Legal tobacco and illegal marijuana are historical accidents costing billions

“What do you think of medical marijuana?” my mother, who has never smoked a thing in her life, of the tobacco or cannabis variety, asked me one day as we drove through beautiful upstate New York woods.  We had just passed a sign saying “We will destroy your crops,” with a marijuana leaf beneath. “It has its place,” I said.  “No reason to be against it.” “But isn’t marijuana a terrible substance?” she asked. “No worse than tobacco or alcohol,” I told her my honest opinion.

When I started on the wards and saw how many people who smoked or drank were really sick from it–advanced cancer, emphysema, advanced liver disease–I was shocked these substances were legal.  Take nicotine–the most addictive substance, harder to quit than heroin or cocaine.  It’s just that tobacco has a historical monopoly on legal inhalation.

“So why is marijuana illegal?” she asked. “Historical accident,” I said. As a senior in college, I took a history class called “Drugs and Alcohol in American Culture.” I wrote my term paper on shifting medical perceptions of marijuana, from the thirties to the seventies. I was intrigued by the association between social perceptions and scientific conclusions.

There was one scientist in particular whose conclusions about the effects of marijuana radically shifted as cultural perceptions shifted from the 1930s to the 1970s.  In the 1930s, he offered scientific evidence to reflect the social understanding of marijuana as a substance that provoked crazed violent reactions, when the drug was associated with Mexican immigrants and crime.  In the 1970s, his research showed marijuana provoked a slackadaisical laziness with loss of motivation when it was used by the nation’s youth.  No crime, no trouble.

“It was almost legalized,” I added, “until Nixon squashed that idea.” “Why are they legalizing it now?” she asked. “They probably need the tax money.  If you turn it into a legitimate business, you get to collect legitimate taxes.”

Newsweek addressed the issue a week later in an interesting sidebar by R. M Schneiderman, entitled “legal weed gets a reality check in California.” Advocates of legalized marijuana say it will increase state tax revenue, and also undercut Mexican drug cartels.   He argues that taxing locally grown marijuana will price it out of the street market, leaving the market wide open for Mexican-grown marijuana, and no real change in the dangerous Mexican criminal activity that marijuana use bolsters.

Suddenly, we’re back in the 1930s again, with marijuana associated with crazed Mexican criminal activity.

I don’t use marijuana.  I don’t prescribe it.  Nor do I smoke tobacco, or advise patients to smoke it.  One is illegal.  One is legal. In suburban Cook County, there are an estimated 391,273 tobacco smokers. In Illinois in 2008, smoking caused an estimated health cost of $4.1 billion. Legal tobacco and illegal marijuana are historical accidents that cost America billions of dollars.

Kohar Jones is a family physician who blogs at Progress Notes.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

email

  • Killroy71

    If you look at doctor’s medical kits from 100 years ago, you’ll see little glass jars labeled with the botanical name, “cannibis sativa.” During the 1930s campaign to outlaw this helpful herb, opponents actually renamed it to sound foreign and dangerous – marijuana – and to distract people from understanding they were banning a substance that had been safely used for generations. Of course, outlawing it has bankrolled criminals on both sides of the border who now have the capital to get into legitimate business. Tax it and stop the killing, a great two-fer. It can be treated like alcohol for other purposes, like not using at work. And while smoke in the lungs is never good, it’s very hard to imagine a pack-a-day reefer habit.

  • http://www.stevebalt.com SteveBMD

    I agree that our society’s responses to alcohol and marijuana are discrepant and illogical, but it’s yet another “historical accident” we have to deal with. (Much like our current health care system, which no sane or thoughtful person would ever create in its present state. But I digress…)

    It is unfortunate, though, that medicine is the avenue by which proponents of legalization have chosen to push their cause. While marijuana can be helpful in certain cases, I’ve found that, unfortunately, it often complicates the care we try to provide. I’ve written about it here: http://bit.ly/eH4QVW

  • ninguem

    In prohibition days, doctors could prescribe “medical” alcohol. Go to ebay and similar sites, looking for medical antiquities. Search “medical alcohol” or similar. See prescriptions for whiskey for “medical” purposes, written in Prohibition days.

    “Medical” marijuana makes about as much sense as “medical” whiskey.

    So treat it the same as whiskey. Legalize it and tax it.

  • Rational Voice

    @ninguem — treating cannabis as we do alcohol doesn’t make any sense. There is no science to justify being so harsh on cannabis; it’s not the same as alcohol.

    Alcohol causes cancer, organ damage, kills brain cells, creates death on the roads and violence in our gathering spots. It’s a toxic poison, and should be treated as such.

    Cannabis on the other hand is 100% natural and non-toxic. It’s more along the lines of aspirin (White willow bark) if even that — unlike aspirin, cannabis won’t ever kill you. It should be an over-the-counter product.

    But we do agree — no matter if you use it, or don’t, it should be legal for all adults to make the safer choice.

    Legalize it. Tax it. Regulate it.

  • Amazing Truths

    Tobacco is the only product available for purchase to anyone of legal age, that is guaranteed to kill you. GUARANTEED TO KILL YOU! Did you get the guaranteed part? Leave the poor pot smoker alone. He probably just buried his lifetime cigarette smoking Mom and lost his Dad when he was young, to a bad liver…

Trending