Shorten medical training by 30% without sacrificing quality

As a teenager in the mid-late 1990s, my father, an engineering educator, and I would talk about the ills of the healthcare system and how physicians lost control of healthcare: primarily because they concentrated on medicine rather than the forces changing healthcare delivery. I realized this was due to an outdated medical education system and reforming it might actually improve healthcare in this country. That was my Sputnik Moment.

Since graduating high school in 2000, I have been involved in medical education without interruption. I completed my BA/MD from the University of Missouri Kansas City’s (UMKC) 6-year program in 2006, and then moved on to be an administrative chief resident in the OB-GYN Department at Emory University. I currently serve as a Fellow in the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at Washington University-St. Louis School of Medicine.

My Sputnik moment was re-ignited after reading the recent article by Ezekiel Emanuel, MD PhD, and Victor Fuchs, PhD, which highlights the 100-year-old dilemma that is medical education in this country. Their commentary describes the pathway to becoming a subspecialty physician in this country, and proposes reducing the length of medical training by 30 percent in an effort to reduce health care costs.

While it’s easy to become polarized by the political elements of Dr. Emanuel’s proposals, we are ultimately distracted from the main point:  medical school is expensive and a more efficient, cost effective, path toward a medical degree should be available.

UMKC’s School of Medicine’s model of medical education has thrived for over 40 years, graduating more than 3,000 physicians since it’s beginning in 1971. The pathway for medical education reform should involve guiding students from high school into medical school, where they can be placed into learning teams, and avoid the MCAT and its predatory preparatory course costs. Over 60% of graduating medical students report taking a prep course, which can cost upwards of $9,000. A year round, 6-year approach is more efficient and does not sacrifice quality or leadership in building the next generation of physicians.

With an average medical student debt burden of $157,944, by shortening my medical training a full two years, I effectively reduced the cost of my medical education by 25% (my tuition varied over the six years; approximately $18-22,000 over 6 years from 2000-2006). And let’s not forget that the $157,944 figure represents the loan burden after four years of medical school. Furthermore, the AAMC’s figure does not account for the additional $12,400 average tuition related debt per undergraduate degree accumulated prior to entrance into medical school.

In 2011, 47.3% of graduating medical students reported their decision to become a physician came before or during high school, while 24.2% decided to become a physician in the first two years of college Youth are more informed and able to access information, utilize technology and exchange ideas much easier than when Abraham Flexner’s report on medical education came out in 1910. The complexity of medical knowledge has changed immensely, but our education system has been slow to catch up. One-hundred years later, it is time to revisit Flexner’s report.

A 30% reduction in training length is attainable by providing an option for pursuit of a combined BA/MD degree in the vein of my alma mater. Such a track will lower costs and shorten the time to workforce entry, while adding time for research fellowships and/or humanitarian opportunities. Additionally, as women comprise half of all medical school graduates, as a reproductive endocrinologist, I must point out that a condensed approach has positive ramifications on future fertility in the era of delayed childbearing and increasing infertility.

Ultimately, such a 6-year track may not be for everyone, but for the high school graduate who wants to have a career in medicine, be it as a clinician, physician/scientist or public health guru, an option for an accelerated path to achieving an MD degree provides a highly employable skill set with a lower debt burden that will only benefit the delivery of healthcare in the 21st century.

Kenan Omurtag reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellow and can be reached on Twitter @stlinfertility.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

 

email

  • dave comstock

    Training children to be doctors is not the be-all/end-all answer to health care costs.  That it worked for you, I’m glad, but too many medical students are there through family legacy, and are involved in health care for the wrong reason: money.  There are many amazing opportunities to reduce costs through public service of rural areas, native american health care services, and military service.  In fact, the US military has a 100% tuition payment program and provides medical education opportunities that benefit everyone.  Why don’t more students take advantage of this?  Because they want to climb the resume ladder, and make more money.

    College undergrads, let alone high school students, have no idea what life is about – and this isn’t something they’re going to learn in medical school.  If you’re focused on getting married, having kids, and supporting your family, your patient focus is compromised.  If you haven’t been married, had kids, and supported a family, you have no idea what your patients are going through.  With this is mind, why is there such discrimination against older, non-traditional students?  Students that understand what life is about, and have some idea what it means to be a patient.

    • hockiemack

      Europe and Canada train “children” right outta high school. I agree that college undergrads and high school students may be naive with less real life experience, but I don’t think it makes a difference as far as training to become a doctor.

      I took time off between college and med school and definitely thought it was worth it, but my classmates in med school who went straight through are doing just as well with life as I am.

      Also what are you talking about with discrimination against older people? Nobody is suggesting that medical school should ONLY be a 6 year track right out of high school.

      • Kenan Omurtag

        hockiemack, thanks for the comments!…more 6 year opportunities should be available since 50% of graduating physicians knew this was the path they wanted to take before graduating from high school. Furthermore I contend that such a path results in a lower debt burden, a topic that is widely cited and even currently being debated in congress.
        Thanks for the comments and hope you will share.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason-Simpson/100001631757606 Jason Simpson

    The US military has a cap on how much they pay for tuition costs, it is nowhere near 100% of tuition at the expensive med schools.

  • dave comstock

    http://www.goarmy.com/amedd/education/hpsp.html
    The F. Edward Hébert Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program is available to qualifying students who wish to earn professional degrees from accredited medical, dental, optometry, veterinary, psychiatric nurse practitioner, clinical or counseling psychology programs. We will pay 100 percent of your tuition, plus we will also pay for required books, equipment and most academic fees. Qualifying medical and dental students are also eligible to receive a $20,000 sign-on bonus. 

  • Kenan Omurtag

    I appreciate the time that Jason and Dave took to read and commentWhile I agree that it is to look at medical students today who show up to class driving the latest model luxury car and wonder what their motives are, the majority of medical students want to take care of patients and be involved in health care…the reason they are seeking “money” is because in order to achieve this goal is because they are in major debt as is well known. Many of classmates in fact (5% of my class) actually enrolled into the military as officers and are taking on great public health opportunities abroad and getting leadership training that one cannot get as a civilian – all the while having their tuition covered – there is that debt issue again…I agree that the military is a great opportunity, but it is not for everyone, NOR is a 6 year program our of high school. The ageism that exists in medical school is one that I have little experience but recall that it is unfair as the non-traditional student has much to offer…

  • Spanky11

    I too am a graduate of a six year program and I spent 4 of those six years defending myself against people critical of me and my decision to participate in this program. The usual comments were that the students in that program were not mature enough, or inexperiecned enough. My usual response (or at least in my head) was “how was two more years of sleeping through pointless classes, getting drunk on weekends and trying to schedule only classes from tue through thursday after 11:00 going to prepare me for medical school. After being out of school for many years I have now come to the conclusion that both sides are right. I think the real answer is most new physicians whether they do 6 year program or 8 years are woefully unpropared for residency when they finish. Not based on their medical knowledge but just in worldly experience and perspective and ability to relate to patients. I think everyone should be required to experience a real world job (not medical research or volunteering in a free clinic or homeless shelter) for a few years before going to medical school. Some of the best students in my class were nontraditional who took things seriously because they were paying for it, time at class was time spent away from their families, not away from the TV, the gym or a party. then only those who truly want to be a doctor would go to medical school as they would have to give up a job that pays them to invest a lot of money for another career.

    Now I could argue that med school itself is a complete waste of time and doing well in school is completely irrelevant to how good of a doctor you are but that is a whole other post.

    • Kenan Omurtag

      I agree that there is less “worldly” experience regardless of the length of training, but this is true in many industries, and one (although not everyone) can “grow” as much in the trenches as they can outside…thanks for reading the article and commenting

    • sFord48

      “how was two more years of sleeping through pointless classes, getting drunk on weekends and trying to schedule only classes from tue through thursday after 11:00 going to prepare me for medical school”
      I spent my time in college learning…

      • Spanky11

        Granted, I did take a little poetic license with the above comment but I do not think that the described experience really is all that different from many college students. I learned a little bit too but what I did not learn is the responsibility of having a full time job, of having to decide when you should come in when sick or call in someone off of time off to cover for you,  of dealing with angry, overly demanding, manipulative or entitled people, all of which you will encounter in medicine, etc. yes many students may have demanding jobs during college high school and yes sometimes during your education you may ahve to deal with some of these things but it is not the same as being really employed. Just ask any professor how often they get asked for extensions, extra credit or every question on the test is argued. There is no extension or extra credit in medicine.

        • sFord48

          While I am not commenting on whether shortening medical education is a good idea or not…you seem to be making the argument that accommodations must be made for substandard students instead of screening applicants for the right characteristics.  Education is important or it’s not.  If everyone fails, it doesn’t make it less important.

          • Spanky11

            I am in no way suggesting medical schools accept substandard students in fact I am stating the exact opposite. My point is that you can do all the things I suggested and have very good grades in college, I, and most of my friends, are living proof of that. The grades don’t mean very much especially with grade inflation these days and in college there is very little else for the medical schools to base their decisions on who is a good student or not. The interview is helpful but by no means a great way to really evaluate students. however, someone who has to work in a real world job will be judged more based on actual performance, work ethic, and personality than just being able to answer multiple choice questions correctly. I am aware that references are inflated as well and that no one wants to give a negative evaluation of an employee. I still believe very litttle is learned in undergraduate courses that will ever help you be a good physician whereas much can be learned by having a position in some industry that can be extremely helpful.

          • sFord48

            You haven’t really said anything.  Students sleep through classes or get good grades like you?  You haven’t put together a rational argument to make your point, just exaggerations.

  • EmilyAnon

    I wonder how comfortable patients would be in letting teenagers or 20 year olds giving them physical exams, or assisting in the delivery room.

    • Kenan Omurtag

      In my experience, I got and still do “how old are you?” but it was always with a smile and met with humorous response and a transition to the patient’s health. I don’t think age matters as much …becuase ultimately, when someone walks in and presents themselves as part of your care-giving team all anyone cares about is whether or not the person is competent with a good “bedside manner.” As far as competence, whether you are 22 or 24 if you have made it to the wards, you have shown competence. As far as bedside manner…age, life experience, etc matters but frankly even with greater age and experience, people will still have awkward bed side manners…lets remember that the “20 year olds” that are doing exams, etc are not walking in looking haggard, khakis sagging listening to their ipod and saying, “what’s up, Im going to exam you now?” They are professionals that take their opportunity seriously.
      Thanks again for the reading the piece and commenting