting to see the continued evolution of biometrics and smart cards for patient ID as more healthcare facilities start to realize the benefits. Thanks again for writing the article!

  • militarymedical

    Bravo!

Most Popular