Are the poor more likely to sue their doctors?

Many physicians, including myself, have the misconception that the indigent patient is more likely to be litigious than those patients with greater financial resources.  A well-organized study that was reported in Clinical Orthopeaedics and Related Research reported that socioeconomically disadvantaged patients tend to sue physicians less often than their more affluent patients.

Dr. Ramon Jimenez and his colleagues at the Monterey Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Institute and his team demonstrated that patients in the lower socioeconomic strata tend to sue doctors less often than those with more income.

Many physicians believe that low-income patients tend to sue their doctors more often than other patients.  This mindset has potential negative effects on the doctor-patient relationship, including some physicians’ reluctance to treat poor patients, or treat such patient differently from other patients groups in medical care terms.

Dr. Jimenez and his colleagues reviewed medical and social studies looking at the differences in litigation rates, and related medical malpractice claims, among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients compared with other groups of patients.  Their analyses show that low-income patients actually sue their doctors less often than other patient groups, in part because of a more limited access to legal resources and a payment system in medical malpractice claims, which requires an advance on funds to litigate the case.

The authors also highlight how physicians may have an unconscious desire to avoid treating poor patients out of concerns about financial reimbursement.  Such physicians might consciously or unconsciously presume that poor patients are more likely to sue, as an excuse or way of avoiding the presumed difficulty associated with collecting payment from low-income patients.  In this situation, the doctor’s unconscious mind can trick him or her into behaving in an undesirable way – a process known as unconscious bias.

Dr. Jimenez suggest that doctors should understand the cultural differences and be able to treat or relate better to a patient from different race, ethnicity, sex, socio-economic status or sexual orientation may help overcome their misperceptions.  In addition improving education and training for the delivery of culturally competent care, and empowering patients to play a more meaningful roles in their healthcare decisions are proven strategies that can positively impact health disparities, the quality of medical care, physician satisfaction and decrease the incidence of medical malpractice litigation.

Bottom Line:  Let’s be a doctor to all patients and not discriminate to those who have less ability to pay for our services.  They are not likely to litigate against us.

Neil Baum is a urologist at Touro Infirmary and author of Marketing Your Clinical Practices: Ethically, Effectively, Economically. He can be reached at his self-titled site, Neil Baum, MDor on Facebook and Twitter.

email

  • NPs Save Lives

    It’s unfortunate that medical professionals think that the underserved would sue more often. Most are just happy to have anyone to care at all. I don’t think that most people would sue over trivial things if the system wasn’t so pushy to do so. Good lord! Just watch all of the lawyer commercials asking if you have taken this or that and to be sure to jump on the bandwagon.

    • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

      But what about the entitlement mindset so many have?

      • http://twitter.com/Hootsbudy John Ballard

        Alice Robertson, your “entitlement mindset” is the new “welfare queen” myth. You’ve been drinking too much of the wrong Kool-ade. 

        I’m sure you can find plenty of examples, especially if you talk with enough people who work in emergency rooms or family services offices. But the numbers and actual sums of money involved are peanuts measured against the well-compensated political types — lawyers, accountants and lobbyists mostly — who carve out huge tax breaks, commissions and kick-backs for their clients.  

        • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

          I go beyond the ER….I go to the ghetto.  I have had two children with cancer….deal with addiction problems in my family, etc.  My daughter is a nurse.  I am personal friends with several doctors.  I do not lack experience, nor knowledge, or the wilingness to give of myself in whatever way I can help….but I want to help…not enable.

          Your argument is not made well on the angle you take… in the fact that two wrongs don’t make a right (pointing to someone doing more harm doesn’t exclude the lesser being absolved).  If one set is wrong…i.e. politicians (and, indeed, I tend to agree with the author of, “Throw Them All Out”) it doesn’t make the entitlementors right.  Our government has created learned helplessness and you can point to the truly needy, but it still doesn’t justify those who we made needy.

          You really can’t deny the entitlement mindset….even if there are those who are worse or bigger offenders….then vote them out of office…but denial of a subset of those who hurt the truly needy by defending them doesn’t help the big picture at all.  Actually, the truly needy should be shouting from the rooftops about the entitlementors because it means they get less help when people take what they don’t deserve.

          • http://twitter.com/Hootsbudy John Ballard

            I can see you and I don’t speak the same language. I’m just an old guy in retirement who spent a career in food service among the working poor. We are like the blind men examining an elephant, each coming to a different conclusion. I’m sorry if I offended you. It’s probably best we agree to disagree. 

          • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

            That’s fine…please know I am not offended.  I enjoy dialogue very much and look upon this type of conversation as an opportunity.  I think sometimes we choose band aid solutions that, ultimately, only help short term..  We may not speak the same language, but we do agree that some people need help.  The problem is I do believe the poor are more likely to sue. A mixture of real justification, empowerment, and entitlement are factors….they just feel like a victim of society on several levels while denying their own accountability (whether it be smoking, eating poorly, selling drugs, inability to get a job or like the Occupiers who wanted their college debt wrote off on the taxpayers dime….it just seems the outrage from supposed victims is so loud you can’t hear the moans of those who truly need help).   A doctor misdiagnosed my teen daughter and delayed her treatment by eight months (the delay in treatment caused the cancer to spread to her lymphs and we live daily with the repercussions of his negligence…not once…but twice he refused to read the lab notes)..  Over and over well meaning friends suggested I sue.  I didn’t….but I felt like it. 

               So….it is not just the poor who feel like the surfs in a feudal system…and sometimes it’s other doctors who are so arrogant they create real victims and it’s not just patients…it’s other doctors who live in the shadow of their colleagues egos.   But, as usual, those who do sue as a recreational type of sport only hurt others (while proclaiming outrage that a doctor hurt them) because it causes doctors to be so cautious there very well could be a class of patients they will avoid out of fear.  We can wax eloquently about doctors caring for everyone regardless of their socio economic status, but doctors can’t just treat the poor because the reimbursement levels are so low few could pay their bills on just treating the poor….most don’t want to treat only the rich (our doctor claims at the Cleveland Clinic some doctors privately share they treat the rich differently….they treat them subtly worse….just because they don’t like them.  They can hold off on calling in pain relief, etc.  I guess some doctors find some sort of satisfaction in that type of behavior. 

            The bottomline is it’s pretty hard to sue a doctor these days.  Lawyers just aren’t taking cases….some malpractice lawyers are getting laid off.   There is more burden of proof.  Doctors just like to whine:)

      • http://twitter.com/Hootsbudy John Ballard

        Here ya go…
        http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3677 “…more than 90 percent of the benefit dollars that entitlement and other mandatory programs[1] spend go to assist people who are elderly, seriously disabled, or members of working households — not to able-bodied, working-age Americans who choose not to work.  (See Figure 1.)  This figure has changed little in the past few years.” 

        • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

          The facts you conveniently quoted are often wrong.  We already know the census facts needed reworked last year because they didn’t include the benefits that pre sixties were not available.  If someone is getting $1000 a month in food stamps that is income, but it wasn’t counted as income.

          The word “needy” is a relative word these days.  I guess what bothers me the most about a post like this is I do help the needy both monetarily and with my time.  I spend time in the ghetto with moms and know firsthand what’s going on there.  Then you come here and read all the so-called altuists who do not do a whole lot other than defend socialistic Keynsian measures that work short term, hurt society and give nothing more than verbal credence to a cause that is important, but needs much more than tax dollars.

          All this verbal anger isn’t helping the poor anymore than Occupy Wall Street’s waste of time.   They didn’t even shoot their arrows correctly because Main Street should have been the target.

  • http://twitter.com/ckstopford Karen Stopford

    Now, take elective procedures like botox and plastic surgery, liposuction and other such services out of the equation and run the stats again.  

  • carolynthomas

    Dr. B, this seems like very common sensical advice, helping to yet again dispel some of the myths surrounding medical litigation as somehow being the fault of greedy patients and their even greedier lawyers.

    Another example: the University of Toronto’s Dr. Wendy Levinson is considered among the world’s foremost researchers on physician-patient communication. In a landmark 1997 study, she recorded hundreds of conversations between physicians and their patients. Half of the doctors had never been sued, and the
    other half had been sued at least twice. Dr. Levinson found that just on the basis of those recorded conversations alone, she could find clear differences between the two groups. More on her results at: “Why Doctors Get Sued” -  http://ethicalnag.org/2010/10/15/why-doctors-get-sued/

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/BRDB4JQJCWCARQUXHEBJBSGNSE arnold

    Not only are the underserved less likely to sue, they are more likely to be appreciative of the care they receive.

  • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

    I am friends with a few lawyers and they claim it’s other doctors to beware of.  They claim they whine about their fear of being sued then are more likely to sue another doctor.  I, obviously, can’t prove this…but my friends claim doctors are the first to cry on the stand.  They are so used to protecting their careers they suffered so long and hard for they lose it…easily.  I wondered about that….they claim it’s because of the coddled status of doctors….I am not sure I agree…residencies can be gruesome….yet, your predecessors were a spoiled lot of golfers without pagers or cell phones (okay…broad brush syndrome:) Trying to get them to show up for a delivery was nearly impossible.  Glad those days are over…but then again people reminisce about Marcus Welby.  Okay…I’ll go with that:)

    Point being many problems in medicine are grassroots.

  • katerinahurd

    A physician should render his medical knowledge and treat a patient independent of his socio- economic status.  I am talking about the ethical physician.  I am not talking about the physician who is more interested in getting paid for his services and is victimized by his fear of a medical malpractice suit.