Family medicine is the kind of revolution we want to join

by Christina Palmer

It never surprised me when my medical school classmates said they would “never do family medicine.”

I knew exactly how they felt: why would we choose to go into a field where physicians are undervalued, underpaid, buried under administrative paperwork, and where patients do not get the time or attention that they need?

Despite the warnings against it, I am pursuing family medicine as a career. And I am not alone: more medical students are doing the same — the numbers matching in family practice went up 11% from last year.

Why? Because we know primary care needs to be better and we want to help change it.

Primary care challenges us to master the full breadth of medical knowledge. With humility, intelligence, and an appreciation for physical, emotional, and spiritual health, more medical students are aspiring to be complete physicians for their patients. Primary care is difficult to access in our current system, and patients want a doctor who understands them and can be “their” doctor.

The residency interview trail provided me with an opportunity to talk with leading family physicians across the country. As I went through this process, it became clearer to me that family medicine is on the brink of an exciting revolution. There is an unsaid manifesto in family medicine that motivates many of us to join the field, and it includes the following:

1. Change. Family medicine will be leading the implementation of vitally needed changes ahead. As primary care becomes central to our healthcare system, family physicians will be part of new and more effective models of care, such as the patient-centered medical home (modeled by systems like Kaiser Permanente and Geisinger), accountable care organizations, and the growing numbers of direct-pay practices popping up across the country.

2. Prevention. The focus of our healthcare system must shift away from costly procedures and treatments and towards simple and cost-effective lifestyle changes to prevent many of our modern afflictions (cancer, heart disease, obesity). Primary care physicians are leading the effort to emphasize prevention over cure.

3. Innovation. New technology and social media tools have the potential to radically improve communication, medical treatment, and patient-education. While the current model is failing in many ways, primary care is thirsting for new ideas and innovations to facilitate their work (such as virtual doctor visits and smartphone apps to monitor patients’ blood sugars and weight).

4. Relationships. Family physicians create and sustain the health habits of our country through the relationships they cultivate with individuals, families, and communities. Despite the exponential growth in technology, effective doctoring starts with the basic human-to-human relationship, and changes happen through these relationships.

5. Health-equity. Family physicians are deeply committed to caring for vulnerable and underserved populations. Our challenge lies in designing a system that provides accessible, equitable, and affordable health care to all people, from inner city refugee populations to remote Native American reservations.

6. Value and centrality to system. As the value given to primary care increases, family medicine will no longer be a field people go into because they don’t have high enough board scores to take the “R.O.A.D. to success” (Radiology, Ophthalmology, Anesthesiology, Dermatology). Rather, family medicine will be what medical students go into because they are at the top of their class. They are drawn by the responsibilities and challenges of handling a medical career central to the healthcare system.

7. Teamwork. Family physicians get to interact with a large team of people to improve patient and population health: nurse practitioners, physician assistants, health educators, policy-makers, researchers, nutritionists, physical therapists, and more.

Through consistent and long-term relationships with patients, primary care physicians see changes over time, determine when to refer patients to a specialist, and provide preventive treatments that limit future costly procedures and hospitalizations. The entire medical system relies on them.

Many of us came to medical school driven by ideals and passion. Family medicine allows us to transform our idealism into reality. That’s the kind of revolution we want to join.

Christina Palmer is a medical student who blogs at Prescribing Yoga.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • mdstudent31

    Great post! Reform payment, reform the RUC. 11% increase is good but until we achieve at least 40-50% that stay in primary care, it is nowhere near enough.

    Join us in the #FMRevolution

  • http://www.pafp.com Molly Talley

    “Family medicine allows us to transform our idealism into reality.” Wow, Christina, fabulous post! I hope that every medical student interested in Family Medicine hears you and makes their own connection to the “revolution”. It’s real. The future of the specialty, and indeed the health of this nation, is in good hands with leaders like you stepping up to the plate. Thank you!

  • family practitioner

    Oh to be young and idealistic.
    Reminds me of myself 20 years ago.
    I hope you do not become disillusioned like I have.

  • Mark

    1. I have Kaiser insurance. Love it. When I have a problem, I call the appt. hotline, explain the problem, and they book with a specialist. At these medical homes, your “FM doc” is the nurse who mans the booking phone.

    3. Have fun trying to get paid for your virtual doctor visit. Blood glucose monitors have been around for years.

    4. When you’re part of a medical home, as you advocate in #1, your PMD changes all the time. I’ve had three different FM docs in the past 10 years, just because that is who the appointment-hotline nurse books me with when I call.

    5. Wait, how are you going to take care of poor people in a direct-pay practice like you suggest in #1? Why don’t you take their medicaid? What do you mean they can’t call for an appointment because the model depends on everything being done by computer? Ever heard of the digital divide?

    6. Why would top medical students go in to family medicine when it is also a job that apparently can be done by NPs and PAs, who have a fraction of our education and training? That makes no sense.

    7. Yes, unfortunately the FM doc has become the paperwork bitch of the medical system. I don’t see why that would be a reason to go into it.

    • RichmondDoc

      Christina–great post, and I am glad to see such enthusiasm to be part of out profession.

      Mark–Christina doesn’t need my help and addressing your comments, but here are some thoughts:

      1) that model of direct referrals to a specialist is bad medicine, and I would not be surprised if Kaiser revisits the policy once the new ACO regulations are fully in play. Family Medicine and other primary care docs will be increasingly emphasized.

      3) one can already code and bill for virtual visits, but insurance contracts often don’t reimburse them. As part of saving costs, and as part of innovating practice, once we can get insurers to understand that paying $25 for an e-visit vs. $50 for an in-person visit then I think this will shift.

      4) if your practice changes docs on you all the time, then they need to rethink their scheduling. PCMH models should emphasize continuity of care as well as access. For better access, some cross-coverage is needed, but the intent would be lasting relationships. Your issues with your practice’s policy doesn’t mean the PCMH idea is a bad one.

      5) There are low-cost direct-pay practices that can be quite affordable. Also, a PCMH can take Medicaid–although computer scheduling will become the preferred model, phone calls will still be part of doctor/patient communications.

      6) It is very easy to do bad primary care…much harder to do good primary care. I do not have any fear that NPs and PAs will take my job: my training and skills as an MD are very different from theirs. I was an honors graduate from med school, and never questioned my interest in Family Medicine…and I don’t question it now.

  • Tpouw

    Hat off to you for the idealim and enthusiasm. Ideally, all you said, if implemented, would bring the desire outcome. Nevertheless, we live in the real world, where policy changes, no matter how beneficial it’s impact on society, would not happen unless the key and leading groups are incentivised

  • Steve

    Enthusiastic idealist – there are worse things to be called. Make a difference in one life, one interaction at a time. Go for it, Christina.

  • ninguem

    Usually the people talking the loudest like this in medical school are the ones who end up with the ritzy suburban botox and bariatrics cosmetic practices in ten years.

    • pj

      Ha ha, but ouch! Niguem and Mark make good points… sad but often true.

      However, didn’t G B Shaw say ,”Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.”

  • Dave Chase

    German philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer, “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

    Hats off to you being ahead of the curve. Ignore the “Preservatives” (i.e., those protecting the status quo) if you want to effect change. All the studies I’ve seen that compare health costs and outcomes by country or county show a clear correlation. The higher the percentage of people who have a “medical home”, the better the health outcomes (and the lower the costs are). Eventually the gov’t will realize this but it will start with individuals and business. I wrote about a related topic “Do it yourself health reform” at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-chase/do-it-yourself-health-ref_b_787214.html if you want to see how some businesses are taking matters into their own hands.

    • http://www.prescribingyoga.com Christina

      Dave,

      Thank you so much for your comment and for the link to your article — it is excellent!

      Christina

  • http://nostrums.blogspot.com Doc D

    I’m having deja vu. Back in the late 70′s, when I was in training, there was great enthusiasm for family practice, and I had a number of friends who were just as committed to this way of practicing medicine, looking forward to providing care for underserved smaller cities in my state.

    After twenty years, only one was still doing it. The others had moved to the big cities, or gone into a second residency.

    I’m not sure we’ve set up the right environment for both patient care and career satisfaction. It sounds like we’re re-cycling the old ideas, and not changing the system that caused it to wither.

  • http://www.BocaConciergeDoc.com Steven Reznick MD

    Best of luck. Live your dream. Provide longitudinal care. Don’t end up pushing paper in a patient centered medical home or ACO where others do the hands on contact and report to you.

  • tpouw

    Well, I have to continue my post as I was accidentally terminated earlier during my last entry… As a 24 -year practicing general internist, I am intimately aware of all the problems that we face so I would not belabor anyone here. To ignore the “Preservatives” (i.e., those protecting the status quo) would be cathartic but would not bring about real change.
    From what I can see, the future model of ACO, Patient-Centered-Medical Home, etc. all look good but untried. Yes, it will bring down the income of your ROAD colleagues if that would be your goal of getting even. If successfully implemented, they would certainly change the landscape of American healthcare delivery but I am afraid until the tremendous lobbying influence of the insurance, pharmaceutical and hospital sectors are curtailed, they will just become your new ACO employers. That, I am afraid would be worse!

  • http://www.davisliumd.blogspot.com Davis Liu, MD

    Do what you love. When you join a practice, be choosy. It’s not just family medicine, but all of primary care that needs the best and brightest medical students. I enjoy what I do in primary care and know I’m incredibly lucky. Good luck in your residency and your future career!

    http://davisliumd.blogspot.com/2009/12/why-medical-students-should-chose.html

  • http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-chase/do-it-yourself-health-ref_b_787214.html Dave Chase

    Tpouw brings up the elephant in the room on PCP compensation. That is, the *assumption* that addressing inadequate compensation for the PCP has to come out of the hide of specialists. Unfortunately, the “Preservatives” have taken the “divide & conquer” strategy pitting PCPs vs. Specialists when the place increased PCP comp should come out of is what I call the “Insurance Bureaucracy Tax” of at least 40%. Read this piece by Garrison Bliss, MD – http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-garrison-bliss/health-care-reform-irony_b_377508.html. It was written before the new health law and fortunately what they were advocating for in that article was successful. In 2014, this little-reported aspect of the law should greatly expand the adoption of what Bliss’ org has pioneered. Click on the link in my name above and that article highlights some of this plus it links to my “health insurance’s bunker buster” piece for more.

    Somehow health care has become synonymous with health insurance. Insuring primary care is like insuring lunch. You know you’re going to need it. You know you can afford it. Why on earth would you pay a third party to pay the restaurant on your behalf, adding overhead and taking a big chunk out of the money you pay—and because of the process, have to wait a week to get a table and then have only 10 minutes to eat? [This analogy is thanks to Qliance's investor.]

    Dr. Bliss had a choice: Did he want to work for insurance companies or his patients? They’ve taken the notion of concierge medicine to the masses. With an avg payment of $65/mth that covers everything from urgent care to primary care and doesn’t charge for x-rays or first fill Rx, they have no pre-existing condition restrictions they’ve shown the way. The cost of their fee (again, totally outside of the insurance model) plus a low cost “wrap around” is less than what taxpayers pay for Medicaid patients, private employers pay for conventional health insurance, etc. Their “waiting room” is an oxymoron as it’s empty most of the time. I only saw one person in it when I was there and it was a family member waiting for someone in an apptmt. They also have patients who hit hard times and they don’t kick them out if they can’t pay the full fee for awhile.

    The kicker is Qliance and practices like it have shown they are reducing by 40-80% the most expensive facets of healthcare (e.g., ER visits). This is that I call “Do it yourself health reform.” Entrepreneurs doing what they do best…coming up with better and more affordable offerings that disrupt the status quo.

    PCPs and aspiring PCPs should be aware of the fact that there was once a day when they could sell their practices upon retirement as their “retirement plan”. A good friend of mine values practices health systems acquire. He said it’s a night and day difference on their valuation if they are insurance-based (essentially they value any real estate they own, their trained staff and some referral value) versus retainer-based. His assessment is that the value of a retainer-based practice is dramatically higher (note that Qliance is venture-backed whereas I doubt there’s a VC in the country who’d invest in an insurance-based PCP practice).

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/chasedave Dave Chase

    If you need any more evidence on why it’s a disaster financially for a PCP to work for insurance companies, the NY Times has an article on a PCP who can’t give away his practice and has seen his income cut by 2/3. Much better to answer to patients than insurance companies if you want to be a PCP and want to control your destiny and also have some financial security.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/23/health/23doctor.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

  • Jameson

    Isn’t “leading family physician” an oxymoron?

  • Kevin

    Christina,

    I found your article inspiring. I’m two years out of psychiatry residency, and am enjoying my unique role in the military (working with Marine Infantry), but I’ve been increasingly drawn to primary care and am considering a second residency in Family Medicine. And don’t let the naysayers bring you down..the world needs MORE dreamy-eyed idealists these days, not less.

  • gioacchino aj patuto,MD

    family practice is alive and well!!! i have been and still am practicing in 3rd world. the 1st question—-can you do family practice?????
    i love it and continue to do peds, ob-gyn, dermo, infectious disease, small surgeries, etc, etc…..
    the american beaurocratic system would never permit this!!!!
    the problem has always been—-politics!!!
    i went to school to practice medicine, not, medico politics!!!

  • http://www.billyrubinsblog.org Billy Rubin

    Hi Christina–

    Apologies in advance for being the fly in the ointment. It’s a great essay. I’m excited for you as you begin your career, and I think all those who find their calling in primary care are worthy of great respect, but there’s a difference between primary care and Family Medicine. The former is a noble calling, the latter, increasingly an outmoded (dare I say “bad”?) idea.

    When my 3rd- and 4th-year medical students ask me what I think about such-and-such a specialty, I respond honestly that no specialty is “better” than another, there’s drawbacks and plusses to all and it depends on what you like in medicine. But I also add that FM is an exception, and I can’t see a justifiable reason anymore why it’s a path worth pursuing over IM, Peds, or OB/GYN separately.

    Think about it: separately, those three residencies combined take TEN YEARS to complete. But somehow the leaders of FM residencies seem confident in being able to say they can provide competency in these specialties in a three-year program that is typically not nearly as rigorous as these other specialties. (I realize that the OB/GYN component isn’t the same in FM so it’s not a pure apples-to-apples comparison, but still you’re talking about squishing a lot of residency-years into the relatively light fare of FM training.) This is happening at a time when medicine is getting more and more technically complex, with a greater number of diagnostic tests and medications that a practitioner has to stay on top of. Just in my little subspecialty of Infectious Disease, there are two areas where some general ID people won’t tread because of how rapidly the field changes (HIV and Transplant). How can someone stay on top of all the goings-on, read all the literature, attend an occasional professional meeting, and do it competently for both kids and adults and pregnant women? I am skeptical that it can be done well, and yes, I think that holds true for Med/Peds programs as well, although I do think they get better training and are often higher caliber residents.

    FM made sense when there used to be lots of small, rural communities that couldn’t support multiple subspecialists, but the vast majority of Americans now live reasonably close to some metropolis and can easily find both pediatricians and internists within reach. Why anyone would want to see someone with less training as their doc is beyond me. By all means, be one of those docs out on the front lines, and take that great idealism you’ve got to your patients…just choose between kids and adults, is all I’m saying.

    One last, picky point: the fact that there was an 11% bump in the match numbers really doesn’t mean anything until you see a trend over several years. Gotta be circumspect about those stats.

  • Black Bile

    With all due respect to infectious disease, which was the specialty of the professors in medical school I respected most, I would just like to point out a small fact here: The average person does not have HIV or need a transplant. The average person has asthma and depression. We don’t need more specialists. We need more doctors who can handle the problem without referring. We need fewer predatory lawyers and bloodsucking administrators. We need fewer fingers in the pie.

    You don’t need to be a small rural community to not be able to support a bunch of subspecialists. Our entire nation as a matter of fact cannot support a bunch of subspecialists. This hyperdivision and loss of general competence in medicine is at the core of our ridiculous costs. Costs have increased by an order of magnitude since the days of “small rural communities” — has “health”? No. So why so many specialists? Hint: It is not out of need.

    What has increased is the number of human beings who only stick a camera in someone’s rear end (which does not, contrary to popular belief, require six years of postgraduate medical education) and make $400,000 per year.

    Yes, it takes “ten years” to finish all three of those residencies. Good thing for the attendings who get to write two sentences at the end of a five page note.

    Please, do not attempt to propagate any further the notion that the family doctor is dead. If the family doctor truly dies, it will be the day American medicine goes down the toilet, and your prestige and sense of self importance will follow soon thereafter.

  • http://www.billyrubinsblog.org Billy Rubin

    Dear “Black Bile,”

    Where to start? I guess I like your hot-tempered reply even though it seems wrongheaded, and you aim your verbal howitzers at me when I think they should be directed elsewhere. I s’pose this will all come across as further indication of my “prestige and sense of self importance,” but I’ll take a crack at some of the more egregious elements in your attack.

    First, let’s get something straight: you have an identity crisis, Dr. Bile, because you aren’t “Black,” but rather, “Yellow.” A quick review of the Theory of Humors confirms that Yellow Bile is angry and bad-tempered, while Black Bile is despondent. You clearly exhibit the former qualities rather than the latter, so strike one. Interestingly, I too often assume that tone of Yellow Bile, thus my internet nom-de-plume of Billy Rubin. You can feel free to check out my blog (www.billyrubinsblog.org) and decide whether I’m really an adversary or not–my sense is that we have much more in common than you think.

    Anyway, I think it’s pretty clear from my remarks that I’m not defending the top-heavy subspecialist system that’s currently in place. Far from it: I come right out and say that primary care is a noble calling, yet you go about attacking me for implying that we need more subspecialists. My point was that FM isn’t synonymous with primary care, and I tried to put forward ideas to Christina why I think she should carefully consider her options. Internal Medicine is hard and complicated; so is Peds. It takes time to learn these disciplines–indeed, my sense is that IM residencies could stand to be a little longer than their current three-year path, which hasn’t changed in decades even though diagnostics and therapeutics are orders of magnitude more complicated.

    Take, for instance, your reference to depression, which you use as a foil against such incredibly “rare” diseases as HIV. Forty years ago, depression was treated more or less with any or all of the following: talk therapy, drugs like thorazine or the class of drugs called “TCAs,” and shock therapy. Now there are SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, dopamine reuptake inhibitors like buproprion, atypical antipsychotics, occasional benzodiazepines, and some other assorted oddballs whose mechanism isn’t known like trazodone and mirtazapine. That’s a whole boatload of drugs to learn, plus their interactions with other meds or other foods (hold off those tasty blue cheeses among many other culinary delights while you’re on the seligiline!)…and have I mentioned the herbals that health-conscious patients take that can alter the metabolism of these drugs?

    That’s a lot to learn, “Black,” and that’s just one disorder. Take kids into the picture and you’ve got a whole different set of dosing issues, indications for treatment, and pathophysiology. Plus you’ve got to be on top of just the routine stuff that people need for “health maintenance,”—in adults, issues ranging from job or marital stress to dementia screening and home safety evaluations, in kids…a whole different ballgame. How anyone could stay on top of all that stuff competently is, well, let’s just say I think it’s well nigh impossible. It’s hard enough to be a general internist or pediatrician today, much less cover both specialties. Plus, as we’ve already noted, there’s an OB component to FM training, which means even less time to train in the former specialties.

    Why you are so wedded to the concept that there must be a doc who takes care of both kids and adults, rather than one who acknowledges the inherent impossibility to do that competently and so chooses one or the other, is puzzling to me. It would require the absolute most driven members of a med school class to have a chance at succeeding at it—yet the students I have seen considering FM since I was but a pup in med school have been, for the most part, very earnest and not especially driven people. I like many of them and would be delighted to talk to them about my life if it came to that, but I would trust essentially none of them with my medical issues.

    Maybe Christina will make it work out as a Family Doc. I like her idealism and commitment (and yep, I also like yours as well!—though I’m not fully clear on where you’re at in your career). That said, I think it’s a very tough row to hoe, and I’m humbly suggesting that maybe if she focuses just a bit while still remaining a generalist, she’ll do better by her patients.

    Self-importantly though with the best of intentions, Billy

  • Black Bile

    Billy,

    I am utterly humbled. As you may have imagined, I was ashamed of myself soon after replying to your post.

    My training is haphazard (PGY 0.5) but decidedly about to enter FM. With my own doubts intact I scan the internet hungry for hope. Of course I respect your field and feel indeed we are not true enemies.

    I do long for simpler times but your points are very well taken.

    The fact is I hope I can make a positive difference in the world with the training I am about to embark upon — somehow, in this ridiculous world.

    Thank you for understanding my ire, and indeed with best hopes,
    Yellow.

Trending