Take patients away from the overtreaters

A few months ago I was introduced to a gentleman who had been a corporate VP for employee benefits at a Fortune 100 company for many years.  I was impressed with his knowledge of health care.  He shared some of his experiences with company employees, who lived all over the country.

The company had a policy that when employees were informed they had a very serious medical condition, the company paid for a second opinion.  For example, when employees were told they needed a heart transplant, the company paid the cost for travel and a second opinion at the Mayo Clinic.  Mayo found that 40% of the transplants that had been recommended to employees were not medically necessary or appropriate.

The VP saw cases in which transplants were recommended for people who were going to die soon from cancer whether the transplant was done or not.

Sometimes hospitals and surgeons were extremely aggressive in promoting transplants that could not possibly be beneficial to the patients.  One hospital recommended a heart-lung transplant for a patient.  When the patient visited Mayo for a second opinion, it was discovered that neither a heart nor a lung transplant was indicated for the patient.  She left the hospital with no surgery.

Another employee was told he needed a heart transplant.  When the VP called the surgeon at a well-known institution to tell him that his company will pay for a Mayo second opinion, the surgeon said the patient shouldn’t fly on a plane in his condition.  In fact, the employee has just traveled on a plane to see the surgeon and was happy to go to Mayo for a second opinion. The second opinion revealed a small blockage that was successfully managed with a stent.

The VP said the team in his company that worked with Mayo had a wall of cards and notes from grateful employees.  The employees who were spared massive surgeries called the VP’s team members and thanked them over and over again.  The employees cried, the team cried, and so did the VP.

I’ve been working on overtreatment for a long time and have written about it in The Treatment Trap but this took my breath away.  The opportunity cost is profound when it comes to transplants.  Medically unnecessary transplants take life away from those who could die without a new heart.

So far, the work to shine a light on overtreatment is compelling and includes:

  • the “Top Five” list of good practices in primary care that lead to appropriate care, no more and no less, developed by the National Physicians Alliance, funded by the ABIM Foundation, and published in the Archives of Internal Medicine
  • the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely campaign whose message is that wise choices are integral to medical professionalism

We need to get to the high hanging fruit where real and immediate harm is occurring.   As for the former benefits VP, his approach has been to take patients away from the overtreaters.   I think Hippocrates would agree this is the right thing to do.

Rosemary Gibson led national quality and safety initiatives at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.  She is author of The Treatment Trap, Wall of Silence: The Untold Story of the Medical Mistakes that Kill and Injure Millions of Americansand the forthcoming book, The Battle Over Health Care: What Obama’s Reform Means for America’s Future published by Rowman & Littlefield. 

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • http://www.thehappymd.com/ Dike Drummond MD

    Thank you for this post Rosemary. It is so good to see reasonable guidelines with an expert consensus behind them that will help physicians stop the chronic overtesting and overtreating. Unfortunately … consensus on the top five lists be damned … some patients simply will not be satisfied with anything less than antibiotics for their cold !

    We keep breathing,

    Dike
    Dike Drummond MD
    http://www.thehappymd.com

  • Anonymous

    What the heck is the employer doing meddling in someone’s personal life!

    • Anonymous

      An employer paying all expenses for a second opinion at the Mayo Clinic — at the employee’s choice — doesn’t seem to me to be meddling.   In each of these three cases, the employees are grateful beyond words for not having to go through a transplant. 

  • http://twitter.com/JjrkCh Joleen Chambers

    Mayo care can vary like all medical institutions. Corporate executives’ experience is first class.  Great article.

  • Jamie Rauscher

    Good post.  Overdiagnosis can also be a problem.  Earlier diagnosis may not always lead to better outcomes and may in some cases cause patients harm: 
    http://www.healthjam.net/2011/11/is-ounce-of-prevention-worth-pound-of.html

  • Anonymous

    You are right… People’s minds have been “marinated” to believe more is better.  So, we need a post on how to take the antibiotics away.

  • Elle Gee

    I see potential for conflict of interest here. Whose to say that in less ethical hands, the “second opinion” is really just to keep from paying for expensive procedures and other care. I would want to choose where I go for a second opinion – and not be compelled to go where the company requires me to go. What sort of financial compensation does Mayo receive for these second opinions – are they paid a retainer fee – a bonus for every procedure they say is unnecessary – or just the ordinary consult fee? Sunlight is required.

    To be clear – I believe that this is a good idea – and that certainly there is far too much unnecessary care – but to imply that those giving the first opinion were doing so for financial benefit means one must at least consider that those giving the second would do so for the same reason – although receiving payment from a different source.

    On another note – I’m not in awe of the “famous” hospitals – I received less than remarkable care from Johns Hopkins. On the other hand the care I received from local community hospitals was far superior in many, many ways. I have no doubt that places such as Hopkins and Mayo do extraordinary work – they just don’t do ordinary particularly well, in my experience. And, they can’t survive on only the extraordinary. The regular patients are their bread and butter. Too bad they haven’t learned to treat the ordinary patient with as much attention, compassion and concern as the outliers.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Arnold-Wax/100000381145770 Arnold Wax

    We also have to find a way to stop the 10th, 11th and 12th lines of chemotherapy. Excessive and prolonged chemotherapy, which has little chance of response, and no chance of prolonging life, is simply prolonging an inevitability and providing false hope, and yes, unnecessary and wasteful expenses. When one hears the comment “its allabout the patient,” the translation is “its all about the money.”

  • Anonymous

    Another word for the group of clinicians that are characterized as overtreaters is physicians who refuse to accept that heir diagnosis and subsequent treatment is in the area of medical futility.  That is why physicians should endorse a second opinion in order to spare their patient from unnecessary harm and suffering.  Due to the exponential increase in health care costs, companies have to start endorsing the input from health coaches who has the time and the financial expertise to integrate medical information that has been generated, and thus, saving money for companies and preventing unnecessary and futile tests of employee.

Trending