Choosing Wisely is the health reform we need

Let me tell you about a possible paradigm-changing idea in the seemingly hopeless matter of controlling runaway healthcare costs—a topic that has far-reaching implications, not just for healthcare, but for our nation’s economy and vitality.

Organizations of doctors have decided to embrace common sense in the practice of Medicine.

Led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation and joined by many other medical societies, the Choosing Wisely movement aims to promote care that is:

  • Supported by evidence
  • Not duplicative
  • Free from harm
  • Truly necessary

Nine medical groups—with more coming on board soon—were asked to compile a list of 5 misused or overused tests. The American College of Cardiology listed these ground-breakers:

  • Cardiac imaging should not be performed routinely in patients without symptoms or high-risk.
  • Cardiac imaging should not be performed for routine follow-up in patients without changes in symptoms or signs.
  • Cardiac imaging should not be performed prior to low-risk surgery.
  • Echocardiograms should not be done to follow-up non-symptomatic patients with mild valve abnormalities.
  • Patients with heart attack treated with emergency stenting should have stents placed only in the culprit vessel.

These are not misprints. The leaders of American cardiology have gone on the record against nonsensical and wasteful — but some say “thorough” testing. Wow!

As a minimalist and (budding) master-of-the-obvious clinician, these proclamations of common sense make my heart sing. But that’s not all. Choosing Wisely isn’t just about smarter cardiology recommendations. (Although, if implemented, these heart recommendations alone would greatly reduce unnecessary healthcare costs.) Other medical societies have weighed in with equally ‘epic’ suggestions:

  • Radiologists recommend performing fewer head imaging studies for headaches and fewer chest CTs in the initial evaluation of suspected lung blood clots (PE).
  • Family doctors urge doing fewer MRIs for low back pain and prescribing antibiotics less aggressively for uncomplicated sinusitis.
  • GI doctors call for less repeat colonoscopies after an initial negative test, fewer CT scans of the abdomen and titration to the lowest dose of medicine to treat reflux.
  • Internists repeat the call for fewer MRI scans of the low back, avoiding head-imaging tests for simple faints, and echo the ACC recommendations to not do routine stress tests in low-risk patients.

This stuff is huge. We all know healthcare costs are spiraling out of control. Most agree that the reforms argued in front of the Supreme Court recently don’t address the issue of controlling costs. Government regulation tries to limit costs by covertly (or overtly) inserting itself in the doctor-patient relationship.

Effective healthcare reform will not come from the government.

Doctors must design and implement healthcare changes and reforms. Call us what you will, but we are the experts in medical diagnosis and treatments. We know what works and what doesn’t. We must be allowed to practice Medicine–not just follow protocols, or test and treat just to cover our butts. The corollary here, of course, is that we must be allowed to be human. What my favorite cyclist, Fabian Cancellara, says about cyclists holds true for doctors too: “We are not cyborgs, only men.”

That our thought leaders are now proclaiming–and social media is amplifying– the values of clinical judgment and targeted thoughtful diagnostic and therapeutic interventions represents a monumental sea change. Malcolm Gladwell writes about small yet obvious ideas that come to stick. I think Choosing Wisely has a chance. I hope it sticks like super glue.

Writing about this feels so good. Not just because my approach to the practice of medicine has come back in vogue, but because I care so much about the human aspects of our profession. Because it matters so.

John Mandrola is a cardiologist who blogs at Dr John M.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • Marc Frager

    The most overused test of all is the MOC exam of the ABIM. After at least 37 years of recertification, there is no data comparing the outcomes of age matched physicians who participate in MOC vs those who self-educate. And it is likely we will never see the data. What if there were no difference!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/AILWMPO444OUYFL4APWVYCPPCA Callie

    Choosing Wisely is a great start. It’s just common sense for healthcare reform to be initiated by those who bear the greatest responsibility for that care. However, I’ve seen for myself – and have heard some pretty shocking histories from professionals directly involved, related to this matter – that physicians are not as good as they should be about self-policing, sometimes not by a long shot. 

    Likewise, what appears to patients (and sometimes is) profit-centered arrangements between docs and pharma, or docs and bottom-line hospital admins, has only been addressed indirectly. It seems likely that if physicians’ associations had dealt vigorously with these problems way back when, and kept at it, it would be much easier now to prevent government meddling in areas it’s known not to be very good at. 

    From someone who empathizes strongly with both conscientious physicians and patients who are doing all they can for themselves, I have to ask: Can docs and their healthcare colleagues do what it takes to keep the professionals toeing the line? Otherwise, patient advocates will continue to press hard for the government to take the policing and/or guidance-counselor role; or, basically, whatever it takes to keep the average patient/insurance-payer from bearing the brunt of medical mess-ups. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alieta-Malwitz-Eck/565880983 Alieta Malwitz Eck

    Real common sense health care reform will come when physicians get back to providing real charity care apart from the expensive, bureaucratically top-heavy government Medicaid program. Non-government free clinics, staffed by volunteer baby boomers need to pop up in our communities. Doctors already provide common sense help for the poor in such clinics with the Federal Tort Claims Act protecting them from lawsuits, eliminating the pressure to order excessive testing.

    The one extra step needed to unleash the army of physicians from all specialties, would be for the state governments to add medical malpractice protection to the entire practice of each physician who donates four hours a week in or through such a facility. This could include surgery, anesthesiology, and obstetrics as well as primary and other specialty care.

    People helping people, one at a time without government interference, is the key to what ails our medical system. No entitlements, just care provided when care is needed.  Doctors return to being doctors, not expert coders who learn how to game the government systems in order to survive. Patients who are not poor can see the same physicians in their practices where cash is accepted as a fair price for good service. Excess testing will melt away as patients need to be convinced that the tests are warranted. And insurance needs to be reserved for the unexpected major medical events. never the routine. 

    Alieta Eck, MD
    President, AAPS
    http://www.aapsonline.org

  • Doc ForthePeople

    Is this the same as medical care for only the truly sick? Or does it mean that only the really rich will get high tech diagnostics to diagnose disease early when intervention will make the most difference? Does it mean that college football players will not get the MRIs right after an injury because those are not really medically necessary either? Rationing care but based on whose decision? What about the diseases whose basis is yet to 

  • cleverbyhalf

    Love the reference to Spartacus!

  • pritikin

    How about cutting back on procedures that do little or no good but dramatically drive up helathcare expenditures like angioplasty in patients with stable coronary artery disease. These cost tens of billions each year and do nothing to reduce the risk of having an MI or dying from CVD. How about less chemotherapeutic false hope for those with terminal cancers that at best delays dying by a few weeks so the patient and their families can suffer more while the oncologists and their support team get rich. And how about all the back surgeries that net-net accomplish nothing but enriching the orthopod and his/her minions.

    And why are diet caused asymptomatic ills like essential HTN treated by MDs at all when we know in most cases HTN can be eliminated far more safely and effectively by changing one’s diet and monitoring BP with a $50 BP device. Why does “health” insurance pay for MD office visits and drugs to treat HTN (and yet never cure it) while denying payment for dietary counseling that can potentially stop and reverse the disease process? So while the reforms being recommended are a step in the right direction there is still far more that could be done if the economic incentives to treat diet and lifestyle ills medically instead of dealing with the cause of the disease and providing patients with economic incentives to rely more on lifestyle changes rather than asking MDs to fix pathological processes with drugs and surgery.

  • JeffPT

    Dr. Eck you have some interesting ideas specifically about the malpractice coverage being added for MDs to donate the 4 hrs of time. I always say if people put as much effort into putting their butts on the nicest beaches once reaching retirement (401ks) as they did towards their future healthcare needs, the healthcare situation in this country would be far better off. That’s why I am a huge proponent in the concept of HSAs. But now let’s try to convince the gov to allow us to keep more of our earned income and pay less income taxes…! I believe big gov proponents spin that into being called “government expenditures”. See, all our money is first a belonging to the gov. When they establish randomly what portion is theirs and then a “loophole” allows us to keep more we are barraged by the media and politicians into believing we are getting away with thievery.

    • civisisus

      Nice job Jeff – you turned a topic that few other than zealots could channel into a political screed into something sounding very much like it.

      Please go look up participation rates in HSAs – not HDHPs, but the savings accounts – and how that breaks by factors like income, and get back to us. 

      Wait, no don’t bother getting back. Just try to catch up

  • http://twitter.com/PorterOnSurg Chris Porter MD

    This sentence in the middle of this post struck me: Effective healthcare reform will not come from the government.

    Help me with the history: isn’t Choosing Wisely the belated support, by professional organizations, of a few principles outlined in the Affordable Care Act? Was the ABIM leading on this initiative, or following? 

Trending