Does being a disadvantaged applicant affect my medical school application?

When applying to medical school, the American Medical College Application Service (AMCAS) asks aspiring physicians if they would like to be considered “disadvantaged” applicants or not.

Many premedical students find themselves troubled by this question and wonder, what does it mean to be disadvantaged? How does being a disadvantaged applicant affect my medical school application? According to the information American Association of Medical Colleges, the organization that provides the AMCAS application, “disadvantaged status is self-determined.”

Okay … so how is an applicant to know?

AMCAS suggests that it may be appropriate for those from medically underserved areas or those of low socioeconomic backgrounds to apply as disadvantaged applicants. AMCAS however, fails to advise those who fall into neither category. For example, a medical school applicant may have faced long-term adversity that has nothing to do with living below the poverty line. Learning disabilities, or discrimination due to sexual orientation or gender identity may diminish an applicant’s educational opportunities. Being an immigrant or learning English as a second language may also be a significant obstacle to academic enrichment.

Each medical school has its own policies for how it views disadvantaged applicants. Students that seek this status are asked to provide an additional essay on the AMCAS explaining why they consider themselves to be disadvantaged. This information may be useful in helping an admissions committee understand the broader context of an applicant’s background. If the goal of identifying disadvantaged applicants is to provide admissions committees with a more holistic picture, then extraordinary circumstances of adversity are equally as valid as financial disadvantages.

As you can see, the vague nature of self-determined disadvantage creates unnecessary confusion for medical school applicants. Search “disadvantaged status” and “ AMCAS” and you will find yourself on a wild-Google chase for the answer. Unfortunately, many students end up consulting websites like the Student Doctor Network, where premeds with questionable motives may discourage those who feel disadvantaged from claiming this status for a “leg up.” The discussions that take place on these sorts of websites can be quite unproductive and demeaning towards others’ personal struggles.

If, for example, the AMCAS is only aiming to identify educationally disadvantaged (e.g. being the first/only person in a family to graduate college) and financially disadvantaged (e.g. being raised in poverty) applicants, then questions on the application should be more explicit, and one’s status should be easily determined without any confusion. Medical school applications are costly and time-consuming. Applicants should not have to consult third-party resources to interpret what AMCAS may or may not mean by being “disadvantaged.”

Jennifer Adaeze Anyaegbunam will be starting medical school this August. She is currently a student of Narrative Medicine at Columbia University and blogs at Chick Lit MD.com.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • http://hokiemd.blogspot.com Christopher Bayne

    The one thing everyone needs to know about AMCAS (and ERAS, etc.), is that if you put something in the application, you better be willing to provide evidence for it and stand behind your application.

    If you think you are disadvantaged and have evidence or a story to support it, then check the box in your application. Just know that disadvantaged doesn’t mean that life has treated you unfairly. Everyone has an unfair story to tell.

  • Jim

    The situation is for Political Correctness .

  • Ac

    As with college admissions, there is a good sized bonus for being a non-Asian minority.

    http://bit.ly/dN0Tjg:

    “In fact, the AAMC posts offical grids showing how much easier it is to get into medical school for Non-Asian Minorities (NAMs) than for overall applicants. For example, 32.4% of “self-identified” NAMs get accepted to medical school with 3.00 to 3.19 GPAs and MCATs of 21-23, while only 13.4% of overall applicants get in with the same credentials. For applicants with 3.40 to 3.59 GPAs and 24-26 on the MCAT, 67.1 of NAMs get in versus 27.5% of the overall applicants (and somewhat less for Whites/Asians, of course).”

  • ninguem

    I’m confused.

    AMCAS says “disadvantaged status is self-determined”……..

    …….and then later in the post, as well as comments, there is the demand that applicants PROVE disadvantaged status.

    It’s either self-determined or it’s not.

    If you have to prove your disadvantaged status to the satisfaction of another party, then it’s not self-determined.

    • http://hokiemd.blogspot.com Christopher Bayne

      No one said anything about proving disadvantage to the “satisfaction of another party.” Disadvantaged is, as AMCAS says, self-determined. But you better be able to talk about your thought process behind the decision to check the “disadvantaged” box. Being able to talk about your application, your life, and how the two intersect is not proving anything to anyone–other than you spent the time to reflect on your life. Introspection is a important quality in medicine.

      My second point was that if you say you are disadvantaged, you need to compare your circumstances to other people. If half of the people interviewing you have experienced something like you have, then you probably aren’t truly disadvantaged.

      I probably didn’t do a good job of summarizing my argument in my original comment: Applicants need to think hard and long about their application, and they need to be able to explain their thoughts. The bottom line is this issue is less about proving disadvantage status than it is proving you think before you act, which is, after all, a critical element of good doctoring.

      • ninguem

        I do FAA pilot exams.

        The pilot’s demographic descriptions. Sex. As in male or female. By FAA standards
        http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/designees_delegations/designee_types/ame/media/mcspt.pdf

        “The sex is what is stated by the applicant even if there is anatomical evidence to the contrary.”

        The pilot says he’s female, he’s female. Genotype and phenotype do not count. You don’t have a say in the matter.

        THAT’S “self-determined”.

        “Each medical school has its own policies for how it views disadvantaged applicants.”

        That’s NOT “self-determined”, in plain English.

Trending