The therapeutic value of touch in medicine

My wife has two world-class oncologists who help her manage her stage 4 lung cancer.  Both are excellent clinicians.  Yet their skills differ in one very important way.  Her radiation oncologist physically touches her a lot (in a good way of course!).  There are the touches on her arm, a hand on the shoulder, hugs, and of course a thorough hands-on physician exam.  Her medical oncologist not so much.

We all recognize the therapeutic value of touch.  Dr. Abraham Verghese, a Stanford physician and professor, at the 2011 Med 2.0 Conference, described the power of touch associated with the physical exam.  In the following scenario he describes an interaction with a chronic fatigue patient who came to him after being seen by many other physicians:

The patient was very voluble and kept talking as I began the physical.  I always begin my routine, my ritual with the patient’s hands…it seems natural to hold the hands.   I slip my figure to the radial pulse and then examine the fingers looking for cyanosis and clubbing….  As I began my routine, this talkative patient began to quiet down.   I had an eerie sense that the patient and I had slipped back into a primitive ritual…one in which I had a role and the patient had a role.

When I was done the patient said to me with some awe…I have never been examined like this before.   If this were true that was unfortunate since this patient had been examined by other physicians many times before.   Following the exam, I told the patient the same thing he had been told by other physicians, I don’t know what the problem is …but here’s what we will do.  I had earned the right to tell the patient this because of the examination.

Verghese believed that, unlike the other physicians seen by the patient, he had earned the right to diagnose the patient and expect the patient to accept and act on his findings.  Why? Because of the patient trust he had earned in part through the power of touch.

Turns out that there is scientific research to back up Verghese’s claim.  According to researchers, people are able to more accurately discern a wider range of feelings and emotion from touch than from gestures, expressions, and sometimes even words.  That’s because touch is the first language we learn.  Tiffany Field, PhD of the Touch Research Institute in Miami has found that benefits of touch seem to stem largely from its ability to reduce levels of cortisol, a stress hormone manufactured by the body.

Given the high degree of personal stress associated with a trip to the doctor, a lab test, or hospital visit, I suspect we could use a whole lot more touching, not less, as is the trend.  Verghese has a name for this trend – you know where clinicians gather around the computer and not the patient.  He calls it iMedicine, and it’s not a good thing.

Steve Wilkins is a former hospital executive and consumer health behavior researcher who blogs at Mind The Gap.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • Anonymous

    Not all of us like near strangers touching us when it is not a required part of the physical exam (I have no issues with a physcial exam as I understand the need for it). I would be really uncomfortable with touches on the shoulder, arm or worse yet, hugs from a person who is not my friend, but my physician.

    • Anonymous

      I agree with you.  I don’t particularly enjoy being touched by anyone other than people who are very close to me, like my husband, or siblings.  It’s unpleasant when my employees and acquaintances hug me, and I really dislike people who invade my personal space or touch me in any way other than a business-like handshake.  Being touched is highly stressful.

  • http://twitter.com/DutchBW Jan Taco teGussinklo

    I quite agree that physical contact is an important part of the art of Medicine. Probably the importance in Medicine is underestimated. It will be a challenge to overcome this in new modalities like eHealth and Robotics.
    Sorry, my column is in Dutch…
    http://www.dutchbuttonworks.com/2011/03/hartslag-meten-versterkt-vertrouwen/

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=553105686 Leslie Edwards

    Touch is not therapeutic unless the patient perceives it that way. To a patient who does not like touch, if they are crying from pain, what they want is to have their pain addressed, not their tears. Handing them a tissue is enough.

  • Steve Wilkins

    Certainly not everyone is comfortable with being touched in normal social situations.  But for someone faced with a life threatening medical condition such as that described in my post, a little compassion, empathy..whatever you call it…goes a long way from the patient’s perspective.  Admittedly “touch” may not have the same connotation for everyone…but once you need it you’ll never forget the experience.  By the way, if your doctors are the total strangers you make them out to be it unfortunate as there are a lot of very fine doctors out there.

    Steve Wilkins
    http://www.healthecommunications.wordpress.com     

    • Anonymous

      No, it’s not unfortunate that my physician is a near (note I did not say total) stranger, nor is he a lousy physician (as you seem to want to imply). I prefer a respectable professional distance in that type of relationship. We are not friends, we have a working professional relationship. I would say in fact that he is a better doc than the one who just assumes I want to be touched or don’t want to be touched as I pretty clearly communicate my preferences and he actually listens to them. Nor am I sure why you equate emapthy to physical contact. A person can provide empathy without providing unwanted physical contact. Sheesh, just acknowledge that not every patient wants to be treated in a specific way and that there are multiple beneficial types of physician/patient relationships. I am glad that you and your wife have found a method that you prefer but please don’t assume that all patients want or need that same type of relationship.

      • Steve Wilkins

        Sorry to connote quality with empathy.  Thanks for pointing that out.  

  • Doug Capra

    I agree with the article, and with the posted comments. People are different and need to be treated that way. But it always interests me that, when topics like this come up, one element that is almost always left out is this: gender. How does the gender of the doctor and the gender of patient affect this issue? Male doctor, female patient. Female doctor, male patient. Some gender doctor and patient. I’m not suggesting there’s anything wrong with any of these scenarios. But we know there are significant differences in gender perceptions. It just fascinates me that, the assumption often seems to be that this isn’t or wont’ be an issue. It can be. And for those patients for whom it may be a big issue, it can be mitigated if the doctors are aware, observant and responsive. It may even be an issue for doctors who feel uncomfortable dealing with certain genders. This elephant in the room topic needs to be addressed, especially when topics like “touch” come up.

  • Anonymous

    Beautifully said . Anybody ever realized that Jesus, in his time, did a great deal of touching to heal people? In my own view, this is perhaps the most important aspect that is forgotten in the medical field. I went to see a Family physicain once as a patient. After learning that I was a physicain , he barely touched me, then diagnosed me as  having BPH, which stayed in my records. ..The medical school need to put more emphasis on this subject…In my practice, I believe that is essentailly how I gained my patients confidence. They are willing to come from distance to see me. They do not mind waiting. Some of them do not even want to see my partner…

  • Anonymous

    I have one doctor who puts his hand on my shoulder when he leaves the room.  To me it’s a comforting gesture that the visit went well.  I suppose some might view this as unwanted familiarity.  It can be a fine line.

Trending