A war in the House of Medicine: Can women physicians help?

A war is brewing in the House of Medicine.  It’s a war of philosophy based on how we physicians approach our patients–the people who come to us to be cared for and to be cared about.  The people who come as patients to the physician as healer, a healer who also has a wealth of scientific knowledge which can be used to stamp out disease and bring long, healthy lives to many more people than ever in the history of humankind.

There is no doubt that science has allowed us to save babies who have emerged from their mother’s womb months before the world is ready for them.  It is that same science that has allowed centenarians to become commonplace, many of whom are highly active.  And it that same science that has created technologies that have almost made it moot to actually touch the patient for a physical examination and now even an operation.

But it is also this science, based in “evidence” that is increasingly creeping into and undermining the patient-healer relationship.  And it is not the science/evidence per se that is potentially harmful, but rather the fact that it is allowed to supplant, not supplement, the core of what should be a sacred relationship.  It crowds out the physician as healer who cares about the patient as unique person.

Sticking with evidence alone, we lose sight of the personal.  We look at images, numbers, and “objective evidence.”  Patients want us to care about them as human beings.  They want us to hear their voices, their concerns, their fears and their pain.  Things not easily quantified and objectified.  It’s a tall order, I will admit, but it is not impossible.

How can women help?  Women physicians are in a unique position to change this patient care paradigm.  Women are brought up with a different mind set.  Relationships that share intimacies are very important to us as we grow up.  And even though our schooling and training acculturates us to the medicine as science, many of us have rebelled against only doing business this way.

Here’s how.  In general:

  • We take longer with patients.
  • We order fewer tests.
  • We do fewer procedures.
  • We interrupt less.
  • We ask more.
  • We hear more.

And for all of this we are called less productive.  We are devalued for our style of relating to the patient, of tackling their problems.

The naysayer might ask, “Is there any proof that this approach will make a difference?”  Yes, scientifically speaking there is the placebo effect, which can be measured and can be very strong.  And so we must find other ways to show that our patients benefit from the healer in us so we can help to restore them to sound body and mind.

We have entered an era where evidence based medicine is constantly cited as the panacea for all that ails our healthcare system.  Clearly it is not.  It is limited because people are so uniquely different.  And it is up to us to recognize each person’s unique humanity and try to connect to them so that they have hope, positive energy, and the feeling that their problems will at least be heard, and in a most perfect world, solved.

So, as relative newcomers to the House of Medicine, women have to re-emphasize the relationships that are necessary to form if we are to make the evidence most effective.  Next steps:  study these relationships, learn how women physicians work best, define our attitudes about patient care, and redefine what constitutes “productivity” for physician healers. And then there will be war no more.

Linda Brodsky is a pediatric surgeon who blogs at The Brodsky Blog.  She is founder of Women MD Resources.

View 11 Comments >

Most Popular