Is outsourcing medical diagnoses a good idea?

I’m sure that many of you have read the New York Times post  titled “Job Prospects are Dimming for Radiology Trainees.”

I don’t know about you, but this article made me feel more than ever that in order to choose the right specialty, you have to predict the future of the field. Don’t choose a field that’s going to be heavily affected by Medicare cuts, some say. Fields that are lucrative now may not be by the time we’re done training, others point out. The field of neurology is already lobbying heavily this year due to a projected 7% decrease in payments. But who really knows how to look into the murky crystal ball, what with Medicare cuts and expansion in primary care, not to mention physician lobbying, and come out with a clearer picture of what’s to come?

In a nutshell, the article describes how St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx gave its radiology residents a one-year termination notice because the hospital is replacing their radiology department with a teleradiology company. From the hospital’s perspective, this makes sense. It is cheaper, they will get readings done faster and more efficiently, and they can funnel the money they save from cutting radiology training to increase primary care residencies. But from an educational perspective, this is devastating for the future generation of radiologists.

The article highlighted the options that several of these radiology trainees are now facing. These residents already have MDs, are halfway through radiology residency training, and are now left with nowhere to go. They are offering to work for free to finish residency and have to turn to donations from family and friends to work in unpaid programs.

The article definitely gave me pause. But there are few things to think about here before we all throw in the towel. First, the radiology program at St. Barnabas Hospital is affiliated with New York College of Osteopathic Medicine, not an allopathic institution. I haven’t heard of any radiology programs at allopathic institutions being closed, and I think this distinction may have influenced the decision to choose teleradiology over residents.

Often a little clinical context goes a long way.

A second point I worry about is quality of teleradiology, which may manifest over time. When I work in the hospital, no matter whether I’m on surgery or internal medicine, we as a team will often go visit the radiologists in person to go over the imaging. This is a win-win situation – we the primary team can provide the clinical context and background for the patient’s imaging and in return, we will learn how to read the image and talk through the final diagnosis with the radiologist together. In a teleradiology setup, this important opportunity for collaboration would not exist.

I think it remains to be seen whether or not outsourcing medical diagnoses is a good idea.  If this really becomes a trend, then I might start sweating more and wonder whether other specialties will follow the same path. But for now, I don’t believe this is the future of medicine.

Joyce Ho is a medical student who blogs at Tea with MD.  She can be reached on Twitter @MedGlobalHealth.

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

  • Close Call

    This just illustrates the bright side of primary care specialties: The care they provide is valuable, yet inexpensive enough to get paid DIRECTLY from patients.

    No need for Medicare, no need to bill insurance.

    Family medicine and primary care internal medicine… all you need is your brain and good bedside manner. Go lean, go direct. Get back to the root of being a doctor.

    I do feel sorry for my colleagues dependent on third party payers.

    • adh1729

      However, everyone still has to pay taxes to support Medicare, Medicaid, etc etc. The situation is akin to public education; of course there is the private school option, but everyone still has to pay taxes to support the governmental option, whether they use it or not. Only the rich have real liberty in such a world.
      The government never had any business getting into education or healthcare. We are headed directly for totalitarian socialism. “Freedom” in America is an illusion.

  • Margalit Gur-Arie

    This is the future of medicine, at least for a while. Anything that does not absolutely require physically touching the patient, can and will be done remotely, outsourced and offshored eventually. Quality is irrelevant. I sort of think that all types of surgery may be the safest bets, although that is changing too.

  • Accurate Data Entry

    Looking at the pace outsourcing is going on. I think it would not even spare health care ,
    it has been already so prominent in the some of the aspects for health
    care industry such as medical transcription, teleradiology etc.

Most Popular