The secret to better patient care is time

Lets face it — the system of primary care medicine in the United States is broken. Even in Boston, the mecca of medicine, patients struggle hard to find an accessible doctor. And when they finally land an appointment, their well-intentioned internist, pediatrician or family physician often seems overworked, rushing from patient to patient, with little time to really listen to details.

As a primary care family physician for 20 years, I hear my colleagues saying, “I went into medicine to put the whole clinical picture together. I really care and want to know my patient — but the system doesn’t give me the time to do it!”

The basic issue is time. People really are beautifully complex, more than the sum of their organs. So patients don’t have isolated problems, but present to their family doctor with two or three (maybe as many as six!) problems that are often interconnected. They’ve stored up all these issues for their one 15- to 20-minute doctor’s appointment, which took a month to get. The patient feels rushed, the doctor feels rushed, and telling details are often missed.

When I was an island doctor in Maine for 10 years, I had more time with my patients. I had less technology at my fingertips and discovered something remarkable. Most diagnoses, even rare ones, can be made by asking open-ended questions and having the focus to listen very carefully to the finest details of the patient’s story. The subtle onset and timing of a wheeze, a fever, abdominal cramping — as symptoms weave and change over time, they leave a trail of diagnostic clues. As most seasoned doctors know, the patient’s story can narrow the diagnosis. Then a precisely chosen test or targeted referral to the best specialist can clinch the diagnosis and point the way toward treatment options.

A dedicated primary care doctor is trained to diagnose and treat up to 90 percent of patient problems without needing a specialist. But in today’s health care environment, with no time to get a detailed history, the trend is to quickly refer patients on to a specialist. This often starts a cascade of specialty consults focused on one organ at a time.

And how does that affect our clinical skills? By referring common health conditions too readily to specialists, both the general doctor and the specialist can diminish their skills. The generalist becomes less expert at caring for common problems, and the specialist, flooded by common issues that could have been addressed by a primary care physician, has less time to devote to the more complicated, rare conditions he/she are specifically trained to diagnose and treat. Ultimately, it costs the patient (and the health care system) more time and money.

From my experience, I believe that urging primary care doctors to spend more time with patients can not only provide better care across the board, but save patients’ time and the health care system money. The primary care doctor is uniquely positioned to put together a patient’s whole health picture by connecting the physical condition with the life stressors that often precipitate disease in the first place. Close follow-up, monitoring for changing symptoms, can make earlier diagnoses possible and help prevent treatment side effects.

At your next appointment, help your doctor see your whole health picture and keep him/her informed of ongoing changes. This can (and should) lead to better treatment and prevention of future disease. The system may be broken, but it’s not beyond repair.

Rick Donahue is a clinical instructor at Harvard Medical School with 20 years of experience delivering complete primary care. His private practice in Back Bay, MA, Personal Health MD is dedicated to providing comprehensive state of the art primary care. This article originally appeared in The Brookline Tab and is reprinted with the author’s permission.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JBSD6A2DCLSGWHGOWJKOR7YLYU mukesh

    We live in robotic era where 90% of Doctors and Patients
    have communication gap by all mean. The solution to the problem is EMR or EHR,
    filled with patient medical history from day one and also periodic medical checkup
    will be key factor in future.

    • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

      It goes beyond EMR….we are treated at the Cleveland Clinic the land of ground-breaking EMR’s….a good step up on a long stairway. I think Open Notes is another good step to take….communication, cooperation, and comfort in the exam room…..and what each side needs the most but will remain in shortage…time.

  • Dr Edwin Scott

    This problem isn’t that hard to figure out. In any business, work volume x price = revenue. When fees get cut, then to make the same revenue, one has to increase the volume. There are only so many hours in a day before a practice’s biggest expense, staff salaries, goes from time to time and 1/2 for overtime. So the solution, unless one wants a cut in pay, is to cram as many patients onto the schedule as possible and work like hell to get through before 5 PM. Myself and some of my colleagues are trying to address this issue (saveprimarycare.org), but until reimbursement works in a different way, the problem is only going to get worse. 

  • http://omshaantihospital.com Dr.Ajai Kumar Agarwal

    Doctor is said to be GOD on earth, comes true only when MALPRACTICE is abolished…………..

    • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

      Malpractice is being abolished….tort reform… lesser and fewer settlements. But to abolish it would mean carte blanche….that is just as unfair as frivolous lawsuits.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with all previous post, however, we all know this is an issue but we see it getting worse every second, so I ask you what is the answer?? Having more physicians, more time, as we continue to see both the rise in Healthcare cost and the rise of patients, is this even possible, this debacle will worsen unless there are changes. Is having the government come in and control our practice out of the question, do we want Uncle Sam to telll us how to practice, as we see in Europe, Canada and even Mexico. I believe through cost of Rx, technology, expansion, staffing, salaries, etc,. this is all part of the reason why we are sitting where we are. We need to get back to our grass roots as a whole nation, make time for patients, treat patients effectively and prudent, its not all about who has the nicest toys or who makes the most money, but sometimes thats they way it seems.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steve-Barnaby/100000621362236 Steve Barnaby

    Until the system is transformed from an episodic pay-for-procedure  system to a continuum of care pay- for- performance system, doctors and patients will find themselves at loggerheads and the American health care system will remain less than it could and should be. 

    • Dr Edwin Scott

      This is true. As it is right now, I get paid about the same if I do a good job or a bad job. I would love to be on a pay-for-performance system. Maybe then it wouldn’t seem like I work on an assembly line like it is now. If I got paid for emails and handling things by phone instead of making people come in the office so I can bill for an office visit, that could cut everybody’s costs — mine, the employer’s, and the patient’s

      • http://www.twitter.com/alicearobertson Alice Robertson

        Pay per performance sounds wonderful….what happens to the hopeless cases that will not be worth your time? Will the really dedicated doctors take the risks for less pay?

  • http://twitter.com/countryjane jacqui peacock

    the nhs in the UK is under seige by the overwhelming flood of EU migrants, who either come through the non existant borders or just drop in for medical care. Whilst my friend is in Spain where she lives during the winter. Shehasto have a card to say that she can be treated. This card is numbered so that the Spanish Goverment can reclaim all mediacl costs. Why does this not exist in the UK or is it that the so called goverment does not have the ability to make this work

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Randy-Dalbow/1280255721 Randy Dalbow

    How can you “urge” primary care docs to spend more time?  We “PCP’s” are only able to survive nowadays as employees of a huge WRVU driven corporation. The days of the small office with personalized care are hopelessly gone. We need to be paid to think and spend time but unfortunately we are not.  Show me how someone is paid and I’ll show you how they will act.

  • Rob Suykerbuyk

    Two basic thoughts.  One to Randy.  Primary care is not lost but it is sure getting squeezed.  This leads to the second and to Mr_Doc.  Its true that new money is not likely to flow into US healthcare as cost are already too high.  The limitation isn’t on how many healthcare dollars are in the system but how those dollars are being spent.
    Right now if you as a PCP spend 15 min, 30 min or 50 min the payment is basically the same.  So the system incentives brief visits with high volume.  This has not significantly changed for a decade.  Yet healthcare cost have skyrocketed.  So where is all the money going?   One word, procedures.  The system must stop valuing sticking a defibrillator under someone’s skin vastly more then the time, effort and expertise that is required to steer patients through healthier disease management and prevention.  

    Randy and others, if you are really afraid that “personalized care is hopelessly gone”.  Please visit saveprimarycare.org to help reform the system that we are all complaining about.

  • http://twitter.com/3GDoctor David Doherty

    With many Doctors finding the prospect of creating more time for patients to be unfeasible (for a variety of reasons) I think it’s time to take lessons from clinical leaders who have introduced validated tools (http://medicalhistory.com) that improve the effectiveness of Doctor/Patient communication. 

    Check out the published work of Dr John Bachman MD, Professor of Primary Care, Mayo Clinic: 
    http://vimeo.com/12523450
    While it’s obviously very disruptive to reframe the consultation process from one that requires a Doctor to TAKE a history into one where patients can effectively GIVE their history, we’ve found that it’s very much a change for the good and the patient/provider benefits have been well documented in the following published paper: 

    http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/early/2010/06/01/mcp.2010.0145

  • http://twitter.com/HealthChamp Ida Schnipper

    Totally agree with the concept. Individuals are often intimidated by office staff and don’t state upfront that they need a longer appointment. There should be better alignment between the care the physician would like to deliver and how the office staff executes that vision.

  • Anonymous

    Rick,
    While I like what you’re saying on the one hand I can’t help but think that you’re hopelessly out of touch with reality. Spending more time with patients may certainly be a good concept and one that the vast majority of PCP’s (including myself) would love to do, but isn’t this a bit naive and simplistic? It sounds like you’ve hardly worked in the real world recently that would cause you to make such a statement. Do you know what it’s like juggling the pressures of a busy clinic, the demand for impeccable documentation with poor reimbursement necessitating higher volumes and patients who have countless, complicated medical issues? Of course, we would all love to spend more time with patients, but there are real-world limitations that prevent that. How many patients do you see by yourself on a typical clinic morning at Harvard?

  • http://profiles.google.com/molly.ciliberti Molly Ciliberti

    How sad and bizarre that we have brought everything down to a common denominator money. We are really talking about money here, not time or patient care. If we had a single payer healthcare system with all insured and the government as the payer and we acknowledged that our goal is health not sickness (as in doing procedures to treat illness) and invested our time and energy into prevention we might just win the battle. As long as money is the key player, we are doomed to waste, frustration, greed and poor health.

  • Pat Tokarz
  • Anonymous

    Time is essential because it gives the needed opportunity for the physician and the patient to form an ethical interaction.  Based on this interaction, the cornerstone principle of medical ethics (first do no harm) leads to a diagnosis and subsequently treatment without subjecting the patient to unnecessary pain and suffering through needless tests.  The wholistic approach by the physician toward the patient resonates with the wholistic definition of health.  Time reveals the physiological, psychological and social of the patient.  Thus, referral of the patient to a specialist would serve th patient better because his primary physician was able to identify a health problem and not a medical case.

  • Anonymous

    Rick:  Hmm, I see you provide “functional nutrition consults” with various lab tests to find the “root causes of chronic illness” - for a fee.   I wonder what roots you recommend based on what quality of evidence.