10 ways to make EMRs more doctor-friendly

10 ways to make EMRs more doctor friendly

Today I’m doing anesthesia for colonoscopies and upper GI scopes.  Nowadays we have three board-certified anesthesiologists doing anesthesia for GI procedures every single day at my institution.  I’ll probably do 8 cases today.  I will sign into a computer or electronically sign something 32 times.  I have to type my user name and password into 3 different systems 24 times.

I’m doing essentially the same thing with each case, but each case has to have the same information entered separately.  I have to do these things, but my department also pays four full-time masters-level trained nurses to enter patient information and medical histories into the computer system, sometimes transcribed from a different computer system.  Ironically, I will also generate about 50 pages of paper, since the computer record has to be printed out.  Twice.

No wonder everyone hates electronic medical records (EMR)!  I don’t know anything about computers, and I don’t know what systems other hospitals have.  I may be dreaming of a world that doesn’t exist or that world is here and I haven’t heard about it.  Nevertheless, here’s my wish list for a system that doctors would actually want to use:

1. Eliminate the user names and passwords.  You can’t tell me that in this day of retinal scans and hand-held computers that there isn’t a better way to secure data.  What if each person had their own iPad that you only have to sign into once a day that automatically signs your charts.  If you’re worried about people leaving them sitting around use a retinal scan or fingerprint instant recognition system.

2. Eliminate the paper.  If you’re going to have full-time people entering data for you, why print it out?  It’s on the computer for anyone to access.

3. All data systems must be compatible.  You can’t have patient data entered in one place that doesn’t automatically import into another place.  If my anesthesia record can’t talk to the hospital EMR, I have to re-type everything in, which is completely ridiculous.

4. Everybody has to use the same system.  Everybody, state-wide.  Right now, electronic records from a nearby hospital are not available at my hospital, even though the two hospitals are right across the street from each other.

5. Don’t make me turn the page.  All the important information about a patient should be on the first page you open when you look up a patient.  I shouldn’t have to click six different tabs.  Specific to anesthesia, all the relevant data about the patient including what medications they have received during the case should be automatically displayed on the screen when you start a case.  Specific to primary care, all the latest labs and data, recent appointments with specialists, current med list and anything else the doctor wants to see commonly should be right on the first screen.

6. Don’t make me have to repeat myself.  If I do eight cases the same way, with the same documentation required for each case, I still have to enter that documentation each time.  If I’m seeing 20 patients in primary care clinic and the rules require the same documentation for each person, I shouldn’t have to enter that documentation each time.

7. Invest in development of really good voice-recognition software.  If I’m sitting across from a patient, I want to look at them and talk to them, not talk to them and look at a computer screen.  If my mother didn’t make me take typing in high school, I don’t want to have to spend 3 hours after-hours every evening pecking my conversations with my patients into a computer, or worse, checking boxes electronically.

8. Get rid of the wires.  In this day of wireless, why am I still tripping over monitoring wires and untangling cords?  My spin bike at the gym can pick up my heart rate without a wire.  Why can’t my anesthesia monitor?

9. If you need a typist, hire a typist.  Every time a new rule or documentation requirement pops up, which in my institution is daily, it is always laid on the nurses to add that to their computer records.  Nurses used to be nurses.  Now they are data-entry specialists.  Their checklist and pre-operative paperwork is longer than mine.  And they aren’t doing any diagnosis or treatment.

10. Triple back-up the system.  Computers crash.  Paper doesn’t.  There’s got to be a way to make the system rock-solid reliable.

Shirie Leng is an anesthesiologist who blogs at medicine for real.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

email

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1338422225 Tom Garvey

    Yes, yes, and yes! Why were these not requirements for EMRs to begin with? Why are these being imposed upon us without being rigorously tested for safety and effectiveness?

  • Guest

    Amen sister!

  • http://onhealthtech.blogspot.com Margalit Gur-Arie

    Love this post, in a perverse sort of way, I might add. Here is why: with a couple of exceptions, everything you hate is within the control of your hospital and has almost nothing to do with the EMR itself.

    #1: You can, but it costs more. Is the hospital willing to pay something to save you the trouble?
    #2: That’s hospital policy and process. EMR does not make you print.
    #3: You wouldn’t have to re-type if the hospital invested in some very simple ADT interfaces between the systems.
    #4: Same as above, but maybe ask the hospitals if they are interested in sharing data. You’ll be surprised by the answer.
    #5: This is EMR related. Everybody wants that and many systems have a summary page that is exactly what you describe. To the T.
    #6: The hospital should have taken the trouble to configure prefilled procedure templates, so you click on the colonoscopy and voila – it’s all there and you get to tweak if needed.
    #7: This is also EMR related. It is very hard, and it requires that people let go of some anachronistic conceptions regarding structured data, but there is good progress out there. Not good enough for you to use, but it is coming (see IBM Watson videos).
    #8: Wireless is more expensive to deploy and maintain. EMRs don’t care about the network. Again, this is a hospital decision.
    #9: Policies and regulation and hiring proper resources for you are up to the hospital. Nothing to do with the EMR.
    #10: Backups and redundancy is up to your hospital IT folks, not the software vendor. The better the system for you, the more money the hospital has to spend.

    There are many things wrong with EMRs, but hospitals need to implement them right too.

    • http://www.facebook.com/obinna.akunna Obinna Akunna

      I don’t buy your logic at all. Just about anything can be fixed with more money. Heck we could have flying cars if we were willing to spend more money….but it does not make sense. Not sure why EMRs are any different.

      • southerndoc1

        Dr. Leng’s hospital bought a Yugo. She wants a Corvette with all the options. Don’t blame the Yugo.

        • http://www.facebook.com/shirie.leng Shirie Leng

          Good point.

      • http://www.facebook.com/shirie.leng Shirie Leng

        They’re not different. But remember EMR was supposed to DECREASE health care costs.

    • azmd

      Unfortunately, since these days very few hospitals are run by doctors who are familiar with the clinical workflow involved in caring for patients, the policies and procedures that flow from the top are going to create inefficiencies rather than solve them.

    • kjindal

      yes i agree. Even the very basic EMR / order entry system our facility uses is pretty customizable. It’s the facility’s (large nursing home) IT department heads and administration that MAKE it inefficient for us. For example, in a recent meeting about a system “update” (which usually means headaches, errors, layers), the MDs asked again for the order entry system to either print or electronically transmit rxs upon discharge from the facility. This would save us the hassle (and possible error from illegibility) of writing 20 rxs for meds/DMEs etc. But the IT head laughed and said “ha ha, I don’t wanna be on the 6 o’clock news for violating HIPAA”?!?!?! Even those IN HEALTHCARE don’t understand HIPAA. So yes, we are shooting ourselves in the foot.

      Although I do agree completely that EMRs need to have clinician input from the beginning, rather than developing a crappy product that just has layers piled upon it with each “update” requiring 60 clicks to login, see what meds a patient is on, find their allergies, etc. We now have a pop-up box when we order a narcotic that says “Please follow state and federal guidelines when ordering this medication”!!! And this was one of the glorious “updates”. F-ing idiotic.

    • http://www.facebook.com/shirie.leng Shirie Leng

      Ha! Just as I suspected. There ARE things we can do. We aren’t doing them. Thanks Margalit!

  • Docbart

    If you feed at the hospital trough, then learn to love swill. Those of us in independent practice can still have paper charts if we want them.

  • http://twitter.com/STATehr STATehr

    You have alot of great points. Some of the solution are much easier then others, some are mandated by laws, such as signing each vist.. it is there to make sure that it has been reviewed I believe. But other things like speech to text. There are a couple of solutions for that. One cost money and the other dose not. They both do about the same quality job. One is a software that is integrated with some EHR’s and they charge extra. The other is using most newer tablets such as the iPad, the speech to text dose a very impressive job recognizing medical terms. We have several Dr.’s using are EHR and they love it.

    Having a dash board with a important info about the patient. We have that and I am sure other venders do to. The back up problem we offer a solution for that. we are building a hybrid cloud modle which there are two point of back up. One in the cloud and the other is a mini server that run tandem so if one should go down your practice is not down.

    Data Compatibility.. that is a dream that I hope one day will become fully realized. There are a lot of EHR venders working together now to help with interoperability. But it is not easy. For example lets take the patient’s first name. One EHR/EMR could call that data fname, and another can call it firstN, or even 1name,fn.. you get the point. That is just a simple piece of Data. When you are sending the dada from one to the other they dont know it is first name because they are named differently .. I would love to see some standards in place like html code that tell all venders the data name of first name is __ and we all use it. But that is not the case right now, and with HL7 the lines are a bit blurred and far more complicated.

    For username and password. If you are carrying around the same ipad and using it all day and it is with our EHR you should not be logged out. Yet if it sits ideal I believe, it is again a law requirement..
    Most of what you are asking it is out there, just have to look and decide which vender and what feature you want more.

  • http://www.physiciandesigns.com/ Haroon Saleemi

    Really good post. We deal with a lot of clients who are looking at EMRs for their practices and its almost comedic at what’s out there.

  • Beckie

    Great article . These are all issues I would not have thought of, aside from the paper usage. I will never rely solely upon a computer for 100% of anything. I am NOT a physician, but I teach practice management courses at the college level. I don’t like not having a paper copy of anything in my hand to review. Sometimes the electronic access just isn’t (dare I say it) convenient.

Trending