How often should I screen for disease?

Surprise! It turns out that if every woman in the US got a mammogram every year, almost exactly the same number of them would still die of breast cancer. Why? Watch this video. Read this by TBTAM. Bottom line: mammograms don’t find aggressive cancers soon enough (by definition, you can’t), while too many of the cancers they do find were never going to be fatal anyway. This is what “over-diagnosis” means.

The same problem arises when discussing other kinds of cancer screenings. Prostate cancer, for example, also tends to age more slowly than the men it’s growing in, usually outliving them (patients die of something else first). Thus, the official acknowledgment that the harms of screening outweigh the benefits has resulted in the changed official recommendation from “screen” to “don’t screen.” Then again, I did just pick up a case of completely asymptomatic metastatic prostate cancer from a screening PSA in a 50-something year old patient. Go figure.

Even the venerable annual physical isn’t worth it. No one can show any actual health benefit to any kind of annual medical review (in the absence of symptoms, of course). It has been shown that patients who have a regular relationship with a primary care physician tend to do better than folks who never see a doctor. But in the absence of acute illness, how does one go about establishing that relationship? Some kind of periodic evaluation is obviously in order, but what “period” should we recommend (given that “annual” seems to be too frequent)?

The United States Preventive Services Task Force is one body charged with generating these kinds of official recommendations. This doesn’t stop all kinds of other folks (medical specialty societies, disease oriented groups, and so on) from also promulgating their own guidelines. Is it any surprise when these conflict? (hint: no)

The thing about guidelines is that, again by definition, they represent population-based recommendations. They are derived from population-based data (studies done on large numbers of people), which result in statements that are intended to apply to populations, or, well, large numbers of people.

Here’s my problem. Although I may take care of “large numbers of people,” I do not take care of populations. I take care of patients one at a time. Turns out that applying those population-based guidelines to the individual patient sitting in front of me isn’t always straightforward.

What to do?

TBTAM does a wonderful job of summarizing the discussions she presumably has with her patients about these kinds of issues (risks of birth control pills, hormone replacement therapy, and yes, mammograms). Similar talking points apply when discussing prostate cancer screenings with male patients. Most of these kinds of discussions end up with some version of, “joint decision making with a fully informed patient.”

A lot of the time, this still doesn’t help.

Never fear, the Dinosaur is here. Here is my answer to the newest age-old question, “How often should I …?” (see the doctor/get a mammogram/pap/PSA/etc.):

Once in a while.

Mammogram every five years? Probably good enough to catch most of the slow-growing, non-fatal (unless completely ignored) malignancies. Paps every seven years? Ditto. We already know colonoscopies more often than every ten years are probably overkill.

Screening cardiovascular blood work (cholesterol)? Every five years. That’s from Medicare’s preventive screening guidelines (ie. what they’ll pay for.)

Physical exams? Beats me. Most “physicals” are more an exercise in paperwork than anything else. Every five to ten years? Once every couple of years? Like so much else in medicine, it depends; mainly on the patient.

Think about it: the people who get into trouble are the folks who NEVER do any of these things. Checking in with a doctor once in a while, whatever seems right to a given individual, is probably good enough. Certainly better that not going at all.

Bear in mind, of course, that ALL of the above applies to people who are well. No symptoms. No pains. No lumps, no bumps. No overpowering thirst, constant urination, and blurred vision (the most common things I hear from “asymptomatic” patients I diagnose with diabetes upon discovering their blood sugar is 300). Screening means looking for things you have no reason to expect to find, by definition.

Because if you have a mass in your breast, you definitely need a mammogram.

Otherwise, just be sure to come see me once in a while.

Lucy Hornstein is a family physician who blogs at Musings of a Dinosaur, and is the author of Declarations of a Dinosaur: 10 Laws I’ve Learned as a Family Doctor.

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

  • Mathew Philips

    I think Physicians should take their call in screening, just following the society recommendations is not enough. I once had this patient who has been a smoker for 10 years. He is a young chap, immensely rich. He was worried about his lungs but was not willing to quit smoking. I recommended a CT for screening and it picked a 5mm lesion !
    But the radiologist was frowning when is saw “CT Screening”
    Anyway Dr.Hornstein what you said is absolute truth. You get the screening when you absolutely alright. That’s why its called sceening.!

  • SBornfeld

    I don’t know whatever happened to “evidence-based” medicine. There are NO guidelines for screening (as far as the USPSTF is concerned) except you should “speak to your doctor” to discuss your particular risk profile.
    As far as Welch is concerned, screenings in older women are worthless because younger women who don’t get screened show similar changes in advanced disease?
    And PSA is to be abandoned for screening because most guys die with (rather than from) their cancer? You’d never guess that prostate ca is the second biggest cancer killer of men.
    There is NO WAY to tell that disease picked up on screening is aggressive–yes. There is also no way to tell that it is NOT aggressive. Should we get better at distinguishing the two? Sure.
    BTW, tell my cousin’s mom that colonoscopies more than every 10 years is overkill (he died 8 years after a clean colonoscopy at age 40).

Most Popular