How medications are like vehicles

I usually cringe when I see a pharmaceutical company ad on TV.  I think most pharma commercials do more harm than good.  The ads scare patients out of taking medications they need.

Actor: Do you have uncontrollable diarrhea?  I did, and then my doctor prescribed “No-More-Poop!”  Now I feel great and don’t have to worry about embarrassing accidents.

Commentator: Clinical studies done at a leading university prove that “No-More-Poop” cures 99% of patients with uncontrollable diarrhea.

Now, in a softer voice and with a rapid fire delivery.

Commentator:  In a small number of cases, patients treated with “No-More-Poop” died from bowel obstruction, lost their vision, experienced erectile dysfunction, and became psychotic.  If you experience any of these problems, stop taking “No-More-Poop” and see your doctor immediately.

It’s no wonder that after watching a television ad for medications, patients are too afraid to seek treatment for treatable diseases. On a rare occasion, I see a pharma ad that teaches about a disease process, not about a medication.  Disease oriented ads are helpful as they educate the public without pitching a product or scaring patients by highlighting unlikely side effects and risk.  The job of educating patients about side effects and risk belongs to the doc and the patient’s pharmacist.

Everything has side effects and risk.  While the FDA mandates that all FDA approved medicine’s side effects and risk be widely available to the public, no such warnings exist for the rest of the world.  Did you know that going to the grocery store has risk?  Over the years, I have treated multiple children who have fallen out of grocery carts and hit their head, adults who have slipped injuring their back or hips, and once, treated a women for a burn to her eye after she picked up a Jalapeño pepper and then wiped her eye with her hand.

If the FDA governed supermarkets and demanded that supermarket ads have fair balance and list the risk associated with shopping in their stores then Mr. Commentator, in a low voice with rapid fire delivery would say, “Shopping at Grocer ‘A’ has been associated with head injury, sprained backs, fractures of the spine and hip as well as injuries to the eye that may result in blindness.”

Can you imagine what auto commercials would sound like?  Have you ever read automotive safety statistics?  I have, and they are scary.  I know, medications are different then cars.

Are they?  When you get in the car, you strap on your seatbelt, follow the rules of the road, stopping at stop signs and red lights.  You watch out for the other guy, merge carefully, and check your mirrors at all times.

When your doc gives you a medication, he gives you rules of the road.  He tells you how and when to take it.  He tells you when to follow-up for a recheck.  The pharmacist should review the rules with you as well.  When we discuss possible side effects and risks it’s the same as pointing out where the dangerous pot holes, intersections, and merges are.  When we tell you how and when to take a medication, we are strapping on your seatbelt.  Following the rules of the road makes you journey safer.

If you are not confident that you know how to drive a car, don’t drive.  If you are not confident that you understand how to take your medication, ask your doc or pharmacist to review it with you until you are.  The car is a marvelous vehicle that can get you from point “A” to point “B” in relative safety.  Medications are vehicles as well, meant to get you from point “A” to point “B” in the best health they can.  Yes, they carry risk.  Everything does.

Stewart Segal is a family physician who blogs at Livewellthy.org.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • Anonymous

    Having worked in healthcare marketing, I can tell you that pharma companies would not use consumer advertising if it scared more patients away than it attracted. Overall, consumer advertising does drive sales.  Are you suggesting that pharma companies should simply not do it, or that government regulations should not have to mention the scary stuff and leave that to websites and health professionals to discuss?

    On another note, the government (not the FDA, however) does impose warnings on tobacco and alcohol products. It seems the goal there is precisely to drive people away from those products. Could the FDA intentionally be trying to scare people away from medicines, too?

  • http://twitter.com/livewellthy Stewart Segal

    I would like to see pharma refrain from medication specific advertisements all together.  Their money would be best spent doing disease state education, leaving medication decisions to the doctor and patient.  Disease state educational ads would help patient recognize that help can be found in their local doc’s office and take the wind out of the sails of those who attack pharma for over promoting products.

  • Anonymous

    While some pharmaceutical advertisements scare off a number of patients, it’s really important for patients who need care to seek out that care and then listen closely doctor’s (or pharmacist’s) directions. It is really important to not only describe to the patient the risks in particular medications, but also exactly how to use medication. If a patient over-consumes a medication or doesn’t consume enough and lands back in the hospital or at the pharmacy, it can cost the medical industry far more than is necessary and affordable. I read an article from OptumInsight about how the healthcare community needs to save money and confront patient compliance in terms of overconsumption of medicine. Here is the link: http://ignite.optuminsight.com/archive/the-real-remedy-medication-adherence/

  • http://twitter.com/medbillmistakes Robin Giangrande

    The ads most certainly drive sales or big pharma would not pay to produce or run them. Their purpose can be even more insidious. The ads are driving consumers to ask their doctors for prescriptions for BRAND NAME drugs. When is the last time you saw a television commercial for a generic or one that mentioned that the same drug could be obtained as a generic. The commentary about the risks contained in the ads are a red herring – most people don’t even hear them anymore – once you tell people enough times that they could possibly die from “anything,” and nobody they know or care about does, the warnings fall on deaf ears. All they see is the marketing images, logos and how much the company “cares” about them. 

  • susan popp

    Drug ads on TV and magazines should be banned just like alcohol and tobacco. They make patients go to their doctors and ask for meds they don’t need and doctors prescribe them because they are afraid to say no. The new drugs that come out are dangerous and many people are not aware of that. It’s all about $$$$ for Big Pharma. KARMA