Why we need a National Health Service Corp

For various reasons our nation’s public health programs have been decimated. This comes at a time when the number of unemployed and health uninsured are at a record high number. Additionally, we are seeing individuals live longer and experience more chronic debilitating illnesses and conditions that stretch the resources of an already under manned and under funded health system.  Emphasizing prevention and healthy living should be a lifetime necessity for each individual and for each community. For this reason I propose the creation of a National Health Service Corp that meets the manpower needs of America and at the same time exposes future doctors and nurses to the varied and diverse health problems that the average citizen faces as they age.

The National Health Service Corp would be part of a National Service Corp developed in the United States.  All graduating high school seniors or 18 year olds would be asked to devote one or two years to providing service before they move on to college or the real work world.  During those two years, enrollees would be trained in civics and government, healthy lifestyle and living, nutrition and first aid while they are providing necessary manpower for rebuilding America.   Enrollees could be used to assist in infrastructure modernization and rebuilding, staffing day care centers so young parents could work, staffing senior day care centers to provide respite care for the increasing number of seniors with cognitive dysfunction and chronic disease and health care facilities such as skilled and assisted living facilities.  The service would be open to healthy seniors and adults as well.  Members of the Service Corp would receive benefits towards higher education and towards the expense of their future health care.  Healthy senior volunteers could receive preferential tax incentives and breaks in exchange for their services.

The National Health Service Corp would be composed of graduate level physicians, nurses and health care trainees who have completed professional school and a newly proposed “general internship “in their profession.  Medical residency and training programs would be extended by two years. The first year would include the old fashioned “rotating internship” during which doctors in training rotate through all the medical specialties including general surgery, emergency medicine, family or general medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology.   The purpose of the general training is to acquaint the young trainees with the unique problems that their colleagues are faced with on a daily basis while treating disease and performing procedures.

In today’ s medical education system, doctors in training receive, at best, a few weeks of training in each of the different areas of medicine during their third year of medical school. They can complete medical school and go directly into specialty training programs directly without receiving the additional necessary training and understanding of the problems each discipline faces in day-to-day decision making.  I believe the lack of familiarity of what other disciplines must consider with regard to decision making care is what contributes, to a large degree, to the poor handoffs and communications between clinicians regarding patient issues and the over dependence on expensive testing and technology rather than the use of clinical judgment.

The enrollees in the National Health Service Corps would be supervised by their residency programs’ faculties as part of  a Federal funding change which discriminates in favor of training programs in primary care and other areas of need and, discriminates in funding and grant approval to programs stressing subspecialty procedure oriented training. Bluntly speaking, programs promoting primary care and specialty programs deemed in short manpower supplies would be funded while those promoting procedure oriented specialties regardless of local and national manpower needs would be penalized with little or  no funding. A doctor in training would be unable to train in a specialty until they have completed their “general training” including serving in the National Health Service Corp.  Those chosen for specialty training would be competitively selected based on the needs of that individual specialty.

The members of the National Health Service Corps would rotate through newly vitalized community Public Health Clinics,  Adult and Children’s’ Day Care Centers, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Assisted Living Facilities, Public Schools and communities underserved by physicians and nurses. Physician and nurse participants of the program would be compensated with salary and benefits appropriate for their post graduate year of training level.  After a year of participation they would return to their post graduate training programs and complete their specialty training.

The manpower generated by the National Health Service Corps would be used to provide public school nurses on a daily basis. It could be used to teach basic health as well as cooking and nutrition courses from the elementary school through high school level.  Public health clinics would be reopened to provide care and services to the general public.  The cost of these visits could be established on a sliding scale level based on an individual’s income and resources. Doctors and nurses would staff day care centers and skilled nursing facilities. This would allow seniors to be treated for most illnesses at the SNF and eliminate the extraordinarily expensive daily ritual of calling 911 and transferring the elderly to an acute care hospital ER because the understaffed and over regulated facilities cannot provide basic services on-site or are fearful of doing so.

In exchange for serving in the volunteer health service and then entering an area of medicine where a true need for manpower exists, the Federal Government would pay for the doctors’ and nurses’ educational expenses if they stay in the needed area of medical care for a 15-year period.

I believe the cost of educational expenses will be more than offset by being able to reduce preventable illness and keep individuals out of expensive inpatient hospital care settings.  Laws would need to be passed to provide sovereign immunity against medical malpractice and frivolous medical liability claims for the doctors, nurses and technicians providing care as part of the National Health Service Corp. This would reduce liability for day care centers and senior facilities as well as public health medical facilities and emergency departments.

The creation of a National Health Service Corp should be part of the overall health care reform program developed by the United States as it moves forward in the 21st century. There is no need to reinvent the wheel and create large impersonal organizations like “Accountable Care Organizations” run by insurance companies and hospital systems.

Instead, we need a return to a broader trained generalist providing service at every community level while having the availability of fewer but better utilized specialists to provide guidance and advice when asked. The specialists may become the leaders of the care team for unique and severe medical conditions (I.e., Acute Crohns Disease or Acute Renal Failure) but in most cases will provide guidance, advice and recommendations to the leaders of the care team.  Any guidelines established for patient care will clearly outline the circumstances specialists will be consulted for and when they will have day-to-day involvement in the care of the patient.

Steven Reznick is an internal medicine physician and can be reached at Boca Raton Concierge Doctor.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2LRZNHDZS6DU45WQ567LPQ7CMI ninguem

    If you took the pay and the tort immunity you propose, and just gave it to physicians to set-up privately, there would be more than enough doctors in rural settings.

    In fact, I’ve seen NHSC docs paying back time……..complain that the local NHSC bureaucracy would DELIBERATELY GO OUT OF THEIR WAY to make the doc’s life miserable.

    The goal is simple. Aggravate the doc, make sure the doc is determined to leave at the eld of the service obligation. No chance of the doc pulling a “Doc Hollywood”, deciding he/she liked it there and chose to stay.

    This creates A Continuing Crisis that only government can solve.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Reznick/100000549195050 Steven Reznick

      I am talking about one year of service when you are young and idealistic and energetic. After the year you would return to your training program and proceed to practice privately if you so choose to. . If you chose to stay in primary care privately for a set period of time, as an independent practitioner , your educational costs would be covered. The idea is to get more docs to understand general practice and to do away with the extraordinary high cost of paying back your student loans as a cause of not entering a primary care field

  • http://www.facebook.com/abcsofra Deborah Murphy

    This kinda reminds me of apprenticeships from years ago. We need something soon and all ideas need to be explored and implemented. Just watching our system crumble isn’t solving the issues. And I love that the energetic, true to heart and the ones so full of innocence would get first hand experience up close and personal. Sometimes the common sense approach is just thrown out the window. This group wouldn’t have been prejudiced with a formal education…so to say. Perhaps compassion would return to our country as a society. OK…am I dreaming on this one :-)

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Reznick/100000549195050 Steven Reznick

      Thanks for the response. Dreaming and raising ideas and thoughts is the only way we will ever solve the health system problems. The proposals our politicians, health insurers, employers and pharmaceutical medical industrial complex firms have instituted over the last 25 years have made matters worse not better. Dreaming and open discussion on sites like this are the ways we develop ideas which may solve current policy problems. Thank you again

  • http://twitter.com/Hootsbudy John Ballard

    This is a truly excellent suggestion. I’m reminded of the Peace Corps, VISTA and other similar programs which unfortunately seems to have lost their sparkle in recent years. The seeds of such a program may lie in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program launched in 2007. I’m not familiar with the details, but I really like the approach.

    A couple of years ago I read about Germany doing away with the draft which was expected to have a negative impact on that country’s delivery of health care.

    http://www.npr.org/2010/12/24/132262046/as-germany-ends-draft-fears-of-a-labor-shortage

    Germany apparently never stopped conscription after the war (who knew?) and many young people elected civilian service, especially in hospitals, in lieu of the military.

    Prepare to be opposed by a large and growing opposition to your idea, Dr. Reznick. I notice somebody already left a resentful comment from another doctor, one of many who feel threatened by current trends in health care. The political opposition to PPACA was harsh from the start but appears to be reaching the verge of panic as election-year rhetoric ratchets up. In response to your suggestion I can imagine a reincarnation of anti-Obama hit-pieces — Google “Obama brown-shirts” and see what comes up. Keep up the good work and don’t let yourself be deterred by naysayers.

  • SomeDerm

    Am I the only one who sees the galling hypocrisy here?

    The author is a concierge physician – a man whose entire career is essentially dedicated to providing care for only the most affluent Americans who can afford his $1,800 retainer.  Perhaps this is all a means to assuage his guilt – forcing new medical school graduates to take care of all those patients too poor & uninsured for him to bother would help him feel better about himself.

    He should consider expanding his plan – maybe all physicians opting for cash-only or concierge practices should also be required to serve in the National Health Service Corps to maintain medical licensure as well. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Reznick/100000549195050 Steven Reznick

      Thank you for the response. Yes after practicing for twenty six years in a traditional internal medicine practice I converted my practice to a concierge model. My patients had aged with me and required more time not less. Seeing 30-35 elderly senior citizens within the time constraints created by discount health insurance company plans left them with less than comprehensive care and advocacy and me questioning at the end of the day whether the job I was doing was meeting their needs and my quality guidelines. I did not make this change easily or without a good deal of  concern. I did leave 25% of the patient slots for scholarships saving them for my elderly patients who could not afford the annual membership fee. I have continued to keep those slots for patients unable to afford the fee over the seven years of providing care in my community. I do a fair amount of volunteer work seeing patients in settings outside my office and providing care to those who do not always have access to it. I continue to teach new medical students at two university affiliated programs. With a smaller practice I have the time to do volunteer work and pro bono care while in the traditional practice, seeing 35-40 patients a day the opportunity to do anything other than see patients didnt exist.
      My idea is not one out of guilt. It is built upon seeing how perverted, greedy and detrimental the current system is to providing comprehensive care to Americans. I see my colleagues , through the Medicare Payment Review Commission , be overcompensated for simple low risk five minute procedures while my primary care colleagues get compensated 1/3 of that payment for spending thirty minutes reviewing a senior citizen’s medications prescribed by seven different physicians none of whom considered the effect ones prescription would have on the other. I have made rounds at the skilled nursing facility on my elderly cognitively impaired individual with a projected life span of less than a year who recognizes no family members anymore and when I picked up  his T shirt to listen to his lungs found 27 biopsy sites where a visiting dermatologist removed 27 basal cell carcinomas after convincing his almost as impaired wife of the danger of cancer.  On  my way from the hospital to my office I pass a medical office building that houses five cardiology offices each of which is supporting its own nuclear camera for in office stress testing. You want to talk gall and greed look at the way the American College of Physicians and AMA are dismantling general internal medicine and general practice based on the recommendations of their specialty laden membership.
      The country needs a revitalized public health system. There is a tsunami wave of baby boomers facing old age.There are millions of young school age children receiving no health and nutrition education and few if any checkups and evaluations for growth appropriate benchmarks.  Specialty care does not meet their needs and is built around expensive procedures designed to detect sickness and treat it not prevent it. The young entering the profession have the energy and idealism to make a difference. The system as a whole will benefit greatly from tomorrows doctors receiving a more complete and well rounded general medical and surgical education. It is only with that type of background that they can refer, consult and advise intelligently. Reviving the rotating internship for a year and spending a paid year in service in our neighborhoods and communities will give the nations future caregivers the depth of knowledge to be better physicians, nurses and human beings.
      Warren Buffet a reknowned capitalist and billionaire proposed a tax rate change for America. You may like his idea or not like his idea but you debate it on its merits. I ask you the do the same with my idea. Criticize or expand the ideas. This isn’t about guilt ! Its about a discourse and discussion to help solve problems that the politicians, insurers and employers have mangled badly the last 25 years.

      • SomeDerm

        I’ve come to expect most of the posters on this site to spew their vitriol against specialists, but this really takes the cake. 

        Let’s not pretend that primary care is somehow immune from unethical & greedy behavior.  If you prefer to hurl accusations, let’s talk about my melanoma patient who developed a nodule by his scar and went to his PCP, who told him that he didn’t need to see us greedy dermatologists and that he could excise that “cyst” right there in clinic.  And since it was just a cyst, it certainly didn’t need to be sent to an overpaid dermatopathologist either and could just be discarded after surgery.  Six months later, when he had developed 4 more “cysts” at that site, his PCP offered to excise those too, but the patient came to me for a 2nd opinion only to find out that those were all in-transit metastases.  Or we can talk about the patients I’ve seen who are covered in scars because their PCPs insist on removing their “suspicious moles” (almost all of which end up having banal pathology) with full excisions with layered closures rather than simple biopsies.

        In any case, I stand by my original statement, and am opposed to the idea of mandated service requirements.  Earlier generations of physicians had no problem taking advantage of the system for all it was worth back in the 70′s and 80′s.  When they couldn’t do that anymore, many shifted over to alternative practice models to preserve their bottom lines.  In all honestly, I have no problem with that – they should be free to use their medical degrees as they see fit.  But for them to turn around and place demands of forced labor on future generations of physicians is hypocritical to say the least.

        If it’s good for the goose, it should be good for the gander too.  If you support this plan, then you shouldn’t have any issues with mandated public service requirements for older physicians as well, especially those that opt out of traditional practice models and cater primarily to the wealthy.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Reznick/100000549195050 Steven Reznick

          Actually the vitriol came from your response using words like gall and attacking my current practice format rather than the idea and concept. This is supposed to be a forum for the discussion of ideas rather than a personal attack. You seem to forget that. I am not saying that primary care is immune to errors, greed, arrogance and everything inappropriate for professional patient care. I am saying that we have a physician shortage in primary care training coupled with a specialty top heavy training enrollment. The future primary care physicians and specialty physicians we train must have a much broader and generalized frame of reference if  the care we deliver is to improve. A return to the rotating internship, a year in a national health program and paying for the education of those who stay in primary care is one of my ideas to accomplish this.

          • SomeDerm

            “Actually the vitriol came from your response using words like gall and
            attacking my current practice format rather than the idea and concept.”

            Wrong.  I have an issue with older physicians who demand  that younger medical graduates pick up their slack & take exclusive responsibility for the care of poor and uninsured patients, while they cherry-pick the wealthiest patients for their private practices. 

            If you honestly believe that a mandated “National Health Service Corps” is such a great idea, then why are you so resistant to the idea of it being imposed on yourself on your colleagues?  If its such a great idea then why aren’t you willing to do it yourself?

            ” I am not saying that primary care is immune to errors, greed, arrogance
            and everything inappropriate for professional patient care.”

            But you only chose to single out specialists in your wholesale attack (which is par for the course for this site).

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Reznick/100000549195050 Steven Reznick

            I am not the least bit opposed to having this type of situation imposed on physicians in general. The logistics of imposing this on existing practitioners makes it much more difficult to implement. The point is that younger physicians in training can benefit greatly form additional general medical exposure at that point in their career to be more complete physicians.  They  do not yet have a practice to leave and patients to leave when they serve. Most of them still have the zeal and youthful idealism that is extraordinarily helpful when practicing in the geriatric environment where burnout occurs rapidly. I do not see my suggestion as imposing anything other than an opportunity for physicians in training to receive a well rounded and complete education while meeting the manpower needs of a severely depleted primary care and public health workforce. I am also suggesting that the argument that young docs can not go into primary care because PCP low reimbursement is a barrier to being able to pay back the cost of their education can be eliminated. If they stay in primary care  the government will pick up the cost of their education. I have not suggested that the care of the poor is the sole responsibility of the younger medical graduates in fact that is why  physicians of all ages, specialties and experience do charitable work,go on missions, supervise and participate in health fairs and community outreach programs and teach med students and supervise them in their patient care and training. I additionally did not suggest that the year of service be in a poverty stricken area or geographically undesirable area as the current National Health Service requires. KevinMD.com  is a forum for ideas. If you have an original idea on how to increase the primary care work force and deliver care to the masses why don’t you state it and let the readers on this venue discuss its merits and minuses rather than delivering your personal attack on a style of medicine and physician you know little or  nothing about. 

  • http://twitter.com/Hootsbudy John Ballard

    Woohoo! Looks like you hit a nerve, Dr. Reznick. 
    This jumped off the screen at me…

    I have made rounds at the skilled nursing facility on my elderly cognitively impaired individual with a projected life span of less than a year who recognizes no family members anymore and when I picked up  his T shirt to listen to his lungs found 27 biopsy sites where a visiting dermatologist removed 27 basal cell carcinomas after convincing his almost as impaired wife of the danger of cancer.  On  my way from the hospital to my office I pass a medical office building that houses five cardiology offices each of which is supporting its own nuclear camera for in office stress testing.

    Doesn’t sound like vitriol to me. In fact, it reminds me of something my wife’s OB doctor said many years ago. She mentioned to him that one of our children said she wanted to become a doctor. He replied “Good. Tell her to be a dermatologist. There are no emergencies and they never get well.”  Grim and inaccurate dark humor, I’m sure. But he made a good point.

    In my post-retirement work as a non-medical care-giver I have seen the kinds of scenes you mentioned more than I want to think about. And they have not all involved seniors. In one instance it was a young man in his forties with terminal cancer who was discharged to go home to die. His “home” was the one-bedroom apartment of his father who was wheelchair bound. It was an unconscionable situation, especially when the so-called social worker associated with the hospice company which picked up the account came and went doing nothing about the situation. After I twisted a few tails he got moved to a residential hospice where he died a couple days later, but even at that late stage of his miserable life the hospice company seemed more concerned with their profit line than appropriate palliative care.

  • sFord48

     $1800 x 400 patients is $720,000 per year plus billing to medicare. The way to solve the primary care crisis to have all primary care doctors provide concierge care and help a few poor people on the side.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Reznick/100000549195050 Steven Reznick

      Actually its $1800 x 300 patients with 100 slots kept for patients who can not afford the membership fee. That does not include volunteer work at clinics, supervising students at clinics or work done with charitable and youth organizations. 
      Concierge medicine and direct pay medicine are a physician solution to a failure of politicians, employers, health insurance companies and firms producing medical devices, equipment and pharmaceuticals to come up with a fair and equitable health delivery system. In my career as a physician I have been a physician employee of a senior physician, an independent practitioner, a member of a physician organized 45 doctor Group Practice Without Walls and an employed physician of a national  physician management company which went belly up returning me to private practice. I have seen the economic model change multiple times led by ” insurers and economic consultants.”  Concierge medicine is the first doctor innovation and patient consumer driven model i have participated in.  That being said, regardless of my practice style I still like the idea of increased generalist training and government guarantee of loan repayment if you stay in those areas of medicine that are desperately needing new members

      • sFord48

        “Concierge medicine and direct pay medicine are a physician solution to a failure of politicians, employers,  ”
        It seems like you agree.  As long as 75% can afford fees, it works out great…why do you seem so offended.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Reznick/100000549195050 Steven Reznick

          Thanks for the response. I am not offended by your reply. I was a bit thin skinned to SomeDerm’s comments because I do believe we should be discussing ideas and concepts and his comments really seemed more like a personal attack based on my practice style.
          I think we need to find ways to rebuild primary care, public health and general medicine and we will not accomplish that until we can make it financially sensible for an individual who may be the sole family wage earner to stay in primary care and expand access and care to American citizens.  

  • militarymedical

    Forgive me for a spelling-nazi comment, but I have to do this:  “corp” (or, more accurately, “corp.”) is an abbreviation for “corporation.”  I don’t think that’s what you mean, Dr. Reznick.  I believe what you intended was “corps,” French for “body” or, less literally, a group of people.  Examples:  Marine Corps, Peace Corps.  This misuse of the term really irritates both Marines and former Peace Corps Volunteers and staffers (I was one) – one of the many things they have in common, though both would deny it.  But I digress.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Reznick/100000549195050 Steven Reznick

      Sorry. No insult intended. A body of health care providers 

  • Dorothygreen

    Seems to me we have to start changing our eating culture first and foremost, then half of the conditions people develop wouldn’t exist.  If we have a RISK tax (like a VAT but on processed sugar, processed oils and animal fats (twice the amount for corn fed), and sodium then we would have the money to provide the jobs for much of what you describe .  This would diminish Big Corp. that is lobbying like crazy to keep the cycle of unhealthy diet to preventable disease to specialist treatment and pharmaceutical dominance. Many in those businesses would need to be retrained -  ie wall Street types, health insurance employees as they would no longer be needed.  Doing this could lead the way to a National Corps .  By the way, could I make a lot of money being a patient advocate?  

  • DFDMD

    In the past, we had sort of a related social experiment, the doctor draft.  No, it was not “PC” because it only applied to males.  If you went to medical or osteopathic school up until around the end of the Vietnam conflict and were a man, you served the country for two years (after completion at least the PGY-1 year).  You might have been at a USPHS facility, merchant marine clinic, Indian reservation, prison hospital, underserved area clinic, NIH, or any branch of the military.  Your pay was below “market value”, BUT the medical education loans then available (so-called Health Profession Loans) allowed deferral of BOTH principle and interest through the two-year obligation and a year’s grace period afterwards.
    IF AND ONLY IF you were entering an area of perceived need (during the war, obviously Uncle Sam valued anesthesiologists, surgeons, and radiologists over pedictricians, for example), you could seek a “Berry Plan” deferment for residency training before serving, but you still had to serve.  BTW, those loans also allowed deferral of both principle and interest during your medical education and up to seven years of residency AND had subsidised interest rates to boot….
    Many of us dinosaurs learned as much or more during our obligated service as during our formal training.  When you are faced with some extreme medical challenge and the only helper is a 19 year old straight out of basic hospital corpsman school, you figure out in a hurry how to be more self-sufficient!
    Was it Yogi Berra who said “Deja vue all over again?”